Comments by "Seven Proxies" (@sevenproxies4255) on "Asian Boss"
channel.
-
Calling it racism is a bit of a stretch. Accents are just funny by nature. And that woman who called it racism should note that western white people also make fun of eachothers english accents. Like americans living in the northern regions making fun of the "southern twang" of americans in the deep south. Or brits making fun of american accent and vice versa.
Even in britain itself, making fun of local accents is fairly common (cockney, scot, irish, scouser, welsh etc.) especially in stand-up comedy and televised sketches. Same goes for americans and british people making fun of Australian english.
Oh, and practically everyone makes fun of how germans and russians speak english as well.
What non-white, non-western people need to understand about white, western culture and humour is that not all instances of impersonation and jokes around accent are hostile or insulting in nature.
Part of "fitting in" in the west means having self-deprecation humor as well as having a witty jest to deliver back when someone is "taking the piss" out of you.
If you run around feeling offended all the time someone makes a joke at your expense, then you'll never fit in or understand western, white people.
And since we have constitutionally protected freedom of speech, it's unlikely that we'll conform to indian or eastern standards of "politeness" and culture in our own homes. But if we visit India, we're likely to "do as the romans do..."
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Heavy Rotation: I agree. South Korea and Japan sadly seems to have been stricken with "the grass is always greener"-complex regarding the west.
Many of them idealize and fetischize the west in a very undeserved way, even to the point where they don't appreciate their own, unique facial features, hair and such.
Personally I blame the long standing culture of conformity in east asia that still has a bit too tight grip on the Japanese and Korean societies.
To a japanese or a korean person, the west must seem very individualistic because western culture celebrates the independent thinker and personality and those who challenges social taboos. I'm convinced that in many korean and japanese citizens there are very individualistic personalities that want to express themselves, but they can't because both societies are traditionally very conformist. So people grow displeased with their own societies and culture, which manifests itself in an obsession and fetishizing of the foreign culture that seems more ideal.
I don't mean to be arrogant when I say it. I don't presume to tell other societies what they should do, because as a nationalist I have respect for national sovreignty. But, I would humbly suggest that maybe Koreans and Japanese people need to take a hard look at their culture of conformity and ask themselves if it actually makes them happy in life and if there is room for any adjustments to it that allows individuals to express themselves more freely in terms of ideas, clothing, hair etc.
I'm not saying it has to be so overdone like it is here in the west (because we have major societal problems in the west that stems from the pursuit of individualism), but a slight adjustment might be worth trying out.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
안나Anna: No, animals most certainly don't.
And if "balance" was the issue, then how come child births and nativity are stagnating in pro-LGBT societies to unsustainiable levels, but the same thing is not happening in anti-LGBT societies?
Suppose that your assumption was correct and that homosexuality was a phenomenon generated by a lack of balance in a population (implied overpopulation), then we wouldn't see the statistical figures of child births dropping below an average of 2 children per couple.
But in practically every country that has embraced the pride-idiocy we're seeing the average drop below 2. And that is a clear sign of a dangerous population decline and a society growing old in terms of average age.
This will have disastrous humanitarian effects on the countries afflicted, because the older an average population in a society gets, the more the few young people will have to work in order to finance the pensions and welfare of old people who are too old, frail and diseased to work.
Or, failing that, society will simply be forced to leave it's older generation out to dry (no geriatric care to the elderly, no supvervised retiremenrt homes to help them get through their daily lives with dignity etc.)
Either way, this development will have massive humanitarian reprecussions.
And as we've already seen abundant proof of in both Europe and the U.S, importing uneducated migrants from the third world does not create any solution to the low fertility. It only generates more costs since the majority of migrants remain unemployed for years and even decades putting extra strain on the welfare budget, and many of them even resort to criminal behaviour, creating a further financial burden for the societies that takes them in.
Given the choice of having the economy completely collapse in western countries, forcing young western citizens to work even more than they already do or leaving the elderly simply to die in pain amd anguish.
OR
Discouraging homosexuality because homosexuals do not lead lifestyles conducive to procreation.
Then i'm sorry, i'm going to go with the latter.
Homosexuals "right" to live as sexual deviants is not more important than the sustainiability and survival of our economies and societies.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2