Comments by "Seven Proxies" (@sevenproxies4255) on "The Critical Drinker"
channel.
-
1500
-
316
-
271
-
264
-
260
-
224
-
218
-
214
-
196
-
142
-
128
-
127
-
126
-
108
-
74
-
66
-
61
-
49
-
46
-
43
-
40
-
35
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
24
-
23
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
In all fairness, the Soviet Union wasn't as repressive towards culture as reputation have it cracked up to be.
If you ask people who lived in it, they'll tell you that they were very familiar with culture and fiction from the "capitalist west".
Moby Dick, Sherlock Holmes, Treasure Island, Spaghetti Westerns. All of them were read and viewed by a Soviet audience, with the blessings of the state.
The reason for this is that despite the state socialism, the soviets mostly respected culture and saw exposure to it as an integral part to education, and they did implement statewide education quite successfully, turning a country of mostly illiterate farmers into a country where almost everyone was literate, and higher education produced engineers and scientists that made them win the space race.
Their censors looked more to repressing works that directly and overtly contradicted the state or tried to spread dissent. So outright political texts would end up being censored, while storytelling and fiction were mostly left alone.
There are more prominent examples of cultural censorship in other socialist states though, like China, Cambodia and North Korea. Their officials were among the first to think that stories from the capitalist west might inspire sedition among the population, which is why they censored more harshly.
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8