Comments by "The Phoenix Saga" (@The_Phoenix_Saga) on "Asmongold TV " channel.

  1.  @MikMoen  Divisive vitriol - because the opposite side doesn't resort to the words "Bigot" and "Ignorant" and any "ism" or "phobe" they can conjure up. 🙄 But sure HE'S the one being divisive...
    90
  2. "Why treat adults like children and control what content is available" to paraphrase your question about 29 mins in. And i answer - its all control. They dont want people's opinions they want obediant compulsion. They want you eager to snap up what they make and agree to their message and not be inclined to ask questions or challenge the agenda. Theres much more sinister implications in all this... hence they look to cancel and shut down any form of commentary that controverts their agenda.
    56
  3.  @sondergaard913  And just who would YOU say was the "Right one" then. 😒 Well come on, out with it.
    48
  4.  @ModernPatriarchy  Remove one set of sins to replace them with another. I'll pass on both.
    26
  5.  @mattcoccopuffs  There's no law that states what someone says to get in power must be honoured. They could tell you they can turn lead to gold if it gets you to tick for them - doesn't mean they have to do it, you're just the fool deciding to tick. Face it - all of you who have taken part have done so simply out of a habit of obedience - you get told to vote and so you obey.
    22
  6. You mean that WASNT a legitmate email?! Damnit... i just lost all my savings, didnt i... 🙃
    16
  7.  @youtubeenjoyer1743  There is no right candidate though. Establishment will never allow it. What I don't get is that no law exists demanding that whoever gets in power, must do what they said they'll do in order to get folk to choose them. Countless have said they'll resolve the issue and yet each one never materialises: what does that tell you. Cause it tells me that only the fool depends on the opportunist
    15
  8.  @stronensycharte64  But it's good enough to keep supporting the fascists in Ukraine.
    8
  9. Without even understanding what it actually means... or how they got to exist in the first place.
    8
  10.  @knighter1209  And here you are referring to anything you disagree with as "Faaaaaaar right" - why thank you once again for proving my point.
    8
  11. The only way they could save it, is by scraping the lot and starting again - with NONE of the DEI bull.
    7
  12.  @knighter1209  "The most right wing" are your words and what could be more right wing than far right? Sit down before you hurt yourself, kid.
    7
  13. Sorry for being that cynical sod - but prepare to be disappointed.
    6
  14.  @puma21puma21  But they did choose to vote and by doing so, they by default accepted the actions in advance of those who entered power.
    6
  15. Not just can, but will.
    6
  16.  @adrenjones9301  Exactly. A free man who must ask permission to be free, is truly not a free man at all.
    6
  17.  @LawfulBased  it's cultural - race just happens to be a matter involved in it. Your argument has merit but it's emphasising the wrong matter - not all Muslims are middle eastern for instance. The matter is the equivalent of having the vegans imposing their dietary choice on a nation who thrive on meat: inevitably they're going to clash.
    5
  18.  @araamahasla555  As a notoriously infamous man once said "The first war is to rewrite history, take away a people's lineage and they're easily persuaded." Another also said "A lie repeated enough becomes accepted as truth."
    5
  19. Seriously who gets involved in such a process - there isn't a law that states whoever gets in power must do exactly what they state they'll do. So why is anyone surprised that no party has ever resolved the issue? And it's something none of them ever will - because establishment doesn't want to; all they want is the voter to tick and thus obey.
    4
  20.  @theunknown7441  If a man makes it, another can change or break it.
    4
  21. Cant dictate what people can and cant do with what they own.
    4
  22. They've been calling against it and yet they still vote thus submitting to the choices made by whoever gets in. There's no law that states who gets in must follow word for word what they said they would do. So who in their right mind would continue being involved in such a process. It's why i never have.
    3
  23.  @semkjaer3581  Believe? It was blatantly stated and supported by the very media that demonises anyone who challenges the narrative!
    2
  24.  @dakkenly  Exactly.
    2
  25. So long as things are limited and given a value - people will jump at this. Banning won't do anything except make everyone else even more miserable.
    2
  26. Two things make this sad - 1, we worry more about what's going on in another part of the world better left alone, then we do in our own. And 2, we keep being spoonfed this ridiculous notion that we need what they're condemning over there, over here for the sake of "inclusion and enrichment"
    2
  27.  @Zionswasd  Or the Philistines thousands of years before that.
    2
  28. And so my misanthropy gets worse.
    2
  29.  @emilioparrilla465  The people doing it with their own hands is the only way to go. You're absolutely right about their "representative" potentially lying to them just to get in - fact is each one vying for power does just that. What annoys me most is that this isn't anything new - it's happened from time beyond time, but people still keep falling for the same ploy and then complain when the same thing happens. I swear I've seen abusive relationships last far less.
    1
  30. Thats very true.
    1
  31. Where did they come from and why have we let them take over? Well to answer both: they're a result of a successive line of generations; each more subverted than the last in a subtle cascade. And as for how they been able to take over - they've been permitted by wilful ignorance and disregard.
    1
  32.  @MagcargoMan  Oh there is ALWAYS one... last I checked - none of here are a hundred years old, so none of us "Colonised" anything. Drop that one already, it's as overplayed as it is misapplied.
    1
  33. Ahahaha hahaha haha no.
    1
  34. I'll be buying it, for my entertainment and to spite them; the ones who use typical deflection towards a fictional character whilst probably calling that sickening "Cuties" a 'misunderstood masterpiece' when anyone with any sense knows what it really is.
    1
  35. We're in the sharp decline of society. We've gotten past its founding and reached its pinnacle of bounty and once you reach the peak, its all down hill from there. And its nothing new - history repeats repeats it's course, only the details change.
    1
  36. And its not what you think.
    1
  37. Next is by fire. He swore never to flood the world again and unlike man - He can be trusted to keep His word.
    1
  38.  @murphychurch8251  And that my friend is a testament to how Democracy ends in Authoritatianism. Always. I can blame the voter and I do - because it's through their consenting and submission to the process that those in charge are able to do what they do.
    1
  39.  @JMPERager  Oh I love hearing this argument - I destroy it each time. On the contrary my friend, I hold NO responsibility for the actions of the lot in power, because I didn't consent to them not, nor join in the process of surrendering my personal rights in exchange for some petty privileges that are taken away as easy as they are given. By ticking a box next to a name you're not only submitting to the winners whims, you are responsible for everything they do: in a society of wilful ignorant, self-centered people, what sort can be expected to rise in its leaders? I tell you - I have MORE valid reason to complain because those who are in are in because voters empowered them: how else do you think they got to power in the first place?! In short It's not me with no right to complain - it's those gullible enough to fall for the snake oil salesmen.
    1
  40.  @PaulusAlone  Start with everyone taking responsibility for themselves, stop enabling the system and for goodness sake, reject voting.
    1
  41.  @Poc3d  You wouldn't walk in the middle of a busy crowd with your cash and bank details in hand would you? If you did, you would need to know you're taking a grave risk of being mugged or you're just a blind and naive fool. The same with the vote: you're choosing someone who you know only through what they've told you, you know nothing else - then they just tell you out of thin air that they will do this and that so long as you choose them.... and you believe them? How are you then either no more responsible for their actions or any less foolish to have to behold how they completely hoodwinked you.
    1
  42.  @DuoMaxwellDS  What I'm saying is that there is no law that says a politician has to honour their word that got them elected. Basically people are believing a complete stranger to have power over them regardless of whether they deliver or not. But by choosing and ticking the box, they have legally accepted that authority over them, so they have no grounds of complaint. Starmer is in, because those who chose him, LET him and even those who didn't but chose others, still signed their submission due to the process. Only those who did not take part in the farce have any right to complain. What I'm telling you is to start realising the truth - every four years or so you're sold a lie, you're all being tricked.
    1
  43.  @Drunkledore  Well done, that's step one.
    1
  44.  @supertrexandroidx  You see it; it's a vague promise to which the gullible fall for and then they whine when the truth comes to light. But what do they do? They fall for it again with the next lot!
    1
  45.  @hermityt1  As if the other parties are any different...
    1
  46.  @supertrexandroidx  And there you go again - blinded by the process...
    1
  47.  @supertrexandroidx  Elections can't occur without votes and without those a power can not be given in a system that requires them. That's how you undo it all and when someone tries to throw their weight then everyone just tells them to sod off. I never said that nothing I do matters, what I said was that taking part in the same system results in more of the same. Honestly, pay attention. But you go along now, wait for the next vote and just go tick your little box like a good little boy or girl. Just keep doing more of what they tell you to do - then don't blame me when they use it against you.
    1
  48.  @theFORZA66  As someone who knows that every politician regardless of party, are all on the same payroll - I say that about every fool who goes to vote.
    1
  49.  @JMPERager  You still refuse to see the reality. You still think that there's a party that's going to MAGICALLY change things. Face fact: it isn't going to happen. All you're doing by taking part is surrendering consent to the process and relinquish every right to complain when things don't go the way you guilibly believed they would to a roster of complete strangers you've essentially given a blank cheque to do as they want when they want in your name. I've seen that exact same argument you've made a thousand times and I've destroyed it each time: by not participating i haven't surrendered to the process and so I have no responsibility to those who get in and do what they do. And the harsh reality which you continue to deny is that no matter what "roster" gets in, they're all on the same payroll and they do as they're told lest they be replaced. They're not there for you: take the hint.
    1
  50.  @Axern89  Trump didnt tell Deere he couldnt do it, only he would be made to pay more. Poor comparison dude.
    1