Comments by "The Phoenix Saga" (@The_Phoenix_Saga) on "Tousi TV" channel.

  1.  @resiplayerz  and there's just one, minor detail you're overlooking: there's still thousands of EU laws in the UK'S... and no push from the mob to remove them. The majority of people are too focused on not losing their benefits and the likes of Labour are capitalising on it. They're too disillusioned by strikes, which are what the Tories are counting on. As long as those laws remain and the amount of backhanders remain in the echelons, Brexit is only in name when it should be absolute and final.
    1
  2.  @juj298  I don't, which is why I say this with much confidence and equally as much frustration. Reform will either get in line with the status quo or never even get a sniff of power and that's not conjecture; that's just a fact. Made up of defectors of both cheeks of the same arse, the party is inevitably going to do what it takes if theyre serious and that means playing the the game; the game in which the voter ALWAYS loses. Their vote isn't a reflection of choice - it's the illusion of it. People are doing squat, easily manipulated and deluded - don't think so? Wasn't that long ago they were all rolling up their sleeves while crying if they forgot their mask, before that they were dancing to Gangnam Style and before that the Macarena. If you can't see this then you're an obstinate fool; even if you vote for Reform, you're doing what the establishment wants as all you're doing is splitting the vote and giving either Labour or Tory an easier time of winning by technicality and by some sheer fluke if Reform wins, nothing is going to change: you'll be complaining and I'll be there to say I told you so.
    1
  3.  @juj298  then you are a complete fool. You just don't get the fact you're helping one side or the other - no matter how you try and cut it. Even in defiance, you're doing what you claim to refuse doing. Carry on puppet, carry on.
    1
  4.  @juj298  and by doing so you contribute in the guarantee that either Sunak or Starmer walk right into number ten at the next election... you not understand that yet? You contribute to splitting the vote and either party have a numbers game advantage of the seat over the other. You can not win in this rigged system and you're either too bullheaded or disillusioned to not see it how it is - Reform will either act in the same manner as either Labour and Tory in which what was the point or much like the Brexit and UKIP parties; will NEVER set foot near that door. Remember the last time UKIP won power? Spoiler alert - they had a grand total of one seat and lost that within a few short months. You want to know what I stand for? To have people do things by their own power instead of lazily going by the same argument "Oh X party will see it right..." THEY NEVER DO! A career politician is only in it for one thing and that's their career. Period.
    1
  5.  @juj298  tell us without telling us you're a hopeless wonderer for a lost cause in an exercise in futility - continously trying to douse a fire with diesel. Do not think for a moment you're the only one who wants the Tories and Labour out for good.
    1
  6.  @ninaaniston1717  that window has gone down to about 8 months nowadays
    1
  7.  @hordegaming4771  or the wishful thinking of the bumbling opposition for that matter.
    1
  8.  @polaris7122  given how desperate they were coming to England for a bailout, they may as well have been. Why else would they have done so in the first place, or megerly accepted Anne to declare the union?
    1
  9. Two things - she's not entirely wrong, but 1, the left has always aspired to this - so trying to put any blame on the "Far right" is a fallacy. Both as she claims are indeed opposites, but they're opposites of the offshoots of the left. And this has been going on for decades with recently the movement moving so quick it's become apparent. I also suspect this to be too convenient - the fanatics have always been known to boast their intentions through means like this. I suspect she's been encouraged to tell everyone about the facts - they're proud of it.
    1
  10. And we gave that money...why?! I opposed it before and I'm facepalming now; especially with the audacity of this ungrateful bitch. The money came out of OUR pocket which could've been used for far more vital things.
    1
  11. Question is; who do you vote for? The Tories are corrupt, Labour want to sell us out, the Lib Dems are inept, the Greens are lunatics and the rest are simply too small. A government is a reflection of it's people and the fact we keep getting idiots across the aisle into power tells not just about them, but about us too. If this country wants good leaders then we need to as individuals, get good.
    1
  12.  @douglasrutter6809  call me ignorant but I have no clue who they are.
    1
  13. No, we have TWO genders and they're not interchangeable. You're either born a boy or born a girl - hermephrodites are NOT an exception, the internal organs are either one or the other so that rules that argument out. End of. Hearing their bs is reinforcing my identity as a Misanthrope.
    1
  14. Of course he wants unrest - the establishment is counting on it. The 40 percent of people who are aware of what's going on - only about 5 percent of that will know not to fall for the bait. The remaining will go up in arms and bring about unrest... and the other sixty percent of the country - blind and oblivious will panic at the sight, looking to beg for a quick fix because they want "normality" back. And that's when the bar snaps down, the trap triggered. The government will happily indulge them... at the price of their liberties and "rights" which are in truth mere privileges - portrayed as "Just a temporary measure, until it's all over." Dictatorship is seldom appointed by force, but almost always welcomed through democratic process: Rome did the same when Casear was appointed protector - they suspended democracy and gave him absolute power to deal with their plight. And he never gave that power back. Same with Cromwell, same with France, same with Stalin, Adolf, Mao, Kim and Poi. It's the same story and people fall for it every time.
    1
  15.  @robroots2492  by not playing the game at all. There's only one way to end this madness once and for all and unfortunately the masses are too inert and dependant on the system we yearn to undo.
    1
  16.  @whatayear  and when social media kicks in like it always does?
    1
  17.  @davidbanner9001  that's typical of any party, yes.
    1
  18. "Working Royals" Hah! About as comical as the idea that democracy is "for the sake of people having their voice heard" or that "Government have our best interest at heart" what a joke.
    1
  19.  @nretik  Your point about government is correct - though they're merely puppets to those who really run things. However I have studied into the "Royal" family and all their 'wealth' is undeserved and unjustified. What, because a thousand years ago a pretentious egotistical prat from Normandy was able to convince a few thousand drunken suspecious halfwits that they ought to make him king and take ownership of land? Well if I declare myself Emperor, through convincing a million or so to follow me - does that make me so? No, it doesn't. And as for the "work" aspect - stuffing their face and being so pretentious so as to travel luxuriously around the world to lecture people on how they're living their lives wrong - when none of them have ever earned their own keep their entire lives or had to live without: ALL at the expense of the taxpayer, does not constitute as "working hard" were they not being recognised as "royals" by ridiculous halfwits, they'd be seen for what they are: a bunch of brattish, deluded benefit claimants who wouldn't know work if it smacked them in the face. And Charlie like mommy before him and every last monarch since the restoration has done NOTHING. The last one who did anything, did so by receiving an axe to the neck... ironically also called Charlie. And the "wind farming" I'm actually laughing at that - those things are counter productive, cost more to build then they ever will make in profit and when they need decommissioning, will cause more "environmental damage" then the source that anyone with any sense would just use, ever could... and guess what; those wind farms need oil just to run - so 'noble' a waste of money on land that Charlie has 'inherited' but hasn't ever earned. And money? That's even richer - he's a "King" of a nation like every other that has a currency backed on how much debt it owes as the pound is; like the Euro and Dollar etc...WORTHLESS! So much for "handling money" properly - can't even get any that has any actual worth since the last pound worth anything on its own was concluded in the 30s with the dropping of the gold standard.
    1
  20.  @jogger949  that's because most people are mindless, easily distracted, idiotic puppets.
    1
  21.  @awakeandwatching953  seems like you hit a little too close to home.
    1
  22.  @mijicmugendo  that's irrelevant; FOM is for the EU countries and we're not in the EU. The fact of the matter is that we're being expected again to take up the shit because Macron won't do his job deliberately as an "Up yours" to the English, this time for not cowtowing to the ramblings of that failed reich.
    1
  23.  @johnmcmahon5145  due to a corrupt and incompetent parliament - both government and opposition. There's so much we could be doing, but we have too many career politicians and opportunist backhanders looking to make a quick profit at the hindering of our means.
    1
  24. @Unbroken Always To The Tyrants.
    1
  25.  @steveedwards5698  You clearly don't know how the game is played. He's doing all he is because he's either consented to or instructed: were he not standing in line, he'd already be removed and replaced. Remember Truss was outed for far less.
    1
  26. Good. Back to the pit where she belongs: and as for Starmer, he needs chucking there too.
    1
  27. One would hope so, but now the EU will send their dogs in to quell it.
    1
  28. I wonder if they'd have all had the same tune if he'd have been against the illegals in the same manner...😒
    1
  29.  @richardhussey7641  but he did a "great job" at opening the floodgates and pander to the EU...
    1
  30. Problem is this is the typical turning point of yet another revolution - and whenever revolution comes in terms of way of life - it's never for the better.
    1
  31. Yet another traitor who's neck needs to meet the block.
    1
  32.  @noelward8047  I'm quite familiar with them, however that kind of argument of yours is why nothing ever changes. "The lesser of two evils" argument in this instance, well when you're knee deep in shit, be glad it's not up to your neck; but you're still knee deep in shit.
    1
  33.  @michaelfoley9904  utilised when convenient you mean. Oh had they voted Yes to independence would they allow for a second vote? I don't think so, because the likes of Sturgeon will have gotten what she wants and she'd drop the Scots the moment it became convenient to do so.
    1
  34. And so the theatre plays on its act. She acts like the altruistic hero, knowing full well any move she makes will be blocked and thus guaranteeing her support so she can continue things going the way the establishment wants. I couldn't think as slow as the dullards believing their vote makes a difference if I tried.
    1
  35. It's an exercise in futility - it's either the Tories or Labour; the system of voting we're under assures it. Reform is essentially throwing your vote away. No, if we want away with these clowns we need rid of the system.
    1
  36. Oh how I'd love to hear him rant about Brexit and shout louder to "SHUT THE FUCK UP!"
    1
  37. Get it through your skulls - you try winning through the rigged system; you merely grant consent and legality to their justification of irreprehensible acts. You're wasting your efforts this way!
    1
  38.  @WilliamHBonnie1978  how doesn't it make sense? Labour inflated the service to an unsustainable manner and the Tories came in with big words and little action.
    1
  39.  @Lucky13Ravens  well what do you expect? Would you like to explain to everyone why their tax rate has accelerated - including the very people within the civil service and on top of that - the price hike to all goods and services to match? And in the process make the issue with the national debt - impossible to pay as it already is, even worse?
    1
  40.  @WilliamHBonnie1978  they say the same thing. So do you have anything to add to the conversation or do you plan on being pedantic without a justifiable purpose? If the latter - good day.
    1
  41.  @HonestlyHonest-o3x  So you're equally responsible for what this administration and government are doing on behalf of their masters.
    1
  42.  @robinnigel5439  He's just a puppet like the rest of them in power, I assure you he can and he will. Establishment will demand it.
    1
  43.  @HonestlyHonest-o3x  you may not have voted for them, but if you voted at all, you consented to the process - therefore you are responsible for what they do.
    1
  44.  @HåkonOdinsson  So you still put your mark on a ballet paper. Right. So again you've simply signed to consent to the process because you'd be hoping a majority would do the same, yes? Since you did that and your side lost - the winner still have your consent to the process: ergo, you have permitted this.
    1
  45.  @HåkonOdinsson  For one thing I don't consent to anyone to 'represent' me other than myself. I take no part in the system that's built to control under the illusion of choice when it's nothing but a rat's maze - for another. I stand my ground on my rights, not their decided privileges. I answer to none of their imposed authority. Questions?
    1
  46. Well as much as I have no desire to go along with anything the likes of government have to say these days - it's about time the spoilt brat Charlie does a little bit of work for once in his life.
    1
  47. Blind leading the blind... how foolish.
    1
  48. @Argent Wolf you're familiar with Ideological Subversion.
    1
  49.  @KyleTheDalek  at this point it would be very difficult; not impossible but difficult. We would have to start Ideological Subversion in direction of traditional value with the next generation. The ones at present are too far gone. The first stage is Demoralisation and that's been repeated over and over for the last century almost with each generation after the last becoming more and more engrossed with this ideology we're seeing. It takes approximately 20 years to demoralise a nation with one generation and once they're adults the process is complete and irreversible. So even if we started RIGHT now it would still take another 20 years max to start undoing the damage and of course those who are indoctrinated already will not go down easy - look how quick they are to cancel. Another thing we would need to do is FORCE our establishment to stop abetting this philosophy and to not invest in nations that propogate it. And seeing as we're nearing the end of stage two we don't have long left. Once the nation hits crisis it's all but over as the truth - even if accepted won't matter to people desperate for the bare necessities. Chairman Mao in China can be attributed with that with his "Great Leap Forward" in which he starved his nation to such desperation that families were exchanging their own children with their neighbours so they wouldn't feel as guilty of committing the ultimate atrocity with their own. You'll find the true depth of the matter in older books as the new ones "conveniently" omit it - "History is written by the winners" after all "A great lie agreed upon. They were starving and desperate - then Mao came and offered a way out at the cost of their liberties "for just a short while" and we know in politics, a short while is never quite short, but desperate the people fell for it and so look at China now - even Stalin would never have dreamed of such "success" at subjugation and obedience - with the people for the most part WANTING to be for they deem it better then starving to the point of resorting to those measures, in spite of their leaders being the ones who caused it.
    1
  50. @Argent Wolf those weren't attempts, they were deliberate injection of idealism; an idea to be touched into the education system, then they backed off as too much would immediately attract the attention of too many people. Just enough to have the young succeptible and too little for the older to be distracted from their work to argue against it. How China went in terms of starvation, it won't happen this time. It doesn't have to - look at how desperate Canada was last week with a 24 hour Internet blackout. Of course there are those who tell of the loss of their wars, but sadly aside from the likes of you and I who would heed their side of the story; who pays them heed? Nobody. To the mainstream they're just "conspiracy theorists" as if THAT was a bad thing. As for you being on the left as a teen; I don't say this to mock or call you for it, having had many views like that during my youth. However there is an expression that goes that as a child, you're more aligned to the left but as you get older - so long as you don't get contaminated by such brainwash, you find yourself leaning further to the right as the world at 25 is not the same in the mind of a 10 year old.
    1