Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "TLDR News EU" channel.

  1. Nothing to do with Fascism of any kind.
    3
  2. EU has always been full of these Far-Left parties.
    2
  3. Liberalism ain't Left wing though.
    2
  4. wealth inequality is only a problem for decadent jealous people.
    2
  5.  @dererik9070  : There is no connection between money and democracy. Being wealthy doesn't magically take people's ability to vote away.
    2
  6.  @jasminv8653  : It's called being a realist.
    2
  7. There is no Far-Right in European mainstream politics though.
    2
  8.  @abricots5588  " and hold ext reme rig ht ideologies," They don't.
    2
  9.  @abricots5588  "I think they should still be labeled as f ar-right." They are not. Again, They are cen ter-right at best.
    2
  10. You have no clue what Far-right means then.
    2
  11. They have nothing to do with National Socialism, which was a socialist Far-Left ideology anyways.
    2
  12. These aren't even Far-Right parties.
    2
  13. @Teemustaja : They are neither Far-Right nor Fascist (Far-Left).
    2
  14. People just have no clue what Fascism means nor what it represented.
    2
  15. You do realize that it is the "private interest" that keeps the country going by bringing in the tax money, right?
    2
  16. There is no "far-ri ght" in Finland, unless we count the small "Liberal Party" which advocates for smaller government and Classical Liberalism / Libertarianism in general.
    2
  17.  @lupus3824  "The NSDAP was also democratically elected." They weren't. They didn't get enough votes so they had to establish a Coalition government.
    2
  18. Except there barely are billionaires in Europe. If you go and look the top 10 countries regarding billionaires, there are only 2 EU countries listed (Germany, Italy) and UK. If you look at top 20, we can add 2 more (France, Sweden). Both USA and China have more billionaires than all the EU countries combined.
    2
  19. I wouldn't say socialism per se as European countries do not have it. Instead they have a Mixed economy system known as Social-Democracy. However the answer to the question is, the socialistic "welfare-state", which is a money sink and unsustainable concept.
    2
  20. Nothing to do with Fascism.
    2
  21. "THe current nazi party controlling our right wing goverment " Such a sentence is an oxymoron. the NSDAP was Far-Left.
    2
  22. Nothing to do with Far-Right.
    2
  23.  @ExarchGaming  "and the actual far right in the US are literal neo nazis, neo-confederates, or other fascist analogs. " Except Neo-Nazis and Fascists are on the Far-Left, hun ... just like the rest of the collectivist and socialist ideologues.
    2
  24. The Nazis were from the Far-Left though.
    2
  25.  @Laezar1  "The national rally is a far right party founded by neo nazis, " So Far-Left then... nothing to do with Right wing of any kind.
    2
  26.  @Laezar1  : They were Far-Left because their economy was based on socialism. Not much to do with their name, but it certainly signified what they were advocating for; socialism on a national level.
    2
  27.  @toyotaprius79  " and their union busting." Independent union busting happened under every socialist regime. NSDAP just nationalized and merged them into one single super union known as the DAF.
    2
  28. Only a very small group on the far left would want to elect such revolutionary social ists.
    2
  29. There is no Far-Right in Finland, and "Perusuomalaiset" are barely on the Right in the first place. "Kristillisdemokraatit" are not Right wing either. Regardless, I wonder if people would have known that Li Andersson is openly a Marxist... would people still vote for her.
    2
  30.  @otherhouse  "but to their social values and parties they form governments with." Social values have nothing to do with the left/right spectrum, which is about political policies and economics.
    2
  31.  @RedXlV  : Depends on the country in question and what is considered traditional there.
    2
  32.  @minestar2247  : That was an example of Far-Left socialism. Nothing to do with Right wing of any kind.
    2
  33.  @minestar2247  "there is nothing socialist about that government," There certainly was. You cannot be an advocate for centralized planning and strong government controls without being a socialist. That's what made Hitler a socialist. He may have been to the right from the Bolsheviks, but he was still a socialist leftist as he believed in strong central government control. Hitler outright declared himself a socialist in Mein Kampf, just not the Marxist international or full Soviet type. He struggled with HOW to distinguish his socialism from the rest of the Marxist crowd.
    2
  34.  @minestar2247  "socialism isnt having a strong central government ... socialism is basically trying making the economy less hierarchical and more democratic, the left also has the idea of progress and such, " Socialism is not an ideology. Socialism is an economic system where the collective (such as workers, guilds, the government etc.) either directly own or control the buildings and tools that make goods and services like farms and factories. This can be achieved through decentralized and direct worker-ownership, or through centralized state-ownership or control of the means of production. National Socialists had the latter.
    2
  35.  @minestar2247  "no, the national socialists didn't have the collective own the means of production," Wrong. They did and that collective entity was the State apparatus.
    2
  36.  @bjoardar  " is something you really should ask yourself." Nope. Try again.
    2
  37.  @Drkon6  " Argentina sure is looking great right now." It is actually, compared to the decades of inflation and socialism under Peronism. Try again.
    2
  38. Germany never had Far-Right.
    2
  39.  @johnhobbes2268  "Even other European far right " What other Far-Right? There aren't any in European mainstream politics in the first place.
    2
  40.  @jeyna8243  : "she wants it to be fascist." Wait, she is a socialist?
    2
  41. There is no Far-Right in France though.
    2
  42. Why? That's easy, because of the socialistic "walfare state" concept and Keynesian economics. These do not work, will never work, and will collapse a country eventually.
    2
  43. "Fasci sm left unscrutinised again" Fas cism is not a thing and hasn't been a thing since the WW2 era, hun.
    2
  44. The Finns Party ain't Far-Right. They are barely Right wing.
    2
  45.  @kataroquasinzki7383  "Anything with far-right policies is accurately called far-right. That's it" You have never seen far-right policies. They simply do not exist in Europe. Meanwhile in Argentina though.
    2
  46.  @tobib6885  "I find it funny that you imply that all of the parties mentioned in this video, except the far right ones, are somehow left" All of them are left leaning, more or less. There are no mainstream Far-Right parties in whole Europe. It's not exactly popular to advocate free market Capitalism, limiting the size and scope of the Government and shutting down the socialistic "welfare state" concept. Europe needs to hit rock bottom with their debts and inflation, like Argentina, before (Classical) Liberalism becomes popular.
    2
  47.  @tobib6885  : Political and economical policies are the very things that make the political spectrum.
    2
  48. There is no Fascism anywhere tho.
    2
  49.  @Krack2805  "U blind to how fascism works or how it comes about? " No. There are plenty of books to know how Fascism worked and how it came about. Currently there are nobody advocating for such revolutionary and statist socialism based on National Syndicalism. Also the only notable and still active Neo-Fascist movement can be found from Argentina, known as Peronism.
    2
  50.  @Krack2805  "U wanna just wait and let it happen before doing anything?" The only thing people can do to prevent Fascism, is to be against socialism, statism, nationalism and collectivism in general.
    2