Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "TLDR News EU" channel.

  1. There is no Far-Right anywhere in Europe.
    1
  2. There is no Far-Right in France.
    1
  3. There is no Far-Right in France in the first place.
    1
  4. There hasn't been Fascists in France since the WW2 era.
    1
  5. I highly doubt that Le Pen is a socialist, and therefore not a Fascist.
    1
  6.  @QabilAGhor  : Nope, and there is no Far-Right in France to begin with.
    1
  7. What Far-Right? Doesn't exist.
    1
  8. There is no Far-Right in France though.
    1
  9. There is no Far-Right in France.
    1
  10. Fascists were Far-Leftists tho.
    1
  11. There is no Far-Right in France.
    1
  12. There is no Far-Right in France though.
    1
  13. There is no Far-Right in France.
    1
  14.  @JCree-si2th  "If right-wing parties govern countries, their global coalition would be mean global nazi government." Except Nazis were Far-Left socialists. They had nothing to do with Right wing of any kind.
    1
  15.  @cub35guy  : Fascists most certainly were Far-Left socialists. How about you go read some history, starting from who Georges Sorel was and how his Sorelianism and National Syndicalism in general, influenced Mussolini and was the basis for Fascism.
    1
  16.  @cub35guy  "You don’t need the word FASCIST in your party to be one." True. However you need to be a Far-Left socialist and advocate for National Syndicalism to be one.
    1
  17.  @cub35guy  "le pen is far right" Wrong. He is a centrist.
    1
  18. There is no Fascism.
    1
  19. However, there is no Far-Right in France.
    1
  20.  @ittestnow  : Hitler never abolished unions. He merged and nationalized them into one single super union known as the Deutsche Arbeitsfront (DAF, or German Labor Front). Still the biggest union ever created in Europe at least. The DAF created one single overarching labor union. Essentially all German workers and employees in every economic sector belonged to the DAF. For example, farmers were coordinated into the Reich Food Estate. While traditional unions prioritized workers’ rights, the DAF emphasized national economic goals above personal well-being. Now if you want to talk about unions, well Hitler was merely imitating Lenin, who had earlier closed down all independent labor associations, factory committees and worker cooperatives, banned strikes, walkouts, and lockouts. Lenin even forced workers to work a slavish 80-hour week. After the Bolsheviks banned all labor unions, one unionist “described the unions as ‘living corpses.’” Any Russian worker who participated in general strikes was arrested, imprisoned or shot. Under Lenin’s regime, workers had no real representation or bargaining rights and were treated like industrial serfs who were chained to their factories. Although Hitler followed Lenin’s nationalizing craze, his treatment of workers did not mimic their Russian counterparts.
    1
  21.  @ittestnow  "so you think the NAZI’s were a far left government?" It's not a matter of thinking. It's a historical fact that they were, almost identical to Stalin's USSR actually.
    1
  22.  @ittestnow  "You do know there are things called books and there are even history books." Yes, and I have plenty of them. I highly suggest you start from 'Mein Kamp' , the second part, if you want to know the basics of their ideology. Then "Hitler's National Socialism" by Rainer Zitelmann. Then "the Vampire Economy" by Günter Reimann.
    1
  23.  @ittestnow  "are you insane yeah the far left NAZI’s wanted to exterminate the far left Russians. " Yes, because according to the National Socialists, they were practicing socialism wrong. National Socialism came from the belief that the "Stateless and Classless society" Communism calls for after its dictatorship cannot achieve Socialism, and that only the State can properly organize a Socialist Society. “I have learned a great deal from Marxism as I do not hesitate to admit… The difference between them and myself is that I have really put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun. The whole of National Socialism is based on it… National Socialism is what Marxism might have been if it could have broken its absurd and artificial ties with a democratic order.” — Hitler Speaks (1940)
    1
  24. "from the NAZI right." Doesn't exist. National Socialism was a Far-Left, socialist 3rd position ideology, buddy.
    1
  25. There is no Fascism in France to begin with.
    1
  26. There is no Far-Right in France.
    1
  27. There is no Far-Right.
    1
  28.  @Josh-99  : There is no Fascism in France, nor anywhere in Europe.
    1
  29. Far-right has never been a thing in either country.
    1
  30.  @adammarx123  "how fasc ists are far-left out of the sudden?" They always were far-left, since fascis m was a socia list ideology based on national syndicalism adapted from Georges Sorel. The idea was that society would be consolidated (i.e., incorporated) into syndicates (in the Italian context, fascio/fasci) which would be regulated by and serve as organs for the state, or "embody" the state (corpus = body). The purpose was the centralization and synchronization of society under the state, as an end unto itself. To quote Mussolini's infamous aphorism: "All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state."
    1
  31.  @adammarx123  : You just have no clue what you are talking about.
    1
  32.  @user-df1ns1ob8y  "Fascism is (unfortunately) far from dead, hun." Fascism is dead, but few countries still have Neo-Fascism.
    1
  33.  mr-andrew  : Fas cism has not been a thing since the W W2 era, hun.
    1
  34. @@James__Smith The have nothing in common. It is the extreme right and extreme left that has one thing in common, that being Anarchy.
    1
  35. @@James__Smith : No. Nothing to do with right wing of any kind whatsoever.
    1
  36. "(neoza nists and neofas cists)." They are far-left, hun.
    1
  37.  @user-rh3pe7um8d : "What do Hi tler and Muss olini have to do with this debate?" I guess some low IQ sm ooth bra ins think that those two 3rd position socia lists were somehow "right wingers" just because they opposed marx ism.
    1
  38. Far-right hasn't been a thing in either Germany nor Italy.
    1
  39. It's not rocket science people. Read some books for crying out loud. If you want it simple: Far-right ideologies advocate for Classical Liberalism. Far-left ideologies advocate for collectivism and socialism. Going to the right from Center, you can see ideologies such as Republicanism. Going to the left from Center, you can see ideologies such as Social-Democracy. Extreme right would be Anarcho-Capitalism. Extreme left would be Communism.
    1
  40.  @cdcdrr  "It's rac ist natio nalism that's the extr eme right, not AnCaps. " Wrong. Racism and nationa lism have no political alignment. For example modern day Chi na is rather xen opho bic and very nationa listic, yet they have nothing to do with right wing of any kind.
    1
  41. @@abitmorerational "left wing politics is opposed to social hierarchy and reducing inequalities, it may use the government to do this," They have always used the government, hence they advocate for government expansion / bigger government.
    1
  42. @@abitmorerational "Wrong, rig ht w ing parties are those that essentially defend the status quo or wish to go back to some imagined reactionary past. They tend to defend existing social hierarchies" Wrong. That is called conservatism which is a relative political position, not left/right by itself.
    1
  43. @@abitmorerational "Those so-called "libertarian" parties are basically just hyper-right wing " They are far-right parties, well, anyone who advocates for Classical Liberalism would be a far-right party.
    1
  44. @@abitmorerational "Also, your hyper-specific definition of right wing isn´t one that´s generally accepted." The fundamental differences between left-wing and right-wing ideologies center around the the rights of individuals vs. the power of the government. Left-wing beliefs are based on the idea that society is best served with an expanded role for the government. People on the right believe that the best outcome for society is achieved when individual rights and civil liberties are paramount and the role — and especially the power — of the government is minimized.
    1
  45. @@abitmorerational : Nope.
    1
  46. @@abitmorerational "rig ht wi ng parties are never focussed on freedoms," You have never seen a rig ht wi ng party then, and such a thing hasn't existed in Finl and yet. Well, the small "Liberal party" is one actually.
    1
  47. Far-rig ht is barely a thing, in any country. Nobody wants to shrink the government these days.
    1
  48. "to extreme right fasc ists" Doesn't exist in Finland nor in reality. Extreme right would be Anarcho-Capita lism and fascists were far-left socia lists.
    1
  49. What "far right" parties?
    1
  50. "with the fa r-ri ght, " Doesn't ex ist in Finland.
    1