Comments by "Yazzam X" (@yazzamx6380) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1.  @mr.nihilz3283  - Give the time stamp where nine-eleven was mentioned in the topic video. If it wasn't mentioned, then stay on topic and answer my question please.
    4
  2. ​ @mr.nihilz3283  - This topic video is about Eddie's claims about the shape of the Earth and space, therefore my question to you (posted first) is ON topic, whereas your question to me is OFF topic. So answer my question please.
    4
  3.  @mr.nihilz3283  - Don't resort to being a coward please. I asked you a question FIRST that was completely on topic, therefore you need to answer my question otherwise you have no basis to demand answers to your own questions, much less to off topic questions. So grow up and participate here like an adult please. Do you think you can manage that? :-)
    4
  4. And there I was thinking "innocent until proven guilty" was important to everyone, but apparently not :-)
    4
  5.  @mantissmith5212  - So here you are admitting that you don't know that 8 inches per mile squared is the equation for a parabola hence proving my point perfectly, so thanks for that. Btw, I have a degree in mathematics, so go ahead and ask your mathematics teacher about 8 inches per mile squared, since your series of responses here shows you to be a child who has been triggered :-)
    4
  6.  @mantissmith5212  - To highlight my point, enter the following into your browser; Graph for 8 x squared So why do you think you see so many parabolas but no circles? :-)
    4
  7. Because you believe the Earth is flat?
    4
  8. Proof that the Earth is round goes back over 2200 YEARS!!! After all, do you REALLY believe that all those people who have sailed around the world and all those who have flown around the world, navigating the planet themselves using maps based upon a GLOBE Earth, are all somehow mistaken over the shape of the Earth? :-) Come on.
    4
  9.  @SuperMic00  - The globe model perfectly predicts eclipse start and end times and perfectly predicts/calculates the path of totality across the Earth's surface. That is a proven fact! Therefore claiming it's a theory when you know the predictions are accurate is rather dishonest of you :-) In contrast, the flat Earth model predicts absolutely nothing. CORRECTION - Flat Earth does predict one thing.... that certain flat Earth theorists will continue to grow richer thanks to the gullible ;-)
    4
  10. Nope. Next? Besides, Eric openly admits he doesn't know if his claimed flat Earth has an edge or if it has a dome, so why should he be chosen over other flat Earth theorists who say they do know? :-)
    4
  11. Can you say which version of a flat Earth you believe in please? Because there are many to choose from, i.e. dome or no dome? Edge or no edge? Infinite plane? Pillars or no pillars? Gravity or no gravity? Globe sun/moon or flat sun/moon? etc.
    4
  12. Come on, really? :-) Neil did NOT say the Earth literally looks like a pear, he says it's an oblate spheroid that is slightly bigger below the equator compared to above (hence the pear analogy) and says the difference overall is so small that the Earth is practically a perfect sphere. After all, if a friend said to you "I'm so hungry I could eat a horse", would you reply "Ok, but where can we buy horse meat around here?" :-) And we've known the Earth is a sphere for around 2500 years, and the first GLOBE showing the map of the Earth around it was made around 400 years ago!
    4
  13.  @StevEvil666  - You said "over my ass. There was not one thing that comes out of his mouth that is not a lie" Neil should say you're intelligent then ;-)
    4
  14. @Pedro Machado - Complete nonsense about Antarctica that you got from flat Earth theorists :-)
    4
  15. Eric doesn't debate those who challenge his claims, it's not worth the risk for him :-)
    4
  16. Give an example please, or go into detail over exactly what you're saying, because what you're saying appears to be a distortion of the facts, since it depends on WHERE on Earth at a given time. If you place a globe of the Earth at a distance and imagine your head to be the moon, then for EVERY location on the globe Earth that YOU can see, then any 'creature' on those locations can see you (the moon), even if they are on opposite sides of the globe. Whereas for the half of the globe that you can't see, then any 'creature' on that location wouldn't be able to see you. So it's very simple when you take the time to think about it :-)
    4
  17. What makes you think that NASA have a monopoly in space and therefore ALL photographs of the Earth from space comes from NASA? What's with the obsession with NASA among flat Earth believers? :-) Anyway, "sometimes show"? Are you referring to the claims about continents sizes in photographs of the Earth taken in space?
    4
  18. Which has nothing to do with him being right about the Earth being a globe, which is the main point here :-)
    4
  19.  @markhalpin4377  - In other words you heard about flat Earth and decided to jump onto the flat Earth 'bandwagon' to feel special, hence no evidence or model/version required. Thanks for the confirmation :-)
    4
  20. Because you believe the Earth is flat? :-|
    4
  21. NASA has provided ALL the information needed. Hence the answers are out there if you bother to look for it instead of listening to conspiracy theorists. It's not up to NASA or the 70+ other government space agencies worldwide or the numerous private space companies or the many satellite companies or the countless amateur and professional astronomers and astrophysicists worldwide etc to spoon feed the answers to you :-)
    4
  22.  @heavymetalnewsdesk  - Sarcasm is easy to miss :-)
    4
  23.  @yeysk828shgdy37  - Sure, just look at all the debates with flat Earth theorists that Eric Dubay has had over the years, including those he attacks just because they have different ideas about a flat Earth to his own - oh wait, there's none. I wonder why?
    4
  24. Space exists and it is a vacuum. All of that is proven whether or not you believe men landed on the moon. That knowledge about space didn't come from NASA which was formed in 1958, it comes from the science of Astronomy, a science that has been around for centuries :-|
    4
  25. The AE map is also known to most flat Earth believers as the Gleason map. Here's Alex Gleason's own words from his patent featuring the same Azimuthal Equidistant map (or AE map); Quote "The extorsion of the map from that of a globe consists, mainly in the straightening out of the meridian lines allowing each to retain their original value from Greenwich, the equator to the two poles". Therefore Gleason himself says the map was created from the globe of the Earth and he confirms the existence of two poles (i.e. North and South), and yet flat Earth believers claim the South Pole doesn't exist, right? :-) Therefore the AE map is not an accurate undistorted flat map of a flat Earth, it's just one of many 2D projections derived from the globe map of the Earth.
    4
  26. Neil doesn't debate flat Earth theorists for the same reason he doesn't waste his time debating Concave Earth theorists, or Hollow Earth theorists, or crop circle theorists, or ISS hoax theorists, or alien abduction theorists, or Electric Universe theorists, or UFO theorists, etc. So there's no reason for Neil to make flat Earth theorists a special case for debate. And Eric Dubay has never had an open debate with anyone who disagrees with his views. He doesn't even debate the flat Earth theorists that he publicly accused of working for the gvt to discredit flat Earth, such as Mark Sargent :-| Eric doesn't even attend flat Earth conferences to put himself in a position to be questioned. So on that basis alone it's never going to happen.
    4
  27. But you're not a flat Earth believer, surely... or are you?
    4
  28. The problem with your argument is that Eric Dubay has never had an open debate with anyone who disagrees with his views. Eric Dubay doesn't even debate the flat Earth theorists that he publicly accused of working for the gvt to discredit flat Earth, such as Mark Sargent :-| Eric Dubay doesn't even attend flat Earth conferences to put himself in a position to be questioned. The point is, there are no Eric Dubay debates that you can offer here to support the claim that he would be a challenge for anyone in a debate, much less to support the claim that Eric would be willing to take on such a challenge. After all, Eric says he doesn't even know if a flat Earth has a dome or if it has an edge, so how would he cope with a flat Earth theorist who says he knows there's a firmament dome and knows there's an edge? So by all means believe the Earth is flat if you want, but I don't get why so many flat Earth believers are putting Eric up on a high 'debating' pedestal that he hasn't earned :-|
    4
  29. For others reading this thread, here's proof of the Earth being a globe. The map of the Earth in the form of a globe is accurate, where we can easily work out the scale of the globe by dividing 24,900 (miles) by the measured length of the equator. For example, on a 12 inch globe it works out to be 26 miles per millimeter. You can now use the globe to accurately measure the distance between ANY two locations on Earth and it will be accurate. So on that 12 inch globe for example, a measurement of 23 millimeters will be 600 miles, and therefore for every two locations on Earth that are proven to be 600 miles apart, they will be 23 millimeters (2.3 centimeters) apart on that globe. That would be impossible if the shape of the Earth was wrong. We can do the same for maps of our cities because they are small enough to be relatively flat, and therefore we can all find maps of our cities with bar scales that indicates distances on that map. There are no flat maps of a flat Earth for which we can do the same, because ALL flat maps of the Earth are distorted.
    4
  30. The two are not comparable, why would you think they are? :-|
    4
  31. Actually we have been to the moon, landing men there 6 times from 1969 to 1972.
    4
  32. And should Neil also debate concave/hollow Earth theorists, alien UFO theorists, alien abduction theorists, spaceship moon theorists, ghost/spirit theorists, witchcraft theorists, paranormal theorists, electric universe theorists, alien crop circle theorists, etc, and hence give them the publicity and credence that they desperately seek? Why should Neil make flat Earth theorists a special case for debate compared to the theorists for other conspiracy claims out there (some of which I've listed above)? :-)
    4
  33. Wouldn't it require the agreement of both Joe and Eric to make that happen?
    4
  34. So, getting back to the topic... :-)
    4
  35. Is that your convoluted way of saying you believe the Earth is flat? :-)
    4
  36. Because you believe the Earth is flat?
    4
  37.  @nicmasemendoza8155  - For example?
    4
  38.  @nicmasemendoza8155  - A laughable claim that you got from flat Earth theorists (so you DO believe the Earth is flat!). The Earth rotates once per day, that's VERY slow, that's HALF the rotational speed of the hour hand on a watch/clock! So please explain why you want to take a video of something rotating so slowly? Would you film a clock or watch in real time for 24 hours? And if a friend starts spinning a basketball on his finger and asked you to guess how fast it's spinning, would you say something like "About 10 turns per second?" or would you say "Er, about 15 miles per hour?". So the fact that you parrot the flat Earth mantra of "spinning at 1000 mph" says it all :-)
    4
  39.  @nicmasemendoza8155  - Except I have done my homework kid, including owning and reading ALL the following flat Earth books; Zetetic Astronomy 2nd edition (1865) by Samuel Birley Rowbotham Zetetic Astronomy 3rd edition (1881) by Samuel Birley Rowbotham 100 Proofs That the Earth Is Not a Globe (1885) by William M Carpenter Is The Bible From Heaven, Is The Earth A Globe (1893) by Alex Gleason Zetetic Cosmogony (1899) by Thomas Winship Terra firma - The Earth is not a Planet (1901) by David Wardlaw Scott The Flat Earth Conspiracy (2014) by Eric Dubay 200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball by Eric Dubay (free eBook) The Greatest Lie on Earth - Proof That Our World Is Not A Moving Globe (2016) by Edward Hendrie So if (besides Eric Dubay's free eBook) you own any of the books above, then please quote what you consider to be the best flat Earth evidence from one of those books and lets discuss it here.
    4
  40.  @nicmasemendoza8155  - In other words you ran away from the debate, just as I expected :-) Here's another request (so will you run away from this one too?); State which version of a flat Earth you believe please, because there are many versions to choose from, i.e. dome or no dome? Edge (finite plane) or no edge (infinite plane)? Pillars or no pillars? Gravity or no gravity? Globe sun/moon or flat sun/moon? Rahu and Ketu, or just the moon? etc. Can you manage that? :-)
    4
  41. That's not what a theory means in science.
    4
  42. Sure, because flat Earth theorists and flat Earth believers constantly referring to others as indoctr1nated, sh1lls, puppets, sheep, agents, even globers etc and so much more, are not throwing insults at anyone, right? :-)
    4
  43. So you're saying you believe the Earth is flat? :-|
    4
  44. Because that's the way it should be with all due respect :-) Google/YouTube changed the search algorithm to prevent conspiracy videos from completely dominating search lists as they were for several years. In other words, if early last year I searched Google/YouTube for "Apollo moon landings" for example, then instead of a list mostly about the Apollo moon landings, that list would be completely dominated by Apollo HOAX videos. Following the changes, such a search is now dominated by links/videos about the Apollo moon landings, as requested. So now if you want to find conspiracy videos (moon landings, flat Earth, ISS hoax, etc) then you have to be more specific in your search, which is not difficult. Again, that's how it should be and hence Google/YouTube have simply redressed the balance. Oh and, the Earth is a globe. But before your '1 minute of explanation', please state which version of a flat Earth you believe in, since there are many to choose from, i.e. Dome or no dome? Edge or no edge? Pillars or no pillars? Globe sun/moon or flat sun/moon? Gravity or no gravity? etc.
    4
  45.  @valherustinger7848  - To prove me wrong, flat Earth believers like yourself need to; (a) Present two locations on Earth for which the distance measured on a globe of the Earth is different to the distance measured in the real world, where the margin of error doesn't explain the discrepancy, or (b) Present a flat map of the whole Earth which is to scale and has no distortion, meaning we can work out any distance on Earth just by measuring it on the flat map and then multiply that measurement by the scale (just like our flat town/city maps). I'd accept either (a) or (b), but both would be even better. After all, I'm sure you accept it is impossible to wrap an accurate map of your town or city around a globe without distorting it, and therefore it is impossible to represent your town or city accurately with a globe, since distances measured on that globe will be wrong. If the entire Earth was flat, then the same would be true, where it would be impossible to wrap a map of that Earth around a globe without distorting it, and therefore distances measured on that globe will be wrong. Only if the Earth is a globe can all the distances measured be correct, and that's what we have with globes of the Earth that any of us can own :-)
    4
  46. Why are flat Earth believers so obsessed with NASA? You do know that NASA were formed in 1958, right? The ancient Greeks knew the Earth was a globe around 2500 years ago, where one of them (Eratosthenes) measured the size of the globe Earth to good accuracy in 240 BC. Besides, which flat Earth do you believe? Dome or no dome? Edge or no edge? Gravity or no gravity? Pillars or no pillars? etc :-)
    4
  47. Firmament actually means heavens or sky. Flat Earth theorists took that word a step further to claim it means a solid dome.
    4
  48. Actually he has produced credible evidence for a globe. Btw, care to continue from where we left off in that thread? :-)
    4
  49.  @tobyncummins  - You said "the point of the debate is for a 3rdparty, ie the public, to witness it, balance logic and arguments, and then make a rational conclusion." Ok, but here's the problem, when has a debate ever happened among flat Earth theorists with different views of their flat Earth? See if you can find just one debate among flat Earth theorists who believe there's a dome and flat Earth theorists who don't believe there's a dome. Or a debate between FE theorists who think there's an edge and FE theorists who think it's an infinite plane. Or between FE theorists who think gravity exists and FE theorists who think gravity is a lie. Etc. My point is, if FE theorists are not willing to debate such details about the claimed flat Earth among themselves (to come to a consensus over a flat Earth model), then on what basis should any scientist waste his/her time debating those same FE theorists? Once flat Earth theorists must come to a consensus an established a flat Earth model that they can all agree on, THEN perhaps they would be ready to have their flat Earth model scrutinised by others and hence would be ready to debate something they can all agree on? :-)
    4
  50.  @SuckaFREE2.0  - Cut the nonsense please. I've been investigating Apollo hoax claims for over 10 years, hence I know EVERY Apollo hoax claim made and have debated practically EVERY claim online, so I know for a FACT that what you've just typed is untrue. For example, go ahead and NAME just ONE of the people who came forth as you claim. NAME the director (I hope you say Stanley Kubrick, lol :-)). Present links to support your claims.
    4