Comments by "Yazzam X" (@yazzamx6380) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1.  @SuckaFREE2.0  - In other words you were lying, so thanks for the indirect admission :-) In future, I suggest you stick to discussing subjects that you actually understand and above all, don't resort to lying to make your case.
    4
  2. But that's the problem, because you only think Antarctica is out of bounds because flat Earth theorists told you that. The South Pole is the only location in Antarctica that matters because all flat Earth theorists and flat Earth believers claim it doesn't exist. However, do a search on the web for South Pole Trips and notice what you find. That's right, you and any flat Earth believer who can afford it can book onto a trip to the South Pole in Antarctica! So wouldn't it be easier for just one flat Earth believer to go on such a trip to carry out any experiments needed on location to prove once and for all that the South Pole doesn't exist? Now ask yourself why no flat Earth theorist or flat Earth believer has ever done that :-)
    4
  3. Neil doesn't debate flat Earth theorists for the same reason he doesn't waste his time debating Concave Earth theorists, or Hollow Earth theorists, or crop circle theorists, or ISS hoax theorists, or alien abduction theorists, or Electric Universe theorists, etc. So there's no reason for Neil to make flat Earth theorists a special case for debate If Neil had a history of debating leading theorists of many other conspiracy claims, then sure you could argue he should do the same for flat Earth theorists. But that's not the case, therefore there's no reason for Neil to waste his time debating people who have their own view of reality and their own agendas, where their 'theories' has nothing to do with science and nothing to do with the scientific method :-|
    4
  4. Incorrect, because (like most conspiracy believers) flat Earth believers ONLY question official facts, hence it's completely one sided, i.e. biased. Questioning everything means EVERYTHING, including flat Earth claims, and yet despite different versions of a flat Earth being stated, 99.99% of the flat Earth believers I speak to never question any of the flat Earth claims made. It's good to ask questions, but it is not good to make up your own answers to your questions, and yet that's what so many flat Earth believers do :-|
    4
  5. Nope, it's flat Earth theorists like Eric Dubay who are clearly scared to debate scientists :-)
    4
  6. Hence the lies believed by flat Earth followers.
    4
  7.  @JudaismIslamUnited  - Show me someone who carried out your claimed experiment who later did exactly the same experiment on a moonless night, and then did it again on a cloudy night, and then again on a night with the moon, and so on, and after several repetitions found that the results observed only occurs when the moon is present :-) Oh and, make sure they also presented evidence to prove they couldn't fix the results please.
    4
  8.  @timid3000  - You said "It’s called perspective." Nonsense my friend :-) If what you claim was true, then we should able able to recreate the same effect on a flat surface (proven to be flat) and a camera to demonstrate perspective causing that same effect to happen with distance. The hull of a ship disappears first over the curvature of the Earth in the same way the bottom of a car disappears first as we see it drive away over the brow of a hill. Greater height allows us to see further across a curved surface, and hence it has nothing to do with the waves and perspective as you described, as the following footage of curvature of the sea/ocean demonstrates; www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKF7D7XsyTA www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9mRkNNwHjo www.youtube.com/watch?v=hROaZ9cyTO4 And these sure look like ships and boats vanishing bottom first over the curvature of the Earth's oceans/seas to me; www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3jus582qGc www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0ObTd7DLMw www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nUFLLUahSI After all, do you really buy into the flat Earth claim that once a ship appears to vanish over the curvature of the Earth that we can bring it back by zooming in with a camera or telescope?
    4
  9. In other words you believe the Earth is flat?
    4
  10. As others have stated here, Neil never agreed to any debate, therefore how can he run away from something he never agreed to in the first place? And Neil is an astrophysicist, hence claiming otherwise only makes you appear bitter and bias and uninformed. Also, before going any further, can you say which version of a flat Earth you believe please? Because there are many versions to choose from, i.e. dome or no dome? Edge or no edge (i.e. finite plane or infinite plane)? Pillars or no pillars? Gravity or no gravity? Globe sun/moon or flat sun/moon? Rahu and Ketu, or just the moon? etc.
    4
  11. Because anyone can deny if it suits them Nicole :-) For example, if someone told you duck-billed platypus are fake and insist there are no real photos of a platypus, then it doesn't matter how many photos or videos or films you provide showing duck-billed platypus, that person will dismiss them ALL as fake without evidence. So what do you do next? Hence there are literally thousands of photos of the Earth from space and yet no matter which ones you present, either on film or digital, they insist the photos are CGI, composites, even paintings. So what do you do next? What is amusing is that flat Earth believers never present any photos of their claimed edge of the Earth, or their claimed wall of ice up against the firmament dome. So if photos of the Earth wasn't required for them to believe the Earth is flat, then why would photos be required to convince them that the Earth is a globe? :-)
    4
  12. You said "Long Live Christ" With all due respect, if you believe the Earth is flat then you're not the Christian that you believe yourself to be :-|
    4
  13. Show me just one debate between flat Earth theorists with different ideas about a flat Earth :-) Anyway, given that you appear to be a flat Earth believer, can you say which version of a flat Earth you believe please? A brief summary in your own words would suffice. I ask because there are many versions to choose from, i.e. dome or no dome? Edge (finite plane) or no edge (infinite plane)? More land and seas beyond the ice wall? Pillars or no pillars? Gravity or no gravity? Globe sun and moon or flat sun and moon? Rahu and Ketu, or just the moon? etc. Once you say which flat Earth you mean, then your comments here will be in context of your flat Earth.
    4
  14. True, but 'they' were not scientists :-)
    4
  15. What exactly is stopping Eric Dubay from contacting numerous science shows and channels to debate his flat Earth theories with them? If Eric had done that over the YEARS and they refused, then he would have been shouting it out from the rooftops! But he clearly hasn't, and therefore Eric Dubay is the only coward here :-)
    4
  16.  @houbice3  - Joe is talking about the specific claims that Eddie is making, not about what governments do or do not say in general. For example, if Eddie was claiming atoms are a lie told to us by governments then it doesn't make it true just because governments lie, Eddie would need to explain how and why it would help governments to lie about atoms.
    4
  17.  @raymondwandell8880  - You said "I think the suction of a vacuum ..." A vacuum isn't suction :-|
    4
  18. Because you think the Earth is flat?
    4
  19.  @seanbyrne910  - Why can't you answer my simple question? If you don't know whether your claimed flat Earth has a dome or not then just say so. If you don't know whether your claimed flat Earth has an edge or not then just say so. If you don't know whether your claimed flat Earth has a globe sun and moon or flat sun and moon then just say so. If you don't know whether your claimed flat Earth has gravity or not then just say so... Once I know which flat Earth you believe in, THEN we can discuss the evidence that proves the Earth is a globe (which is actually rather easy to prove btw :-)).
    4
  20. ​ @seanbyrne910  - In other words you are clueless about the very thing you say you believe, i.e. the flat Earth. Thanks for the admission. :-) Your ignorance is proven further by your obsession over NASA, where you seem to think the Earth being known to be an oblate spheroid came from NASA when in fact that knowledge emerged in the 16th and 17th CENTURY, thanks to people like Newton and Huygens (it was described in theory by Newton in his famous work Principia). So we've known the Earth is an oblate spheroid for around 300 years and known the Earth was a globe for almost 2500 years (with the Earth's diameter first measured accurately by Eratostheses in 240 BC). Therefore try letting go of your NASA obsession and hatred just because of the flat Earth theorists you blindly believed and try looking at the facts :-)
    4
  21.  @BoBwikCruz  - You said "enoch walked with GOD and was TAken by GOD." So let me guess, God said to Enoch "Don't get me wrong, I love your work but... it's not really suitable for my Bible"? :-| But seriously, the book of Enoch has been used by certain flat Earth theorists to push their beliefs, nothing more and nothing less.
    4
  22.  @Sdhanbir  - Neil was making the point that the Earth is not a perfect sphere, that it's flattened slightly at the poles and hence it's an oblate spheroid... but... even that oblate spheroid is distorted a little because the Earth bulges out a fraction more in the south compared to the north, like a pear, where he made the point that the distortion overall is so small that and I quote "cosmically speaking, we're practically a perfect sphere". Conspiracy theorists (in particular flat Earth theorists) took Neil's 'pear shape' reference and distorted what Neil was saying, but the fact remains that Neil used a pear as an example to explain how the Earth was fatter in the south compared to the north, he wasn't saying the Earth literally looks pear shaped :-) I hope that helps.
    4
  23.  @syashadeed7552  - And yet you STILL cannot or will not describe the version of a flat Earth you believe. Why is that? What are you afraid of? :-) (And again it is "You're welcome" not "Your welcome"!!!).
    4
  24. Yep, and hence the complete lack of an accurate flat map of a flat Earth where all the countries are the correct shapes and sizes, and where all distances directly measured on that map are correct, proves the Earth is not flat :-)
    4
  25. 7 seconds in and there's nothing to blow anyone's mind. 30 seconds in and still nothing. Made up claims is not evidence my friend. Anyone can do it, including you, where it then comes down to how many people will fall for it, as you have :-|
    4
  26.  @nas0ng  - Don't lie to yourself please. I posted "But aren't you a flat Earth believer?" for which you responded with "Aren’t you an idiot?" So you started the abusive comments here. That's why I said you were easily triggered in response and you replied with more abuse. I then tried to move onto a more reasonable discussion with my reply "Great, so you're not a flat Earth believer, so why the unnecessary rudeness?...." But all you offered were yet more insults, eg. "I’m in awe of how dumb your question is." So I made the effort to move away from such a negative and pointless exchange but you were having NONE of it. Therefore as I said, I see no value in this discussion.
    4
  27.  @nas0ng  - You said "We all stand in awe of your towering intellect!!!" Likewise :-) So again, and finally, I wish you, your family and your friends all the best in these difficult times. Bye.
    4
  28. Sure, Eric the yoga teacher who says he doesn't know if his flat Earth has a dome and doesn't know if his flat Earth has an edge :-)
    4
  29.  @yugoboss2679  - Nope, it only shows how clueless Eric Dubay is, where ALL of his "200 proofs" have been debunked (many of which YOU could debunk yourself if you actually tried!). Besides, why support a guy who says Hitler was a man of peace and wrongfully demonised by historians? Eric is a Nazi sympathizer who says the Holocaust was a hoax! 🤔
    4
  30. No, you've merely highlighted people who can't think for themselves much less listen. Neil didn't say the Earth is LITERALLY shaped like a pear, he used a pear as an analogy for the slight distortion in the shape of the Earth, a distortion that we cannot see with the naked eye :-|
    4
  31.  @superstevetruegamer1  - You said "All I can say is everything else that they've told us has been a |ie" But there |ies the problem my friend (pun intended :-)). Conspiracy theorists do not care about the truth, they only care about convincing people of their version of the truth, and so they deliberately put doubts in peoples minds, especially with regards to the classic monsters of "them" and "they".
    4
  32. Complete nonsense from start to finish :-) For example you said "The united nations symbol is the flat earth map" Nope, it's a silhouette version of the Azimuthal Equidistant 2D projection map (or AE map), also known to FE believers as the Gleason map, which is just one of MANY 2D projection maps of the globe Earth. Flat Earth believers adopted than map because it happens to stretch Antarctica around the outside of the map and hence you claim that to be the wall of ice. That's the ONLY reason! However, the AE/Gleason map only works when interpreted as a 2D projection of a GLOBE Earth via the lines of latitude and longitude, but it completely falls apart when interpreted as a literal representation of a flat Earth (just look at Australia for example, which is twice as wide as it should be and shaped like a sausage :-)). To this day, despite over 150 years of flat Earth books, there is no ACCURATE map of a flat Earth in existence. Seriously, present a link to an accurate flat map of your flat Earth where all the countries are the correct shape, the correct size and where all the distances are correct. You said "We live under a firmament" Great, then state the height of your claimed firmament dome, because no flat Earth theorist in history has ever stated that figure despite claiming to know the size and the altitude of the sun and the moon :-) Eric Dubay is a charlatan where EVERY one of his 200 proofs have been debunked. Anyway, you believe in God but you're clearly not a Christian, so what are you exactly?
    4
  33. Keep pointless politics out of this please.
    4
  34. Truth matters, facts matters, they always have and they always will. The moment you're willing to abandon that idea is the moment you're willing to abandon reason. Gut feeling didn't produce the technology you used to post your replies here, science did. And our senses are not perfect, they are easily fooled (hence optical illusions for example) and so we make instruments and tools to take measurements for us and to allow us to detect what our senses cannot.
    4
  35. What has that got to do with his expertise in astrophysics? What has that got to do with the Earth being a globe? :-|
    4
  36. So, getting back to the topic of the shape of the Earth... :-)
    3
  37. Why must he debate Eric? What's so special about Eric Dubay? And he is an astrophysicist, i.e. a real scientist. So why the denial?
    3
  38. 😂
    3
  39. Hmmm, an account less than 3 weeks old :-)
    3
  40. In other words you believe the Earth is flat? :-|
    3
  41.  @q-m-q1362  - You said "How's that going to add to your life?" Likewise, since you are the person who started this thread, not me, remember? You said "He exercised his freewill to decline the invitation. But never gave any real reason why." Neil doesn't debate flat Earth theorists for the same reason he doesn't waste his time debating Concave Earth theorists, or Hollow Earth theorists, or crop circle theorists, or ISS hoax theorists, or alien abduction theorists, or Electric Universe theorists, or UFO theorists, etc. So why should Neil make flat Earth theorists a special case for debate? If Neil had a history of debating leading theorists of many other conspiracy claims (including the conspiracy theories that you don't believe yourself) then sure you could argue he should do the same for flat Earth theorists. But that's not the case, therefore there's no reason for Neil to waste his time debating people who have their own view of reality and their own agendas, where their 'theories' has nothing to do with science and nothing to do with the scientific method :-|
    3
  42.  @amirankalandadze3230  - You said "So, Neil is incorrect and Nasa photoshoped balls are real?" Pretending to be stupid doesn't make your point, it only supports my point (but hey, if you're not pretending... ;-)). If you created a perfect model of the Earth that stood 3 meters high (300 cm, or about 10 feet), then it will bulge out slightly at the equator by 1 cm, and hence would be 300 cm high and 301 cm wide. That is an oblate spheroid, but to the naked eye and in photographs and video your model Earth will look like a perfect sphere, just like photographs of the Earth from space. Also, due to the distribution of lands and seas, the Earth actually bulges out a fraction more in the South compared to the North (by about 1 mm on your 300 cm model), hence the pear shape comparison that is too small to be seen with the naked eye, so again your model Earth will look like a perfect sphere, just like photographs of the Earth from space. Next? :-)
    3
  43.  @pgomez2383  - You said "Dubay is the face of flat earth why not smash him and stop more from joining..." Should Neil also debate concave/hollow Earth theorists, alien UFO theorists, alien abduction theorists, spaceship moon theorists, ghost/spirit theorists, witchcraft theorists, paranormal theorists, electric universe theorists, alien crop circle theorists, etc, and hence give them the publicity and credence that they desperately seek? Why should Neil make flat Earth theorists a special case for debate compared to the theorists for other conspiracy claims out there (some of which I've listed above)? :-)
    3
  44.  @pgomez2383  - You said "How about you go debate Dubay be the bigger man DeGrasse!" How about you explain why Neil should treat flat Earth theorists different to theorists of other conspiracy theories, and explain why you appear to be in support of Dubay (are you a flat Earth believer?). You said "Instead of asking me get off your lazy ass and find out what they are talking about!!" As you can see from my flat Earth library (which is EASY to prove if YOU own ANY of those books), I do know what I'm talking about kid, unlike yourself where you claim there are some interesting flat Earth 'facts' and yet you lack the backbone to state just ONE of those so-called interesting facts. So stop being a coward, put your money where your mouth is and give us an example of a flat Earth claim that you consider to be an interesting 'fact' that hasn't been debunked. I'm waiting :-)
    3
  45. Now say that without looking in the mirror :-)
    3
  46.  @richardwagner4285  - Great, then please say which version of a flat Earth you believe. A brief summary in your own words would suffice. I ask because there are many versions to choose from, i.e. dome or no dome? Edge (finite plane) or no edge (infinite plane)? More land and seas beyond the ice wall? Pillars or no pillars? Gravity or no gravity? Globe sun and moon or flat sun and moon? Rahu and Ketu, or just the moon? etc. Once you say which flat Earth you mean, then your comments here will be in context of your flat Earth.
    3
  47. Then how much would Mount Everest protrude if the globe Earth was shrunk down to the size of a cue ball?
    3
  48.  @lordmavbmp  - Ok, but isn't your real problem with Neil more down to the fact that you believe the Earth is flat? :-)
    3
  49.  @lordmavbmp  - Thanks for your reply, but you highlight the heart of problem... which is just how easy it is for conspiracy theorists to convince people of almost anything as long as they claim it has something to do with gvts or scientists or other authorities, where from that point onwards everything the conspiracy theorists say is taken as the absolute truth :-|
    3
  50.  @lordmavbmp  - People have known the Earth is a globe for around 2500 years, for example the ancient Greeks and Romans, and all Christian churches throughout history have only ever said the Earth is a globe, no Christian church has ever said the Earth is flat. The only difference is all those I listed above believed in a stationary globe Earth at the center of the everything for most of their history. In other words, our knowledge that the Earth is a globe did not come from gvts my friend.
    3