Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. So what's Dubay's excuse for why he refuses to debate any of his challengers?
    5
  2. Maqua, photographs are not size accurate. The objects in them will grow and shrink depending on what lens you use, with wide angle lenses like Apollo used making background objects smaller than they actually are. By the way, the moon is actually tiny compared to the amount of space it takes up in the sky. The Earth would mathematically appear slightly larger than a quarter at arm's length to the naked eye, just saying. It would not fill the sky, your doubt is based on a lie. Just remember, the world you find at the bottom of that rabbit hole is just a dream, it's not real.
    5
  3. Said Flat Earther parades around going "Yeah, he totally ran away from me", then blacklists anybody that goes "I'll take you on instead" because the only reason he accepted the challenge was because he knew that Neil wouldn't.
    5
  4. Tyson is one man. Why does Dubay hide in his channel, refusing to debate ANYBODY and deleting comments and banning people when he and his cronies get caught lying? If Youtube didn't allow channel owners to delete comments and ban people, Eric Dubay would have shit his pants so much he'd no longer be potty trained.
    5
  5. Did you know that it's been proven that basketballs are flat? If you zoom in on them close enough, the curvature disappears.
    4
  6. If you posted a link, it probably got marked as spam. Youtube's system is screwy like that and has been ultra buggy since about April.
    4
  7. You know that stock plot where the loser gets people to go to an event by promising that X important person will be there without actually asking them first? That, except that Neil got annoyed and told him to fuck off. Meanwhile, Eric Dubay gets challenged on a regular basis. He never debates anybody and routinely blocks and bans people that challenge him because he's absolutely terrified of losing his perfect record of "By Default".
    4
  8. About the "truth's protective layers"> That's exactly what it is.
    3
  9. .... have you bothered looking at how much it's supposedly pear-shaped by? It's less than 50 miles. You aren't going to see a deviation of only 1-2% on a photo unless your name is Superman.
    3
  10.  @PMunk  Also, by the way, American Moon is NOT respected. That's the video that got caught being so dishonest that they tried to pass off attributed artwork as "Apollo photographs" to "analyze". And just as a head's up, you should not trust anything Massimo Mazzucco tells you. He's a scam artist. Before getting into Apollo, he made his money shilling fake medicine and got rich off of peoples' deaths.
    3
  11. Eric Dubay doesn't want to debate anybody. Are you man enough to tell your master to accept the recent challenge? 10,000 dollars AND the ability to video tape him deleting a channel. Come on, why is he afraid? Why are YOU afraid to challenge him to it?
    3
  12. Assert without proof Quote bible Call anybody that disagrees a NASA shill Delete comments and ban people that call you out when you're wrong. Those four?
    3
  13. If we made the Earth and a cue ball the same size, the mountains wouldn't amount to much more than the chalk.
    3
  14. You have spoken with God? Really? I hope God agrees with that claim come judgement time, because if you falsely claim to speak for him, you will be damned for eternity.
    3
  15. ​ @davidhale8177  The term "Far East" came into popular usage from Great Britain expanding their empire past India to the far reaches of Asia in the 1800s. It has nothing to do with the shape of the Earth. Far West would be the New World.
    2
  16. So fun fact. If you have an object revolve around another object while spinning, the number of times that it points a specific direction is always either one more or one less than the number of times that point points that the object in the center, depending on whether the rotation and revolution are in the same direction or opposite directions for any n rotations over 1. (1 rotation, same direction, would be tidal locked like the moon) Clockwise/Clockwise or Counterclockwise/Counter clockwise 4 rotations during one revolution will point at the sun 3 times in the time it takes to return to its original position (when the moving object is at 120, 240, and 360 degrees). 10 rotations, 9 points. 100 rotations, 99. CW/CCW or CCW/CW will point 5 times for 4 rotations at 72, 144, 216, 288, and 360 degrees, 11 points for for 10, 101 for 100 etc. You're welcome to count. This means that calculate it by formula without any sort of messy "guessing to make it work." It's awfully convenient that whatever cosmic being set up the Flat Earth was kind enough to follow that same pattern.
    2
  17. I mean.... your leaders include a pervert that drinks his own urine and a man that writes songs of worship for a mass murderer.
    2
  18. "You know that contemporary NASA astronauts have asserted that they cannot transgress the Van Allen Radiation Belt because they can't launch a craft sufficiently shielded to protect human cargo through the Belt against the the planetary amount of radiation, due to the required weight of the necessary shielding." Um, no..... that's a claim asserted by YOU PEOPLE, not anybody that's actually remotely related to NASA's astronauts. You insist the shielding must be lead because you know nothing about how radiation actually works beyond what is told on Saturday morning cartoons. There are multiple types of radiation. Lead is for X and Gamma radiation. The belts are beta radiation. Beta radiation requires LOW-DENSITY, lightweight shielding, because it creates secondary radiation when it hits heavy matter. That same process, where particle radiation is shot as a piece of heavy metal, is how your dentist creates their x-rays in the first place. ---------- Also, by the way, the issue they're having isn't radiation poisoning. It's damage to the on-board computers, because modern machines use a completely different type of hardware technology. Nobody's used magnetic core memory in 50 years.
    2
  19. I'm going to spoil some mystery for you. Kubrick changed the number of the room because the hotel they filmed at requested they use a number they didn't have to avoid losing money if squeamish customers refused to stay in the room.
    2
  20. You do realize that the Nazis were anti-socialist in policy and only took the name and some talking points that to win votes with their fingers crossed right? I'm guessing you believe that Kim Jong Un is a democratically elected president, right? After all, North Korea is a democratic people's republic. It's there in the name so it most be true!
    2
  21.  @squirrel4421  Please. Eric picked one fight he knew wouldn't go through and claimed that as his first, last, and only victory because he's not willing to risk anything but winning by default.
    2
  22. No, he didn't. He's referring to the model simulations that were played alongside the radio chatter as they landed because... you know... there were no cameras outside the ship watching them land it.
    2
  23. Chris, the flag is "flying" because it has a rod through the top of it keeping it erect. It really only actually moves when the astronauts are handling it, otherwise it just hangs there like a shower curtain. Also, the moon is lacking air, not gravity.
    2
  24.  @yeysk828shgdy37  Alien, Dubay only agreed because he knew that Tyson wouldn't show up. When ANYBODY ELSE challenges him, he refuses and bans anybody that challenges him on his channel. It's hard to "destroy" anybody when the only type of victory he's willing to attempt is "By default".
    2
  25.  @ninjacrypt5795  Ninja.... First of all, claiming that "many" rocks were proven fake is a blatant lie. It was ONE rock and the "fake rock" wasn't even NASA's. It was a completely unrelated rock that was ASSUMED to be moon rock purely based on when it was received (despite being a year before the moon landings were given out) and then donated without being appraised. The astronauts were given a payload allotment to bring whatever (reasonable) personal possessions they wanted. Aldrin brought a communion set. Armstrong brought boy scout memorabilia or flags or something dignified (I don't remember what it was). The golf equipment was from that personal payload. It was not in place of anything so don't pretend that it was. You can't receive radio from China without a satellite in part because there's a billion tons of rock called "the curvature of the Earth" in the way. The golf cart extends the range you can move away from the ship and allows you to transport equipment and samples over distance. Anybody that doesn't think this is beneficial has their head up their ass. We see stars from the Earth AT NIGHT. The Apollo missions happened during the DAY and the lunar daytime is two weeks long. Photographs of the stars use long exposure times of several seconds long that, if you tried to use them in sunlight, would render everything in the foreground overexposed and unusable because brightly it photographs use exposure times of less than 1/100th of a second. Your precious "truther" cult leaders are well-aware of this, but continue to pretend this is an issue because lying is much easier. By the way, Apollo 16 took ultraviolet photographs using a telescope. They were determined to have come from the moon. The hoaxers will never, ever tell you about that.
    2
  26. I mean... they already knew about the "deadly radiation stopping it". They would have known six months in advance during Apollo 8.
    2
  27. You know, from what I've heard, Tyson "chickened out" because Rogan tried to schedule him without his permission. Meanwhile, Eric not only refuses to debate ANYBODY that will actually show, but also deletes comments and bans people that dare criticize and challenge him because how dare "critical thinkers" not be brainless obedient sheep. That's speaking at the volume of a hurricane.
    2
  28.  @Mr.TomMoon  For fuck's sake. Rockets do not push on things. Tom, there is a law of physics called the Conservation of Momentum where the total momentum of a system (mass * velocity) remains constant unless an outside force alters it. This is for all parts of that system combined This means that as rocket loses mass, it will gain speed relative to how much mass it loses and what speed and direction it lost in. They work by mass manipulation, NOT by pushing on shit. This is why rocket engines are shaped like hourglasses: because there's another principle of fluid mechanics called "choked flow" that causes gasses and liquids to speed up when they travel through a narrow opening.
    2
  29.  @Mr.TomMoon  ..... so are you saying that vacuums have the ability to nullify one of the fundamental laws of physics?
    2
  30. First public color TV broadcast was a recording of the famous opera Carmen in 1953, 16 years before the moon landings.
    2
  31. That would depend on what you fuel is. Not all substances produce visible flame or smoke when they burn. Indy car racing has had problems with invisible pit fires because alcohol fires are pretty much impossible to see in sunlight.
    2
  32. Then why do the conspiracy theorists need to keep lying about their evidence? Surely your critical thought should be able to work that out.
    2
  33.  @daryllect6659 No, you're lying about YOUR evidence that it was fake. Bart Sibrel got caught editing his "faking the distance" video to remove parts of it that disproved him David Percy cropped details out of photographs and lied about his playback speeds when showing the "slow motion" - which accidentally got proven by Jarrah White being a dumbass and recording himself unable to do fifth grade math. The "Coke bottle lady" forgot when fabricating her story that Australia is ~12 hours off from the UK she really lives in and tried to lie about "staying up late" to watch something at 11 AM in her time zone. "Photographic Expert" Jack White invented his own anomalies using creative cropping and deliberately placed his comparison marks on top of details he wanted to hide. One your "scientists", I can't remember the name of, faked his radiation and heat studies proofs by deliberately misrepresenting the conditions he was testing against. American Moon tried to pass off attributed composite artwork as "Apollo photographs" to "analyze" in full knowledge they were created decades later. Etc etc etc etc etc Go on, "Critical Thinker". Explain.
    2
  34.  @daryllect6659  ...... I'm talking about the "proof that it was faked". Or did the other hoaxers not tell you that every single one of your leaders is a proven fraud? Cropped and altered photos, artwork passed off as originals, videos edited to skip over disproving details, lying about the speed you "correct" the "slow motion" to, faked experiments, scientists and researchers that don't exist....... Surely you have an explanation for that, right? I tried to post several of them, but the comment got eaten again.
    2
  35. The flag has a rod through the top of it. It's hanging like a shower curtain.
    2
  36. Siiiigh. Flat Earthers really don't get it, do you? Down is not the bottom of the ball. Down is the CENTER of the ball.
    2
  37. No, it wasn't. The real reason that the room number was changed is because the hotel they filmed at didn't want real numbers used because they were afraid of losing business if squeamish customers refused to stay in the room.
    2
  38.  @andresbetancourt8561  Question. Are Flat Earthers and conspiracy theorists all high school dropouts? Your spelling is atrocious and none of you ever seem to use paragraphs. ------------ "Water wld never be calm. " You've never ordered a drink on an airplane without ice, have you? Amazing how it sits almost perfectly calm and doesn't instantly slosh out of the cup at 500 miles per hour. By the way, the spinning is about 1000 mph, not 65000 -------- "Guess my hand must be bigger lol" Of course it is. After all, the size that objects appear in relation to one another is how big they are! It looks like it is, so it must be. Or.... would you prefer to admit that you were lying when you said that appearing the same size meant they were? ------------- "Why wldnt buzz Aldridge or Neil Armstrong say we landed on the moon?" Because the man that asked them to swear, Bart Sibrel, is a convicted criminal that harassed them to the point that the police had to be called for stalking and trespassing. Why do you people lie pretend that three of the other astronauts (Gene Cernan, Edgar Mitchell, and Alan Bean) didn't swear on your Bible or make excuses to why they don't count? Pretty obvious that you're the real satanists. -------------- You do realize that the farther an object is away from you, the less its position changes as you move right? Meaning that you would need to move an astronomically far distance to change the position of an object that is trillions of miles away, right? And that the model you are arguing against straight-up says the other stars are moving in roughly the same speed and direction that we are, so will stay in position with each other like soldiers marching in formation, right? So why do you people pretend that the movement is supposedly random? --------- "We landed in the moon and go to Mars but we can't hover over the north pole?" .... yes, because a satellite in orbit requires it to continuously move forward to counteract gravity pulling it down otherwise it will come back to the ground. To quote it like the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, it's essentially throwing yourself at the ground and missing. Geosynchronous orbit creates the illusion of it hovering by having the speed it's moving match the earth's rotation. You can't do that over the poles. Satellites work on science and math, not making shit up and declaring it to be the divine truth that must never be questioned because God Says So. ---------- "And where the fuck did they get that number??" First of all, it's not a trillion miles so the answer is "You pulled it out of your ass" Second, do you know "parallax" is? And not just the Marvel character? It's the measurable difference in size, position, and angle of an object as you move. You can take two or more locations you know the distance between and measure the change in an object to tell how far away it is. By the way, parallax bends your "true model" over a table like a rich man's maid. If the sun, moon, and stars were only a few thousand miles or less, it'd be very obvious because the star circles would be squashed into ovals as you move South and the moon would show more than 90 degrees of rotation between England and the Falkland Islands. Do they look like they're close? Fuck no, they don't. ----------- "Where are the stars in that infamous moon landing. We can see stars from earth but there not there in moon pic?" ..... because the Apollo footage is DAYTIME, you dolt. Cameras have a setting that controls how much light you let in. The proper settings to avoid all of your brightly lit foreground objects in direct sunlight being overexposed is typically about 1/100th of a second or less, while stars are filmed with long exposure shots of several seconds. That's why most pictures of city skylines or the moon at night, from Earth, typically don't have stars in them either. Hint hint. --------- "And you believe that? All I can say to you sheep is bah bah bah bah." Says the person who thinks they're so smart yet lies about the numbers and hasn't an original thought in their head. ========= Edit: My bad, Parallax is DC, not Marvel.
    2
  39. Because he's not a scientist of geology?
    2
  40.  @FDupp-og1mi  .... why would it crush you? Furthermore, you do realize that gravity's formula explicitly exerts greater force on heavier objects and less force on smaller ones because the mass of the two objects is multiplied together right? News flash: Electrostatic Force works the same way. It's the exact same formula with mass replaced with charge and a different constant. Also, you realize that buoyancy works by the air being pulled down too and pushing the lighter materials out of the way, right? That's why objects don't float when the fluid is weightless or in freefall. I guess they're falling too because they're more dense than a medium they're not even adjacent too? I wonder how that works....
    2
  41.  @FDupp-og1mi  I would assume it has to do with the amount of water, with it only affecting a very small amount and that adding up over a very large area. What causes the high tide to be directly under the moon and directly opposite it on your fake Flat Earth? Is it "It just does" or "Shut up and stop asking questions brainwashed sheeple?"
    2
  42. There's a second hatch in the nose of the ship where it connects to the LEM.
    2
  43. ​ @dubrulphilippe3815  Religion, the Bible, and the Church would never, ever lie to you either.
    2
  44. You know what's pretty pathetic? Dubay only agreed to debate because he knew that Tyson wouldn't show. When anybody else challenges him, he immediately blacklists anybody that calls him out for being wrong and refuses all takers. Go on, go crawl back to him and ask him directly why he doesn't debate and why he won't take McToon's challenge. Ten thousand dollars to sit on a plane AND the opportunity to publicly delete the channel and he still goes screaming from the room when it's brought up. I wonder why.... So much brown nosing of a man that shits his pants when challenged that I'm not entirely sure that Flat Earthers aren't just perverts with a scat fetish.
    2
  45. Eric Dubay doesn't debate anybody. He challenged Neil solely because he knew Neil would refuse, and refuses to tarnish his perfect record of "By Default". He's so afraid of having to actually defend his position that he actively bans people the criticize his videos. That's why his comment section is nothing but ass kissing.
    2
  46.  @jibteenuc9836  Care to point me to a single debate he's actually done? He's been challenged quite a few times. He was also challenged last year to get on a plane with one of the debunkers and fly one of the flights he claims doesn't exist. 10,000 dollars set aside in a legally binding contract and the chance to film himself deleting the debunker's youtube account. He shat his pants and ran away. Go to his comment section and call him out on something. The bigger the lie, the better. Go debunk his Apollo claims, or ask him why his "lighthouses visible too far" provides no actual proof that the lighthouses are actually visible at those distances, or the fact that he keeps using Bart Sibrel's work ten years after Bart got caught faking evidence and the same "stars moving above the Flat Earth" animation even though he knows damn well that the southern stars do NOT move like that. Go call him out directly to his face about the fact that his buddies in Level tried to openly scam the audience with their "you can't see the light source from the darkness" demonstration - where the camera is in darkness because the rim of the flashlight is between the camera and the bulb, blocking the light. If he actually responds, keep at it. Let me know how long your comment stays there. You won't, because no Flat Earther would dare bite their master's hand.
    2
  47. .... um, traffic lights can tell whether there's cars or not. They can have infrared detectors or pressure plates, though many particularly in cities are simply set to timers. If you have a problem with it, go write a letter to your city council for being cheapskates. That ain't NASA's problem.
    2
  48. You mean when he said that they didn't go back because of money?
    2
  49. .... but radiation doesn't cook things like that. It causes nerve death and blood vessel hemorrhaging and you waste away from dehydration as you vomit and shit out all your fluids. The Chicken of the Sea isn't chicken. It's tuna, that's why this post smells so fishy.
    2
  50.  @Trig-mm4rt  Go on, little boy. Go ask your precious Eric why he refuses to debate anybody. Keep hounding him until he gives a good answer. We'll see how long it takes you to ban you.
    2