Comments by "s H" (@sH-ed5yf) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

  1. Only about 1200 are fighter aircraft
    1
  2. Ah that is why the now have to buy wapons from north korea and Iran. Tell when they found this 1.5 Mio. Winter uniforms
    1
  3. It has been war since day war
    1
  4.  @jd5787  wow quiet easy to laugh sbout that claim. Clip of launching su34 a mounth ago. Channel the sun. Clearly seeing anti air missles there. Every aircraft carries anti air missles just in case even saudi arabian bombing their neighbor.
    1
  5.  @jd5787  since the russian retreat of kiew they barly made huge adnavces. And now they are at where they used to be 4 mounth ago, but with much less equipment, poor moral and a supirior ukrainian army in Front of them.
    1
  6.  @jd5787  You canot even dare to call a war a war. You are not in russia where you have to fear police comming to you for that. Just say war and the spirit of truth will come to you.
    1
  7.  @jd5787  still no proof for your 2 million claim but i take that as a point for myself.
    1
  8.  @jd5787  but what is the source for your falsch Informationen I am courioss.
    1
  9.  @jd5787  oh wow that is impresive. Except it is not true. They plan to increase the number to over a million in the next years. But this takes time and if the equipment is barly enough and funktional now, what do you think they will have when they increase their military. I mean. Even know they already reliy on t62s and 50 year old trucks and su24 aircraft.
    1
  10.  @jd5787  you clearly do not know anything. Russian army consists roughly 900.000 men. But only about 250.000 are combat troops. Take the losses wounded out and those who have to protest russian borders and you see that russia is on the Limit.
    1
  11. Overused shill argument. Nobody claimed that in the first weeks. But indeed they ran out of man so they had to mobilise. They did run out of missles so they had ro build new ones and buy from iran and north korea
    1
  12. Did you even watched the video?
    1
  13. Eho is they. And no most people didnt. But finally it became true. Now they buy from north kores
    1
  14. So what excactly is there to cope in counting guns on pictires
    1
  15. @bybenzo9699  wow. You know nothing my boy apperently. What equipmentlies, is consistent temperature and dry air. The excact oposite of siberia. Get educated
    1
  16. @genchebanu  those experts are well aware of all of those words. Yes they Form New units and yes they they bring back old stocks of equipment. But it the Reduktion pf depot stocks of over 60 percent speaks a clear language. Russia is scraping the Barrel and the depots run dry sooner or later
    1
  17. @genchebanu  you have seen them using newly produced ones? Did you saw the production date on them while flying. In actuallity the russian missle production reached a hight of over 100 klibre and KH101. So quiet high. Apperently they empfiehlt there depots in late Februar. Of 2023. Accourding to american intellegence anyway...
    1
  18. @genchebanu  well they did run out of missles in 2023. Then they started hige production lines. When we say they run out of missles, we mean the stockpiles dry up.
    1
  19.  @genchebanu  russia uses a dozen different barrels from guns produced in the 40s 50s and 60s. Just launch a production line for those is not as easy as it sounds.
    1
  20.  @genchebanu  I did it myself in military service my boy. But the problem is most of those Systems are not produced anymore and have to be cnabalised for others
    1
  21. Not if most remaining guns are in Bad shape
    1
  22. ​ @stone1er371 sure thing mate. They just love to buy inaccuarate and low quality ammo with International backlash. They used their own stockpiles and dried them up over 2 years. Its that simple
    1
  23.  @engineerenginering8633  wellappetently not. Otherwise the would habe won long time ago
    1
  24.  @nematolvajkergetok5104  not a mystery. YT deletes links in comments for Spam protection.
    1
  25. In actuallity russia is down from 60.000 shells a day in 2022 to less then 10.000 in 2024
    1
  26. Well nobody said this to begin with.
    1
  27.  @joelfisk  The guardian. You misrepresent the article. It says 50% of its initial invasion force/ tanks At that time russia lost more then 700 tanks. That is more then half of the Initial invasion force. So correct..
    1
  28.  @joelfisk  I should have been more specific. Nobody, whoms opinion matters and understands something about the topic.. So not a novelist in a magazine, which worships the rich class. Tge guardian. You misrepresent what they said. They talked about the Initial invasion force. Stop changing the facts
    1
  29.  @joelfisk  yeah nobody suspected they would run out of tanks.
    1
  30. Nobody said this. We only see they have extreme high losses
    1
  31. Tanks are much harder to produce so yes they could run out
    1
  32. How many do they build per mounth.
    1
  33. Kiddo. You didnt even whatched the video
    1
  34. Nope
    1
  35. Watch the video
    1
  36. Not quiet. They lost more than that. Also they have to loot tanks for spare parts
    1
  37. Article.....
    1
  38.  @jimallison2827  greedings. But there is something else. Russian troops are known for having poor Training and low vallue of life. So they might just throuw them into battle after basic training
    1
  39.  @jimallison2827  i was in the german army for 5 years we where considert as action ready after 1 and a half years. Earliest moment
    1
  40. Also your numbers only mean production numbers. Gues what over half of those tanks are sold to other countries, pulled out of Service or are just to old
    1
  41. There are already two of them
    1
  42. There is one. Name how many tanks does russia have left
    1
  43. There are two Update s
    1
  44.  @strawwalker8177  So that is it. That is you proof. The messed up recruitment in the Army.
    1
  45.  @strawwalker8177  i gues you have no proof what so ever. So dont start
    1
  46. Wow. That woild mean less than france 🤣. Dont go to far kid.
    1
  47. By gaining 150 sqkm within a year and loosing around 100.000 troops in the process? Not quiet winning.
    1
  48. Nope F35 can fly in bad weather, has been deployed thousands of times and is produced by the hundreds for dozens of nations. Nobody wants to buy SU57 and they produced not even a dozen of them
    1
  49. No they didnt. For several reasons. There is no evidence of that whatsoever. They would not needed them, cause they had totall airsupiriority in syria.
    1
  50. SEAD missions
    1