Comments by "s H" (@sH-ed5yf) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

  1. A limbing grany can intercept a 200kmh porche.
    1
  2. Are they? How much of ukraine did they took in one year. Finally 1 percent?
    1
  3. Quote. An army marxhes on its stomach. Greatly seen when they run out of fuel and had to loot for food in stores
    1
  4. Cause they still cant penetrate ukrainian airspace.
    1
  5.  @noballsbigshaft4486  Nothing realy has changed but if you throw tanks and man into the meatgrinder without respect of human life, the best fortress can slowly breake. The russians three insane amounts of stuff into Bullterrier and we saw hundreds if tanks and IFVs destroyed. But ukraine has only so much wapons. Its realy a irony. Populations like russians, whos state cares the least for them, are apperently most accepting of dying for their dictator. Same with russians under stalin, hitler or Mao.
    1
  6.  @noballsbigshaft4486  that is just unter nonsense. Russia heavily shells adjicka since summer. The main force attacks adjivka since Mai with heavy units. Starting in Pisky. But we all know where this is comming from. Russia isnt even trying right. That is why they dont win
    1
  7.  @noballsbigshaft4486  and no its not. If you follow the frontline adjivka wistood russian attacks for two years now. The battle of adjivka is lasting 9 mounths now. That is longer than any siege in ww2. This is an embarresment for russia
    1
  8.  @noballsbigshaft4486  Translation. There is no prove of any action of the su57
    1
  9.  @noballsbigshaft4486  nd what do they say. Ukraine gets problems. Problems mean the russians have conquered another street in adjivka. Every week of this conflict is another embarressment for russia
    1
  10. Easy. F35 is much harder to maintain, requires much more facilities and trained personal. Also its much more eypansive then f16s
    1
  11. Still active
    1
  12. No kid. Just observation
    1
  13. And still standing
    1
  14. Its not. Not a single Nato soildier is fighting. Not a single Nato fighterjet is in combat.
    1
  15. What is false here
    1
  16. Why do you claim they lost it. 80% of ukraine is free and the front is more or less stabile for a year now
    1
  17. Kremlin troll
    1
  18. The US is not at war with russia. They dont send their airforce or missles into russia
    1
  19. What happened to the adjivka offensive. Flop
    1
  20.  @AniMageNeBy  the ukrainian electrical grad was not destroyed by glide bombs my boy. Neither Was it by jets. It was mostly destroyed by huge waves of iranian drones and low vost cruese missles. No matter how good you are eventually you run out of ammo or some get zhrough
    1
  21.  @AniMageNeBy  so yes russia established a strip of a few dozen km of kind of airsuperiority. Within ukraine however, russia has no airsuperiority
    1
  22.  @AniMageNeBy  you dont know anything, do you. Those FABs are launched from deep in russian territory. Out of reach of ukrainian air defences
    1
  23. Still active though
    1
  24.  @ritabratagoswami7724  no it has not. Such a shape would not make any airodynamic sense. But keep telling yourself that
    1
  25.  @ritabratagoswami7724  nope. The FAB 500 has rounded head. The internal warhead of the khinzal is angled. Sorry made. They indeed intercepted one
    1
  26. Actually they did. They provided pictures of the warhead
    1
  27. Verified? By who? The kremlin?
    1
  28. No they dont. And you have no evidence what so ever
    1
  29. Cause every week thousands of russians die
    1
  30. You mean the country where 1/4 of people dont have access to toilets?
    1
  31. Get your spelling right
    1
  32. Russia always starts propaganda canpain whenever they use new wapon Systems. After all they want to soll them abroud
    1
  33.  @UmbraHand  yes. That was the time before stealth. Now all major powers have stealth aircraft. If the SU57 is as nearly as good as russia claims, they should have used it by now
    1
  34.  @UmbraHand  russia needs airsuprimacy and the best way to achieve this is SEAD missions with stealth aircraft, cause cruise missles need a lot of time ro prepair. The comparrisson with the B-58 is complete trash, cause it never was Intendant to operate in highly Contests airspace. It is a slow Bomber. The su57 is supposed to be a stealth all around aircraft.
    1
  35. The b58 was not stealth
    1
  36. Amerika never used russian parts in their military aircrsft. They are Not even allowed to do this. Btw the F35 for the marine corps is a Version for vertical take off. Its in production for 15 years now Try better next time..
    1
  37. They didnt. They still strugle to gain ground against one country with 5 percent of Nato budget
    1
  38. They literly used every wapon system they have excpect su57 and t14. Both are only abailable in miniscule numbers
    1
  39. No they dont
    1
  40. Russia itself claims to only have 8 of them operational , my little troll
    1
  41. And you guys cant prove any of this
    1
  42. So they hope to defend against Nato with 6 planes. Completly untested aircraft
    1
  43. Russia usually propagandizes its next gen wapins when used.
    1
  44. And of course you have proof for any of this right
    1
  45. Easy, cause they cant afford to station them near the front. Russia launches FABs from multiple km behind the front and imidiatly turn back.
    1
  46. What is misinformation here
    1
  47.  @klardfarkus3891  oryx. A Organisation of volunteers collected footag of shot down aircraft as evidence. Just because you dont like it, doesnt mean its propaganda
    1
  48. Confirmed by footage, russia lost around 120 aircraft. Including helicopters
    1
  49. The houthi attacks on israel where all intercwptes.
    1
  50. The houthis simply lie. They attacked non israeli ships several times.
    1