Comments by "Stephen Jenkins" (@stephenjenkins7971) on "TLDR News EU" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7.  @dahlbelzalan5892  What borders have any Western nation violated? Are they ones internationally recognized, or ones which Russia had declared as theirs? Because if its the latter, then no Western nation is going to respect it if only as a sign of support of Ukraine. But even then, these "incursions" are nowhere near large enough to ever threaten Russian territory; it'd be literal suicide. Hell, even the US troops in the region barely number enough to hold the line if a Russian invasion occurred; so why are you acting like the Western powers are the aggressors when Russia has amassed around 100k troops? What kind of "invasion" from the West involves no amassing of Western troops? Troop numbers even lower than Russia's? Russia literally is bringing in the bigger army and the only one mobilizing its military near another country's border, and you act as if they're the ones being attacked? How? NATO taking in more members literally doesn't do anything to Russia but remove another possible country to fuck with. Unless most of NATO mobilizes its troops near Russia's borders, which it has NEVER done, there is literally no threat to Russia. Yet you act like the US is bringing in 20k troops in each NATO member and are trying to add such numbers everywhere for the perfect multi-route invasion. That is not only Kremlin propaganda, it's the most braindead version of it in existence. And Russians like you drink it up without a thought. Which is exactly why Russia needs more sanctions; people like you will support every Russian invasion into the West because you unironically believe you're being attacked. And nothing will convince you. So economic hardship to you and your family it is then until you back off.
    2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37.  @anastasiagileva8711  1) It isn't the US' job to "mention" anything about this, it ain't their country. You're not special. 2) By every metric he won, and your claims that the numbers are fake come right from your ass because nothing in existence points to the election being fake. If that was the case, then you could cite proof, but you can't. 3) It was a coup attempt by Communist hardliners to stop the election, it was from the top-bottom, not the bottom-up; the only riot from the people came in SUPPORT of Yeltsin against the Communist hardliners. "The GKChP relied on regional and local soviets, which were still mostly dominated by the Communist Party, to support the coup by forming emergency committees to repress dissidence." "The Soviet public was divided on the coup. A poll in the RSFSR by Mnenie on the morning of 19 April showed that 23.6 percent of Russians believed the GKChP could improve living standards, while 41.9 percent had no opinion. However separate polls by Interfax showed that many Russians, including 71 percent of residents of Leningrad, feared the return of mass repressions. The GKChP also enjoyed strong support in the Russian-majority regions of Estonia and Transnistria, while Yeltsin enjoyed strong support in Sverdlovsk and Nizhny Novgorod." The GKChP either got abysmally low support and/or Yeltsin got all of the support. Your propaganda lies may work in Russia without the ability to check them, but they don't work on anyone else with a functioning brain.
    2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2