Hearted Youtube comments on Dan Davis History (@DanDavisHistory) channel.
-
3600
-
3400
-
3100
-
3000
-
2900
-
2400
-
2400
-
2300
-
1700
-
1700
-
1700
-
1600
-
1400
-
1300
-
1100
-
1100
-
1000
-
948
-
879
-
877
-
865
-
858
-
851
-
827
-
810
-
787
-
777
-
758
-
724
-
722
-
711
-
701
-
691
-
684
-
684
-
681
-
680
-
677
-
669
-
664
-
661
-
652
-
649
-
649
-
I think it is a mistake, to assume that the bit is the only way to control a horse. Spanish riding traditional uses what is called a hackamore. A woven strip of rawhide encircles the horses muzzle. Pressure on the muzzle, controls the horse.
In modern times, the people of Mongolia ride horses very similar to ancient horses. Very short, and very stocky. The argument that short and stocky horses would not be an advantage, is somewhat ridiculous.
Training a wild horse, without the use of a previously trained horse, is nigh impossible. However, if a young foal were captured, after the killing of its mother, it would be quite easy to train that horse. Very much in the same way that wolf puppies we're probably trained, to be domestic companions.
I think that modern archaeologists have a tendency to belittle the abilities of ancient peoples. It is important to remember that they were every bit as smart as we are. To say that early peoples were not capable of doing what we do all the time, shows a tremendous amount of hubris. If they were eating horses, they had access to foals. If they had access to foals, then they had access to rideable mounts.
Personally, I believe that domestication occurred very early. However, archaeological proof of such domestication would be unlikely to survive. This is why we have not found walrus skin boots, from ancient times. But that's another topic, entirely.
Enjoyed the video. Keep it up
633
-
579
-
573
-
536
-
531
-
530