Hearted Youtube comments on Andrew Lam (@Lam) channel.

  1. 84
  2. 78
  3. 78
  4. 77
  5. 77
  6. 74
  7. 74
  8. 72
  9. 71
  10. 70
  11. 70
  12. 68
  13.  @SadisticSenpai61  You are mostly correct as far as I know and hopefully soon you will be far less correct. The UK government, through a number of bodies, is reviewing building safety regulations right now, this includes Approved Document B, BS9991 and BS9999, with particular focus on tall residential buildings, and will be publishing more information over the next couple of years and the information coming out already is being reviewed by industry experts. Parallel to this, building fire safety is under review by major architectural/multidisciplinary studios and fire engineers. The new gateways for planning approval are already raising the standard of fire safety design and we will see the results of that in new builds as designers are now being held to a higher standard that the current standards and regulations, which is a little confusing for all, but will work itself out. The push for the ability for disabled residents to easily be able to evacuate a building without assistance is also making a difference, in particular with the New London Plan in regard to evacuation and fire lifts, although these high standards are also being applied to other projects in the UK. And on top of that there is the new standards coming out for the recording of fire safety information following the Golden Thread and including that in digital construction information, digital construction/BIM models coming from fire engineers, and the new addition of FIREie coming soon, which is similar to COBie BIM information, but for fire risk management. I could go on, but my comment is getting pretty long already. TLDR: Stuff is happening and the standard for fire safety is being improved in the UK in every way that the industry can think of.
    68
  14. 66
  15. 64
  16. 63
  17. 61
  18. 60
  19. 60
  20. 59
  21. 59
  22. 58
  23. 57
  24. 55
  25. A good video but I don't think you mentioned how the rubber itself has changed and improved over the years too(?) For example, all-season tires weren't a thing several years ago but now with improved rubber technology/compounds you have tires that can perform well all year round in summer and winter conditions. Like dedicated winter tires, all-season tires are certified for winter use by the mountain snowflake symbol on the tire sidewall.   Where I'm from with milder winters I think all-season tires are a good choice, and I have them on all my cars. In cold and wintry conditions the handling and safety is improved when compared to using summer tires all year round (which most drivers in my country still do). Obviously for places with harsher, longer winters you will get better performance by swapping between two sets of tires (summer and winter tires). Also maybe if you drive a sports car, and want optimal performance, then you would probably want to swap tires according to the conditions too. And I totally agree tires should be tested over an extended period of time, and not just when they are brand new and supple. I remember suggesting this on one of the popular youtube tire review channels a while back. Most of us will use a set of tires on our cars for a few years. Over that time not only does the tire pattern change but with weathering, sun light etc the characteristics of the rubber itself changes (often hardening) which affects the performance of the tire too, especially in cold conditions.
    54
  26. 50
  27. 50
  28. 47
  29. 47
  30. 46
  31. 44
  32. 42
  33. 41
  34. 36
  35. 35
  36. 35
  37. 35
  38. 34
  39. 33
  40. 33
  41. 30
  42. 29
  43. 28
  44. 27
  45. 27
  46. 27
  47. 26
  48. 25
  49. 25
  50. 25