Hearted Youtube comments on Éireann (@diaryofeireann) channel.
-
1600
-
1000
-
1000
-
988
-
900
-
832
-
769
-
608
-
606
-
590
-
I'm a cancer researcher, and let me tell you, your case is every laboratory personnel's worst nightmare. We want to give you the correct diagnosis as soon as possible, but that also means we will not give you half/potentially wrong diagnoses... and as for the timing, usually labs prefer to run tests sequentially instead of concurrently, due to the pricing. So we start with the easy, cheap tests that find most of the diagnoses, and then move on to harder and more expensive methods until we find an answer. The test I am most familiar with takes anywhere between 24-48 hours to run and then another 12 hours to properly analyze the data. So in a bad scenario, lets say the test is set up on a thursday, it could be the monday that the data is analyzed.... and if the answer does not come from that test, we have to run another one. This is not to make you feel less bad about the time it is taking (because I fully agree, this is taking long) but just to help you understand what is going on behind the scenes. I imagine the scientist assigned your case is having sleepless nights over it. And for the question why not put your most advanced test first? Well..... so the test I mentioned previously is somewhere in the middle of extreme testing and can cost 10 grand per test.... 😬 hospitals and labs make choices based on their resources (which is probably also why it was send to London, they have more resources) and then you end up with scenarios like this. The doctor not understanding the report is also not surprising to me, they are experienced in entirely different lingo than the molecular jargon. Keep on fighting! I assure you the scientists and doctors will too ❤
524
-
493
-
462
-
438
-
383
-
372
-
367
-
329
-
328
-
242
-
233
-
186
-
172
-
165
-
145
-
143
-
138
-
137
-
136
-
134
-
133
-
120
-
118
-
118
-
118
-
115
-
114
-
113
-
111
-
108
-
105
-
104
-
102
-
101
-
97
-
95
-
95
-
90
-
88
-
87