Hearted Youtube comments on Engineering Explained (@EngineeringExplained) channel.

  1. 244
  2. I appreciate a lot your work: it's great, keep going! Unfortunately I have to say something about the topic of this video: First of all It's true that Diesel engines have higher compression ratios resulting in higher Peak firing Pressures and consequently higher values of torque BUT this is not the "true reason" why CI engines have more torque COMPARED to SI ones. In fact, while the SI engine works always stoichiometric (or even slightly in the rich side (relative A/R (Air Fuel ratio) ~0.9)), the Diesel engine cannot work anywhere close to the stoichiometric A/R due to t bad air utilization (min relative A/R is in the order of 1.2-1.3) thus resulting in ~20% less fuel injected (in mass) for the same quantity of air in the cylinder. Lower fuel injected means lower energy released in the combustion and so lower torque (this "base" 20% deficit is partially, but non totally, compensated by the higher compression ratio and higher Diesel specific energy). If you compare the torque figures of old naturally aspirated diesels with NA SI engines of the same time you'll verify what I'm saying. The second thing you mentioned is not wrong but it's not that relevant: the combustion of a Diesel engine is more efficient when it tends to a constant-volume combustion (like in the case of the IDEAL Otto cycle). For partial loads, the actual duration of the two combustion processes, even if they're fundamentally different, is comparable and I would say that there are so many variables involved (speed, temperature, fuel quality, turbulence in the clinder, etc) that is difficult to say which combustion process is the most efficient. However, at high loads, the combustion process of a SI engine is definetly occurring faster than a CI one since the latter has to fight against a "mixing controlled combustion" during which fuels struggles to find air to react with. (In fact, CI engines rotate slower than SI ones) For what concerns the third point you presented... it's just a false myth: the higher lever of a longer stroke is counteracted by the lower force resulting from a smaller bore. If you take the condensed formula to compute engine power you'll notice that bore and stroke are multyplied together giving as a result the displacement (longer stroke -> smaller bore). So, the reason why diesel engines have much higher specific torque than SI ones is turbocharging. Thanks to the very high allowed boost ratio it is possible to force a lot of air inside the cylinder and so it is possible to burn more diesel than gasoline (for a given displacement). This results in a much higher torque together with a more efficient engine. (Power output, unfortunately, si affected by the "slow" combustion process that doesn't allow the engine to rotate as fast as a SI engines). This comment doesn't want to be against you. You've always done a great job. It's just to make things a little bit clearer.
    244
  3. 243
  4. 243
  5. 242
  6. 242
  7. 242
  8. 241
  9. 241
  10. 240
  11. 240
  12. 238
  13. 237
  14. 237
  15. 236
  16. 236
  17. 236
  18. 236
  19. 236
  20. 236
  21. 235
  22. 235
  23. 234
  24. 234
  25. 234
  26. 233
  27. 233
  28. 233
  29. 232
  30. 232
  31. 232
  32. 231
  33. 231
  34. 231
  35. 231
  36. 231
  37. 230
  38. 230
  39. 230
  40. 230
  41. 230
  42. 229
  43. 229
  44. 229
  45. 228
  46. 228
  47. 228
  48. 227
  49. 226
  50. 226