Comments by "Goose" (@goose7574) on "COURT TV"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@evangeline77x
The problem with what happened here though, is that it was one person who evaluated her, not multiple ones over a period of time like you say.
I feel that she needs to be evaluated like you say, at least twice, unless the second one says the same thing.
I've spoken with both a Psychologist and Psychiatrist, and also a psychiatric nurse practitioner about this, to get three different perspectives. They said it's definitely possible for somebody who's an extreme Narcissist and likely a Sociopath or Psychopath (but not the actual terminology they use now), to even fool a professional. And when it's done more than once and notes can actually be compared (because many times, answers will change when somebody is lying or "trying to fool somebody"), that's the best way to do things.
Just like with regular M.D.'s, it's important to get AT LEAST a second opinion, if not a third, depending on the circumstances.
In the documents, it talks about how the courts appointed one person to do an evaluation, but not multiple doctors.
I'm sure that the Prosecution will ask to do their own evaluation with a court appointed Psychologist as well, so that there isn't just one evaluation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@linanicolia1363
I agree with you.
It's so hard to say. It would be interesting to know if the roomie told her/his own friends about his/her roommates missing.
I think back to when I was younger and what I would've done.
#1. I think it's odd that they supposedly didn't know their last names. Do you think that's odd? If I'm going to rent to/from a stranger, I'm going to know their full name (and likely their birthdate as well- since things are crazy nowadays. I likely would do a background check if it's a straight up stranger, and not an acquaintance of a friend).
#2. Did the roommate talk to any of their own friends or family members about this? Usually of you're that concerned about someone, you're going to tell somebody- friends, family, co-workers, etc.
#3. Supposedly there was at least one pet. What kind of pet is this? Is it something that needs to go out or be fed regularly? Like a dog? Or is it something like a cat, that has a litter box (and maybe a self feeding food dish). Or is it something like a bird/guinea pig/etc., that doesn't need much for a few days.
There are so many questions.
You would think that they would've told somebody, unless (like you said), there's more to the story.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sarah5893
Agreed they should have...
The fact is, many states DON'T have the policy to wait 72 hours. In fact, more often than not, most don't even have an actual policy, because they've gotten in to trouble (sued) in the past, because of it. Michigan is a state that says they "may" wait up to 72, but they still want to know whenever you think somebody is missing. My Sweetie is a Sergeant for the local PD (and has been in L.E. for over 25 years), so I decided to ask him about this, and he said that a lot of people have mixed thoughts on this. He said that anytime someone is thought to be missing, no matter the time (within reason- unless it's a child, elderly, or someone who's handicapped, or there's a reason to believe foul play is involved), someone should call. The Department will talk with the person, take information and/or explain protocol. They'd much rather get a call earlier than not, because time really is it the essence.
Unfortunately with this case, their car was found, with two deceased, decaying bodies, that are more at the coroner's officer being identified.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1