Comments by "Z P" (@zachman5150) on "Jubilee"
channel.
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@Birdiee93x Well, being that r@pe and incest only account for 1% of cases, some perspective is required to address the talking point.
On that issue, I would point out that terminating that pregnancy doesn't undo the trauma caused by an attacker.
I would also point out that terminating the life of an innocent child doesn't put aside a woman's trauma; It adds to it, an additional victim and the additional potential trauma of the ab0rti0n, experienced by women in significant numbers.
Also, the value of the innocent resulting child in the womb, isn't diminished because one or both of their parents were bad.
I'm under no delusion that there is a potential for a meeting of the minds, when it comes to philosophical issues about morality, such as issues like these-- which separate those who value life as something bigger than just an opportunity for self-gratification-- from those, who just don't.
Women are not forced to have unprotected sex, so if you want to chase pleasure, you have to bear responsibility for the possible outcomes. No innocent life should face termination because of the lack of responsibility among adults.
The 'Pro'-choice you're in favor of maintaining-- is the ability to terminate the child in the womb, in the name of convenience and it's shameful.
The morals and ethics of those who would declare the unborn to be disposable-- in the name of convenience, are questionable-- at Best, and are those of narcissists and sociopaths.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5