Comments by "Z P" (@zachman5150) on "Leeja Miller"
channel.
-
2
-
@TransHippie How do you figure trans women are women, being that all women are human females, who've reached the age of adulthood, not some subjective social construct, identity, feeling, fetish, preference, or costume?
You seem quite unclear on the definition of 'woman', and the scientific classification of human development that is unique to the female half of the binary sexual dichotomy of male and female for all mammals.
The justification for separating men and women in prison, showers, locker rooms, changing rooms, the draft, and sports teams/leagues seems to only be confusing to you. Whats your issue with women having a right to privacy??? Well.... ???
Justify and explain how eliminating women's private spaces and allowing men to encroach isn't misogyny on your part? Anything???
Why should everyone pretend that a man is anything other than a man, regardless of his attire, or feelings to the contrary?
2
-
@markus10X How do you figure trans women are women, being that all women are human females, who've reached the age of adulthood, not some subjective social construct, identity, feeling, fetish, preference, or costume?
You seem quite unclear on the definition of 'woman', and the scientific classification of human development that is unique to the female half of the binary sexual dichotomy of male and female for all mammals.
The justification for separating men and women in prison, showers, locker rooms, changing rooms, the draft, and sports teams/leagues seems to only be confusing to you. Whats your issue with women having a right to privacy??? Well.... ???
Justify and explain how eliminating women's private spaces and allowing men to encroach isn't misogyny on your part? Anything???
Why should everyone pretend that a man is anything other than a man, regardless of his attire, or feelings to the contrary? 🦗🦗🦗
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Believing there is some "essence" specific to males or female as far as feelings go, that can manifest "in the wrong body", is akin to a religious belief, having faith in something that is impossible to prove or disprove. The thing is though, that no one on the "trans" side can actually even explain what this "essence" is, they can't even explain it to themselves yet have convinced themselves that the feeling they have means they "are in the wrong body" - without realizing that their discomfort simply stems from not realizing that they view conforming to sexist stereotypes as legitimate measures of manhood or womanhood.
That is why every explanation given of WHY a male "can't be a man, but is instead woman" etc. relies upon listing stereotypical stuff, or, in some cases is completely abstract and refuses to actually provide any explanation of what they mean, simply stating they "know" that what they feel means what they say it does, even though they can't actually provide a definition of it. "It's hard to explain but I know I'm right" is an attitude one constantly comes up against - a religious faith in something they can't define.
This idea that the terms "man" and "woman" carry all this baggage, sexist stereotypes, that people need to live up to or feel comfortable with is a complete fabrication coming from the "trans" side. You lot want a term to reflect aspects of your personality as well, you want to create more boxes to put people in, as you won't accept simply just being a man or a woman based on being born male or female (and reaching adulthood, obviously people are boys and girls before becoming men or women), but believe you need this "freedom of expression" to broadcast what sexist stereotypes you feel more comfortable with - thinking the world needs to adopt the sexist view you lot have (you fail to see just how much you have in common with Conservatives).
Replacing objective definitions which are based in physical reality, with entirely subjective metaphysical claims, is not logical in any way, is not morally superior, and is demonstrably harmful, not least to female rights and protections, but also to practically anyone that buys into it as it warps people's perception of the underlying issues. It hinders people in their quest for individuation, creating this false narrative of them becoming more "authentic" when the total opposite is true, they believe they need validation from others in order to be happy etc. instead of being encouraged to find more inner strength and resilience with less reliance on how people see them. Demanding to be legally recognized as the opposite sex of what one is, is in no way shape or form more authentic than accepting the physical reality one is born into.
To believe we as individuals can have 100% control over our identity in society, what we are seen as by others, in interaction with, and in relation to, society/the world/physical existence is a fool's errand, it is a delusional understanding of reality and existence.
A dude in a dress, who's chosen to surgically alter his anatomy, is still a dude-- He's just a dude who's chosen to remove himself from the gene pool, and have properly functioning organs rendered no longer functioning.
They're only kidding themselves when they don't acknowledge that the trans activist narratives include the notion that a trans woman is a woman, is objectively just false/wrong.
The problem with the trans activist's narratives are that life is based in objective reality, and the vast majority of people don't have difficulty deciphering the differences between reality and the trans imagination, and they aren't willing to participate in the LARP and cosplay, as though it's based in reality
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dariocarraresi1823 I did. If you didn't comprehend the answer, that's a You problem.
It's the trans community which proclaims it's desire to integrate into society, and to achieve affirmation, validation, and acceptance.
Your interactions, snarky and obnoxious as they are, fail to motivate the very people with whom the trans community says it wishes to integrate, and they certainly fail to persuade.
Congratulations!!! You played yourself
You're triggered and seeking attention because you Don't care about what I think right? Uh huh-- Get a friend
If as you believe, gender and sex are truly independent, why are trans people subscribing to a sexual stereotypical caricature of biological sex as their blueprint for how they present themselves???
No, sorry not sorry. The cult narratives are incoherent madness.
The main problem that the trans activist ideological narratives have is that life is based in objective reality and most don't have difficulty deciphering the difference between reality and the trans imagination.
You're only fooling yourself, if you don't acknowledge the trans activists saying trans women are women. They're dudes with issues, prancing around as though they're women without issues-- Still men.
ALL women are born female, all men are born male and neither are a social construct, feeling, fetish, preference or costume. A dude with a psych issue who believes he's a woman, is still a dude.
That just how it is. Seethe if you must, then just cope harder... You're only fooling yourselves and you aren't persuading me, so you ought to move on
2
-
@peomaster6914 LOL... Wrong. Gender: The status of being either male or female. The entire purpose of the gender/sex division in most species of animal life is to facilitate procreation, the sexual identity of an individual is best classified according to the gametes produced by the person in question. There is no extant third gamete.
An extremely minute percentage of humans are either “intersex” (typically referring to those who are anatomical hermaphrodites) or of indeterminate gender (that is, not easily determined by a cursory inspection of the external genitalia), but that does not negate the incontrovertible scientific fact that there are only two genders.
As far as we know, there has never existed a single human being with the ability to BOTH conceive a child in his/her womb and, simultaneously, successfully inseminate a woman (or in more disturbing terms, for a hermaphrodite to inseminate him/herself). And even if such an individual has existed, that person would be a combination of BOTH male and female, and not some imaginary, novel third gender.
Cf. “sex”. Both terms (“gender” and “sex”) originate from Latin words: “genus” (meaning “begin”; “birth”; “kind”; “race”; “gender”) and “sexus” (meaning “sex”; “division”; “gender”).
So, essentially, the only significant distinction between the two terms is that the etymology of “gender” pertains to the beginning of things, as can be plainly seen by the other English words that originate from "genus", such as “generic”, “genetic”, and “generate”, whilst “sex” is a scrupulously-literal translation of the Latin cognate “sexus”.
The mere fact that the word “genitals” (referring to reproductive organs) is very closely related to the Latin “genus” is further evidence of the assertion that the term “gender” refers to the binary division of human (and of course, many non-human) sexual identity, and NOT to any taxonomy based on emotion, feelings, psychology, or any other non-biological categorization schema. ;)
Way too many inappropriately and incorrectly conflate gender/sex (There are only 2-- male/female... That's it) with personality traits and temperament (There are a ton and none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys), and again with gender roles (without exception refer to the roles of males and females in society) as though they're synonymous and they are not.
Science has already proven that the binary dichotomy of all mammals is male/female.
A man in a dress is still a man
A man with anxiety about his sex/gender-- still a man
A man calling himself a woman-- still a man
A man with an effeminate personality--still a man
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TransHippie Ahh, you're going to pretend I didn't cover this for you already... Okay, Gender is established at conception, and observed at birth or before. No, gender is not an internal experience. Masculinity/femininity/body language (Personality and Temperament), Fashion, voice (Neither are gender exclusive).
Neither your demeanor, nor your internal feelings are what define your gender nor do they make you a woman or a man-- it's your biology
Gender: The status of being either male or female. The entire purpose of the gender/sex division in most species of animal life is to facilitate procreation, the sexual identity of an individual is best classified according to the gametes produced by the person in question. There is no extant third gamete.
An extremely minute percentage of humans are either “intersex” (typically referring to those who are anatomical hermaphrodites) or of indeterminate gender (that is, not easily determined by a cursory inspection of the external genitalia), but that does not negate the incontrovertible scientific fact that there are only two genders.
As far as we know, there has never existed a single human being with the ability to BOTH conceive a child in his/her womb and, simultaneously, successfully inseminate a woman (or in more disturbing terms, for a hermaphrodite to inseminate him/herself). And even if such an individual has existed, that person would be a combination of BOTH male and female, and not some imaginary, novel third gender.
Cf. “sex”. Both terms (“gender” and “sex”) originate from Latin words: “genus” (meaning “begin”; “birth”; “kind”; “race”; “gender”) and “sexus” (meaning “sex”; “division”; “gender”).
So, essentially, the only significant distinction between the two terms is that the etymology of “gender” pertains to the beginning of things, as can be plainly seen by the other English words that originate from "genus", such as “generic”, “genetic”, and “generate”, whilst “sex” is a scrupulously-literal translation of the Latin cognate “sexus”.
The mere fact that the word “genitals” (referring to reproductive organs) is very closely related to the Latin “genus” is further evidence of the assertion that the term “gender” refers to the binary division of human (and of course, many non-human) sexual identity, and NOT to any taxonomy based on emotion, feelings, psychology, or any other non-biological categorization schema. ;)
Way too many inappropriately and incorrectly conflate gender/sex (There are only 2-- male/female... That's it) with personality traits and temperament (There are a ton and none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys), and again with gender roles (without exception refer to the roles of males and females in society) as though they're synonymous and they are not.
Science has already proven that the binary dichotomy of all mammals is male/female.
A man in a dress is still a man
A man with anxiety about his sex/gender- due to GD- still a man
A man calling himself a woman-- still a man
A man with an effeminate personality--still a man
You/They haven't put forth any reasoning that withstands scrutiny, rendering your/their narratives and opinions as less than useless and therefore invalid.
Reality isn't an anti-trans ideology. Trans is an anti-reality ideology, and they're the ones seeking affirmation, validation, and the participation of everyone in their larp and cosplay, based on the belief that their subjective delusions are based in reality. Newsflash: They aren't
2
-
2
-
@literallyinflames This idea that the terms "man" and "woman" are referring to subjective gender identity claims is demonstrably false dude, and carries all this baggage, sexist stereotypes, that people need to live up to or feel comfortable with is a complete fabrication coming from the "trans" side.
Pro trans activists seem to want a term to reflect aspects of their personality-- as well.
They want to create more boxes to put people in, as they won't accept simply just being a man or a woman based on being born male or female (and reaching adulthood, obviously people are boys and girls before becoming men or women), but believe they need this "freedom of expression", to broadcast what the sexist stereotypes they feel more comfortable with - thinking the world needs to adopt the sexist view they have.
Replacing objective definitions, which are based in physical reality, with entirely subjective metaphysical claims, is not logical in any way, is not morally superior, and is demonstrably harmful, not least to female rights and protections, but also to practically anyone that buys into it as it warps people's perception of the underlying issues.
It hinders people in their quest for individuation, creating this false narrative of them becoming more "authentic" when the total opposite is true, they believe they need validation from others in order to be happy etc. instead of being encouraged to find more inner strength and resilience with less reliance on how people see them.
Demanding to be legally recognized as the opposite sex of what one is, is in no way shape or form more "authentic" than accepting the physical reality one is born into.
To believe we as individuals can have 100% control over our identity or self-perceptions in society, how and what we are seen as by others, in interaction with, and in relation to, society/the world/physical existence is a fool's errand, it is a delusional understanding of reality and existence.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2