Comments by "Z P" (@zachman5150) on "Leeja Miller"
channel.
-
@TransHippie — The vast majority, 85%, were convicted of violent crimes that caused death “or serious harm” to their victims (58% of whom were children or women). Whether they went further down the lunatic trail and transitioned doesn't make your case that trans people are justified to be treated as though they're the sex they identify as, disconnected with objective reality, and it doesn't define what transitioned means (Full top and bottom surgery, or just feeling like identifying like a fairy princess in the moment is unclear)
I would argue that the 94% stat is inaccurate, as humans are ALWAYS their biological sex 100% of the time, and the term transitioned doesn't change that. Clearly, since 64% of these offenders had committed a “CURRENT sexual offense,”-- they didn't have bottom surgery. They're dudes with psych issues alright.
You've destroyed your own integrity and credibility by acting like a petulant brat, and failing to engage with questions which expose your narratives as nothing but incoherent unjustifiable nonsense.
Rejected as invalid, and unacceptable. Women have rights
2
-
2
-
@TransHippie About that... I know, the truth of reality crushes your radical activist gender ideological narratives, and it triggers your TDS (trump Derangement Syndrome), making you lose your intellectual faculties even further far gone than they already are. ❄🤡
The Special Olympics exists for a reason. Perhaps that's your solution. 🤔Make a trans division in the Special Olympics, and your problem's solved, on the sports front.
Regarding assimilating into the society you find yourself choosing to reside in, just remember it's not on them to deny or change their culture, social norms, traditions, or laws for your validation, because you think you're entitled to their submission, acceptance, affirmation and validation.
Newsflash: You're Not
Not all cultures are equal, compatible, nor desirable... That's why sovereign nation have borders
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dariocarraresi1823 You have preexisting unanswered questions, which I've posed to you which you've in a cowardly fashion, avoided answering like the plague, because they expose the absurdity of your ideological narratives and bad faith interactions, and in no way provide you any moral ground to stand on and complain when you get what you give.
The problem you have with your virtue signaling, is the total absence of any actual virtue in any of your unproven, unhinged rants or whinging.
How do you figure trans women are women, being that all women are human females, who've reached the age of adulthood, not some subjective social construct, identity, feeling, fetish, preference, or costume?
You seem quite unclear on the definition of 'woman', and the scientific classification of human development that is unique to the female half of the binary sexual dichotomy of male and female for all mammals.
The justification for separating men and women in prison, showers, locker rooms, changing rooms, the draft, and sports teams/leagues seems to only be confusing to you. Whats your issue with women having a right to privacy??? Well.... ???
Justify and explain how eliminating women's private spaces and allowing men to encroach isn't misogyny on your part? Anything???
Why should everyone pretend that a man is anything other than a man, regardless of his attire, or feelings to the contrary? Well?? ANYTHING to justify it?
What DO they do, to justify being treated as though they're entitled to infiltrate areas segregated by sex? Answer: Not a thing
Seethe if you must, then remember-- I don't care about your incoherent and inane sophistry or opinions. I've rejected the notion that men should ever be treated as though they're women. Rationalize it in whatever way you like. I don't care. You fail to persuade, or justify why they ought to be.
Well??? Make your case a good one, or the expectation that you ought to be taken seriously and consider your arguments valid just don't exist. Ready? GO!!!
2
-
@dariocarraresi1823 "How do you figure trans women are women..." - Their gender identity. Women aren't a social construct. That's not an answer
"You seem quite unclear on the definition of 'woman', and the scientific classification..." - Words can have more than just one definition. --In this case there isn't. All women are born female.
"The justification for separating men and women in prison..." - Most of your justifications are bull and should be eliminated. For example, pro-trans policies decrease the rates of physical/sexual assaults; anti-trans policies increase them. That's a good reason to allow trans women in women's prisons. I asked you for evidence re: that BS claim of yours, and you ran like a coward, providing none. Got anything yet? (Pro trans policies are to blame for female inmates being assaulted and impregnated). Couldn't have happened otherwise. Good thinking 😵😵💫🤕🤒🙄
"Whats your issue with women having a right to privacy?" - "Right to privacy" doesn't extend to "kicking out people you don't like from public spaces, or from spaces that are privately owned by other people". YES, it does, when they're in places they're not authorized to be
"Justify and explain how eliminating women's private spaces..." - Strawman. Nobody is trying to eliminate women's private spaces. You just did with your previous comment re: prisons. You're FOS
"Why should everyone pretend that a man is..." - Nobody is asking you to pretend that people with XY chromosomes have XX chromosomes. Another strawman. You use it as an excuse to infiltrate women's only spaces, so AGAIN, you're FOS
"What DO they do, to justify being treated as though they're entitled to infiltrate areas segregated by sex?" - Your sex segregation is bull, and is not a valid argument for anything.
You've failed to prove anything you've written. Got anything yet?
2
-
@TransHippie Fun Facts: Words have meanings and for all of history, the words man and woman have referred to biological human beings. All women are human, and born female and represent 1 half of the binary sexual dichotomy of all mammalian species, the other being male.
Believing there is some "essence" specific to males or female as far as feelings go, that can manifest "in the wrong body", is akin to a religious belief, having faith in something that is impossible to prove or disprove.
The thing is though, that no one on the "trans" side can actually even explain what this "essence" is, they can't even explain it to themselves yet have convinced themselves that the feeling they have means they "are in the wrong body" - without realizing that their discomfort simply stems from not realizing that they view conforming to sexist stereotypes as legitimate measures of manhood or womanhood.
That is why every explanation given of WHY a male "can't be a man, but is instead woman" etc. relies upon listing stereotypical stuff, or, in some cases is completely abstract and refuses to actually provide any explanation of what they mean, simply stating they "know" that what they feel means what they say it does, even though they can't actually provide a definition of it. "It's hard to explain but I know I'm right" is an attitude one constantly comes up against - a religious faith in something they can't define.
This idea that the terms "man" and "woman" carry all this baggage, sexist stereotypes, that people need to live up to or feel comfortable with is a complete fabrication coming from the "trans" side.
You lot want a term to reflect aspects of your personality as well, you want to create more boxes to put people in, as you won't accept simply just being a man or a woman based on being born male or female (and reaching adulthood, obviously people are boys and girls before becoming men or women), but believe you need this "freedom of expression" to broadcast what sexist stereotypes you feel more comfortable with - thinking the world needs to adopt the sexist view you lot have (you fail to see just how much you have in common with Conservatives).
Replacing objective definitions which are based in physical reality, with entirely subjective metaphysical claims, is not logical in any way, is not morally superior, and is demonstrably harmful, not least to female rights and protections, but also to practically anyone that buys into it as it warps people's perception of the underlying issues.
It hinders people in their quest for individuation, creating this false narrative of them becoming more "authentic" when the total opposite is true, they believe they need validation from others in order to be happy etc. instead of being encouraged to find more inner strength and resilience with less reliance on how people see them. Demanding to be legally recognized as the opposite sex of what one is, is in no way shape or form more authentic than accepting the physical reality one is born into.
To believe we as individuals can have 100% control over our identity in society, what we are seen as by others, in interaction with, and in relation to, society/the world/physical existence is a fool's errand, it is a delusional understanding of reality and existence.
Now you know better
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TransHippie No, however-- I do have contempt for liars, and intellectually vacant ideological cult claims, which I see as nothing more than propaganda that can't be justified when scrutinized (That includes those horrible uncontrolled survey's you refer to, which don't rise to the level of actual science, but more closely resembles science-fiction and pseudo-science), and NONE of the trans advocates accepting your claims as accurate, seem to be capable or willing to address the peer reviewed medical studies I referred to, which challenge your survey's conclusions and claims.
You have failed to make your case stand up to scrutiny, and say I'm irrational, despite numerous posts making my case by citing my reasoning, and debunking your claims in the process.
You advocate adult entertainment as appropriate for children.
You advocate encroaching on women's privacy rights-- and call my lifestyle choice vile and question my morality. People like you, who live in glass snow globes, shouldn't throw stones.
Here's the thing-- I'm neither seeking your affirmation, nor acceptance to establish validation for who I am, and neither is the rest of the majority of the world. THAT would be YOU, doing that and getting triggered whenever someone identifies as someone who doesn't have to participate in your cosplay and LARP, as though it's based in reality.
I'm not judging you. I am however, discerning and challenging the validity of your claims, and no one on the pro trans activist side (including you) seems able to handle discussing it openly or with integrity.
Your entire world view is based in moral relativism, so I really don't care about your thoughts about my morality either, as you have nothing justifying your positions on morality as being valid.
I comment here, to see if I can find any signs of integrity among those of you who subscribe to and advocate your cult claims, to answer my challenges, or questions and so far-- NOPE, not one.
2
-
All women are born female, and as it has been pointed out-- the trans activists insist that gender identity and sex are separate, so can anyone justify encroaching on things separated based on sex, as an entitlement, or reason why things segregated based on sex like showers, locker rooms, sports, sports teams and prisons should not be segregated based on sex?
While we're at it, is ANYONE able to justify the expectation that just because someone presents and identifies in a non-traditional fashion, that all of society must then agree to and be obligated to treat them as though they're the opposite sex?
Looking forward to seeing if anyone can justify why those expectations should be taken seriously, by anyone
2
-
@phaneros8180 Not an answer for Why should a subjective, unverifiable gender identity matter at all, in areas designated by biological sex?
Recognizing people for what they are isn't an attack. Demanding to be legally recognized as the opposite sex of what one is, is in no way, shape, or form existing as themselves, or somehow more authentic than accepting the physical reality one is born into.
Replacing objective definitions which are based in physical reality, with entirely subjective metaphysical claims, is not logical in any way, is not morally superior, and is demonstrably harmful, not least to female rights and protections, but also to practically anyone that buys into it as it warps people's perception of the underlying issues.
It hinders people in their quest for individuation, creating this false narrative of them becoming more "authentic" when the total opposite is true, they believe they need validation from others in order to be happy etc. instead of being encouraged to find more inner strength and resilience with less reliance on how people see them.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dariocarraresi1823 Well, but how are they supposedly mixing up 'gender identity', 'gender roles', 'biological sex', and 'masculine/feminine' behavior?
The 1st thing I would point out is, it's grammatically incorrect/absurd, to use 'they' and 'them' when referring to an individual, as 'they' and 'them' are plural, not singular.
Also, you wouldn't use pronouns when speaking to someone in the 1st person, you'd use their names.
Also, you can't change your sex/gender. That's established at conception
I don't get it...
2
-
@dariocarraresi1823 No, but what are they mixing up 'gender identity' with? Please define 'Gender identity'
Gender and Sex are from the Latin and are defined, and refer to biology, and one of the synonyms for sex is gender.
What are they mixing up 'Gender Roles' with? Please, define 'Gender Roles'
Gender Roles are social constructs which refer to the roles of males and females in society
What are they mixing up 'Biological Sex' with? All men are born male, all women are born female and regardless of their wardrobe, tendencies, preferences, personalities, or belief systems-- That state is fixed and permanent.
Why would anyone think they would have a say about the language others choose to use, while not in their presence. ex. If they think you're a jerk, are you saying they (even in a private conversation, and not in your presence) shouldn't be allowed to say so, too?
You think they believe using plural pronouns for single individuals, is going to induce a mental disorder causing a desire to mutilate their bodies their biology? Why do you believe they think that? If it did motivate that, seems like there are some massive psych issues going on in the 1st place, to consider such self-mutil@tion.
Why would a rational person expect others to use grammatically incorrect language?
2
-
2
-
@martind2520 Just saying 'trans women are women' doesn't make it reality. Female is a biological category referring to one half of the sexual/reproductive binary dichotomy of ALL mammals, and Male is the other half.
You lost this debate before it started.
A man, presenting as, performing as, identifying as a woman doesn't then become a woman, is a reality that your arguments can't escape.
Gender/sex = biology, there are only 2 male/female...that's it.
Gender roles= social constructs referring to the roles of males and females in society, which don't change anyone's gender. A dude in a dress is still a dude.
I mean, a dude can dress in a fairy princess Halloween costume if he chooses, but it doesn't actually make him a fairy princess and it doesn't obligate everyone in society to pretend that he is.
I think it's humorous when someone says sex and gender are different, as if that doesn't make the narrative even more absurd. People aren't social constructs. Trans however, is a social construct, and doesn't alter anyone's gender/sex, so the saying trans women are women is just wrong
2
-
2
-
@dariocarraresi1823 Well, the English language has been well-established and well-defined, including pronouns of which the appropriate grammatically correct pronouns for a male (adult or minor) are he/him/his. Men ARE adult, human males-- so you can choose to call yourself a helicopter, but it doesn't alter your nature, as a male/man being your physical description. What's the problem/confusion??
If you're born with a vagina, you ARE a female. If you're an adult female, then you ARE a woman. What's the confusion? It's a primary biological sex characteristic of all female mammals-- including humans, not slur, a suggestion, preference, personality, or anything else.
Gay men aren't trans, and they're not attracted to vaginas by definition as I understand it, and they don't seem to have difficulty deciphering the differences between males and females. Why do the trans community seemed so confused about it??
Your problem is, words already in use, have long established meanings.
Another problem you have is you don't seem to recognize that personality traits and temperament aren't gender exclusive. (There are a ton and none alter your gender)
If you're a male identifying as a 'she', you're incorrectly using the language, and you're lying, portraying yourself as a caricature of a woman by mimicking her primary physical attributes, doesn't make a male a female. The definitions already exist
2
-
@dariocarraresi1823 I've addressed every point you brought up, and debunked your every assertion. Are YOU capable of answering my questions? I'll repost it, for you
The English language has been well-established and well-defined, including pronouns of which the appropriate grammatically correct pronouns for a male (adult or minor) are he/him/his. Men ARE adult, human males-- so you can choose to call yourself a helicopter, but it doesn't alter your nature, as a male/man being your physical description. What's the problem/confusion?? How is that insane?
If you're born with a vagina, you ARE a female. If you're an adult female, then you ARE a woman. What's the confusion? It's a primary biological sex characteristic of all female mammals-- including humans, not slur, a suggestion, preference, personality, or anything else. How is that insane?
Gay men aren't trans, and they're not attracted to vaginas by definition as I understand it, and they don't seem to have difficulty deciphering the differences between males and females. Why do the trans community seemed so confused about it?? How is that insane?
Your problem is, words already in use, have long established meanings.
Another problem you have is you don't seem to recognize that personality traits and temperament aren't gender exclusive. (There are a ton and none alter your gender) How is acknowledging that insane?
If you're a male identifying as a 'she', you're incorrectly using the language, and you're lying, portraying yourself as a caricature of a woman by mimicking her primary physical attributes, doesn't make a male a female. The definitions already exist, so how is using grammar properly, insane??
2
-
@dariocarraresi1823 No, they correctly note that those who you refer to as trans women-- are men, and their desire to be women is irrelevant. They also correctly note that men don't have vaginas-- whether they want them or not is irrelevant.
Cite the source of the stat you refer to re: 50% of trans women seek any form of medical transition, and the percentage who wants genital surgery is WAY smaller.
All people are human and part of the binary sexual dichotomy regardless of their appearance or feelings about their sexual biology.
Your framing of the narrative re: drag queens/dudes presenting as the sexual stereotypical caricature of women being predators and wanting to be women is intellectually disingenuous and false. Their feelings about not being women are irrelevant-- they're simply not women, and neither are any other males-- regardless of their feelings or attire.
Re: your narrative about gay men (or straight men for all that matter)-- they simply note their sexual preferences don't alter their gender/sex.
Re: your narrative that 'cis gay men would eventually become trans women'-- wrong again, you're horrible at this. I've already point out to you that ALL men are born male, all women are born female and neither are a social construct, feeling, fetish, preference, personality, nor a costume, making the cis/trans distinction entirely useless and intellectually vacant.
So, there you are-- and YOU still haven't debunked anything I've clarified for you and corrected you on your incorrect conclusions about your claims.
You seem to be looking for an argument, to displace your denial over a topic that's settled, where you've been proven wrong and dismissed with cause-- by reality.
Seethe if you must, but it doesn't change anything. You lost this debate before it started. A man performing as a woman doesn't then become a woman, is a reality that your 'because you said so' arguments can't escape.
Gender: The status of being either male or female. The entire purpose of the gender/sex division in most species of animal life is to facilitate procreation, the sexual identity of an individual is best classified according to the gametes produced by the person in question. There is no extant third gamete.
Cf. “Sex”. Both terms (“gender” and “sex”) originate from Latin words: “genus” (meaning “begin”; “birth”; “kind”; “race”; “gender”) and “sexus” (meaning “sex”; “division”; “gender”).
So, essentially, the only significant distinction between the two terms is that the etymology of “gender” pertains to the beginning of things, as can be plainly seen by the other English words that originate from "genus", such as “generic”, “genetic”, and “generate”, whilst “sex” is a scrupulously-literal translation of the Latin cognate “sexus”.
The mere fact that the word “genitals” (referring to reproductive organs) is very closely related to the Latin “genus” is further evidence of the assertion that the term “gender” refers to the binary division of human (and of course, many non-human) sexual identity, and NOT to any taxonomy based on emotion, feelings, psychology, or any other non-biological categorization schema. ;)
Way too many inappropriately and incorrectly conflate gender/sex (There are only 2-- male/female... That's it) with personality traits and temperament (There are a ton and none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys), and again with gender roles (without exception refer to the roles of males and females in society) as though they're synonymous and they are not.
Science has already proven that the binary dichotomy of all mammals is male/female.
A man in a dress is still a man
A man with anxiety about his sex/gender-- still a man
A man calling himself a woman-- still a man
A man with an effeminate personality--still a man
Seethe if you must, then just cope harder
You/They haven't put forth no reasoning that withstands scrutiny, rendering your/their narratives and opinions as less than useless and therefore invalid.
Your incoherent rants and claims of legitimacy, are figments of your imagination.
Reality isn't an anti-trans ideology. Trans is an anti-reality ideology, and they're the ones seeking affirmation, validation, and the participation of everyone in their larp and cosplay, based on the belief that their subjective delusions are based in reality. Newsflash: They aren't
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2