Comments by "C S ~ \x5bDuke of Ramble\x5d" (@DUKE_of_RAMBLE) on "The Enforcer"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
โโย @ะะผะธััะธะนะะฝะดัะธะฐะฝะพะฒ-ะน4ัย NATO invoking A.5 would be a GOOD thing, in my eyes...
Russia currently cannot even handle UKRAINE on its own (albeit, with supplies from others), so NATO doing so would effectively end the war, as Russia would be completely overwhelmed.
Now, I'm not saying they ought to attack Russia/Belarus, but to go in and help to remove their presence from Ukraine (and Crimea)!
And no, I do not think Putin is stupid enough to use nukes, even if NATO (or the UN) was to get involved in the capacity I've mentioned above...
However, if they pushed across their borders... THEN I would start to be concerned, but only then. Putin authorizing the use of even the small Tactical nuke, would spell his own death, by one means or another! He has shown he enjoys his life, and his power... So I do not see him doing anything brazen like that, as it would immediately threaten his own safety!
He's an asshole....
He's pretty stupid.....
But, his self-preservation is still fully functional.
Slava Ukraini! โ๐บ๐ฆ ๐ฑ
[edit: typo]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I've strongly said said the very first nuclear weapon that, that Russia will not go the nuclear route... It would be literal suicide for Putin. It would undoubtedly spur a joint black ops mission by many countries, to go in and take him out!
That's assuming the command actually gets carried out! Because I'm a bit torn on whether such command would be, since those subordinates would all know it would lead to Russia's demise, whereas disobeying it would only be the likely demise of that individual... but family and friends would probably survive. A worthy self sacrifice, in my opinion.
But yea, Russia's that's have ALWAYS been hollow, in my eyes.
Not just for the above reasoning either!
But because Putin wants Ukraine, and having irradiated pockets of land does you NO good!
Which one might say: "but, their plans for the dirty bombs with the power plant(s)"...
To which I say: Russians CLEARLY have no idea just how bad that would be, since they AREN'T TAUGHT ABOUT SUCH INCIDENTS!
Chornobyl (Ukrainian spelling), swept under the rug, and we already know Russia has no qualms about erasing history from their textbooks soccer it's happened already during this war... All one had to do is look towards their occupation of Chornobyl at the beginning of the war, and all the STUPID shit they were doing in the red zone. So soldiers and likely even those in command, probably thinks that turning a nuclear power plant into a dirty bomb would only be bad for a couple years, in the surrounding area. The concept of wine blowing irradiated dust into Russia is probably a foreign concept to them! ๐๐
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm starting to wonder, again, if Putin's mental health is compromised........ ๐คจ๐
Like, sincerely.
First, he clearly thinks he is doing well in this war (thinks he's winning, when he's only been fighting Ukraine... it'd be over in a month, if NATO/UN stepped in! lol).
Second, he thinks he has some untapped reservoir if well trained soldiers.
Third, he thinks he has some untapped reservoir of functional equipment.
In terms of conventional warfare, Russia just doesn't pose a threat to anyone, yet he's talking like he could steamroll Europe!
The only credible threat Russia possess to the outside world (they'll always be a threat to themselves) is a nuclear threat!
I've said it from the very beginning, I do not think Russia (Putin) is THAT stupid, to use nukes. He loves the power he has and wants to keep it. Using nukes would end his reign (and his country), and that's assuming his subordinates carry out their command to issue launch orders, or that those turning their launch keys will go through with it.
(granted, Russians have been indoctrinated to not think for themselves, so... maybe they would go through with it?? ๐คทโโ๏ธ๐ค๐)
Either way... Slava Ukraini! โ๐บ๐ฆ ๐ฑ
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
โโย @BalboBiggins-le1nlย Nuclear Weapons use their highly refined [see: "weapons grade"] fissil material to create an explosion of immense size.
Nuclear Power Plants, for starters, do not use weapons grade material.
Therefore, what they said it's 100% correct: a nuclear power plant is NOT a "nuclear weapon", and at worst it's a "dirty bomb".
A "dirty bomb" being any weapon that uses radioactive material, whose explosion is to DISPERSE said material across a very large area, blanketing it in radioactive particles. (ideally, these would be donated high above ground, to facilitate dispersal)
It's perfectly ok to not know about things and ask questions...
It's not ok when you don't know about things, and then say incorrect things with confidence, as though you're right...
โ๏ธ
edit: here's an analogy for you... think of it like alcohol...
Alcohol with a very high 'proof' (the '%', or ABV; 200 proof = 100% alcohol) is very flammable, and can even be used as fuel (ie: Ethanol). High Proof alcohol is therefore like Weapons Grade fissil material.
However, the vast majority of alcohol on the market is NOT high proof. They contain alot of water and sugars in them, and as such, isn't flammable. Most alcohol sold is therefore like Nuclear Fuel Rods and incapable of being used in an engine as an alternative fuel. (trying to run your vehicle on these will 'Hydrolock' your engine; even something quite flammable like Vodka isn't smart).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1