Comments by "Ralph Bernhard" (@ralphbernhard1757) on "Vox"
channel.
-
68
-
57
-
31
-
14
-
13
-
8
-
8
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
chained2it You are confusing two terms: 'Historicity' and 'Causality'.
In order for something to be 'causal', there MUST be a connection between and action, and the resulting events.
The one that comes first, MUST cause the next in the chain of events.
(Note, not to be confused with 'correlation')
So when you write "500 years ago Muslims dominated the globe (actually it was the Med and ME, Central Asia)..".
My answer is: nice, there are some ruins and buildings I can visit...
(In other words, NOTHING a Muslim did 500 years ago in Spain, or North Africa, has ANY bearing on world events today)
Muslim domination of the Med, etc. ENDED at the end of WW1. NO causal effects.
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2