Comments by "Markus Müller" (@markusmuller6173) on "ShanghaiEye魔都眼"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Inquisition exorcists of the Plandemic Religion meet again... (4:15) If China really supported peace talks, it would demand:
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
If there is an ancient region where people want to separate themselves from the "motherland" (or the occupier), then free elections should make that possible and (at least partially) enable separation and independence.
Because the "mother country" will no longer be able to lead this group of people without violence under the neglected and long outdated regulations anyway...
Many regions have published a demand for more independence [ Western Sahara, Tibet, Pyrenees, (Bavaria, Saxony ;) ... ]
But a possible (at least partial) separation should be driven by the desire of an (ethnic/historical regional-language) majority to be polled in an independent electoral process, and not driven by extremists...
(ballots in Basque, Cherokee, Tibetan, Swabian, Saxon...etc.)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
If China actually wanted peace, they could have proposed: The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must urgently be adapted to current global needs!
The right of veto for cross-border aggressors is to be abolished and the yes quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission has to be lowered to a 2/3 majority! Not only states of the UN Security Council already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed areas like: Kurdistan (northern Syria, western Iran), DR Congo, eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Berg -Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a contested region must of course also offer the possibility of completely self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia .... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we really only have such "representatives" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? Once people reward again good individual proposals for fair dispute resolution, (and compare, discuss, and select improved rules,) we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2