Comments by "Markus Müller" (@markusmuller6173) on "ShanghaiEye魔都眼"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
And all the words spoken cannot hide the fact that the action of the Puti-linskiy cartel is nothing but a large-scale expulsion of the population of eastern Ukraine to rob their resources and industrial assets!
The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolition of the right of veto for all cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for the deployment of a peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority.
After all, it is not only UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno Karabakh, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a region must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia)
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? As soon as people honor again good suggestions from individuals for fair dispute resolution (and compare, discuss and choose respective improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next step on the evolution ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
And all the words spoken cannot hide the fact that the action of the Puti-linskiy cartel is nothing but a large-scale expulsion of the population of eastern Ukraine to rob their resources and industrial assets!
The rules of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs! Abolition of the right of veto for all cross-border aggressors and reduction of the yes quorum for the deployment of a peacekeeping missions to a 2/3 majority.
After all, it is not only UN Security Council states that already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force to ensure fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas: Kurdistan, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno Karabakh, Tibet and Xinjiang, Palestine, Western Sahara...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a region must of course also offer the option of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that of Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia)
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration leads to bloody conflicts? As soon as people honor again good suggestions from individuals for fair dispute resolution (and compare, discuss and choose respective improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next step on the evolution ladder.
2
-
If there is an ancient region where people want to separate themselves from the "motherland" (or the occupier), then free elections should make that possible and (at least partially) enable separation and independence.
Because the "mother country" will no longer be able to lead this group of people without violence under the neglected and long outdated regulations anyway...
Many regions have published a demand for more independence [ Western Sahara, Tibet, Pyrenees, (Bavaria, Saxony ;) ... ]
But a possible (at least partial) separation should be driven by the desire of an (ethnic/historical regional-language) majority to be polled in an independent electoral process, and not driven by extremists...
(ballots in Basque, Cherokee, Tibetan, Swabian, Saxon...etc.)
2
-
2
-
2
-
@lillyshi2705 TRIPLE ASSESSMENT is explained in the descriptions of the playlists within "my" YT channel.
In short:
--- Let's formulate the following common political goal: "Internally, bosses must also become responsible to the grassroots, especially in groups with delegated powers (police, parties, governments, courts, media, banks, infrastructure, health system ... even church and military).
We know good, bad and ugly people in our (professional) environment. In order to support socially committed people and degrade charlatans, we need TRIPLE ASSESSMENTS by superiors, colleagues and subordinates that are effective for promotion up and down - everywhere and regularly!" ---
So you don't want to be aware of the gap between rich and poor in China and why it is like that ?!?
Those people who know you, do judge about how social commited you are, at least in their mind.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2