Comments by "Markus Müller" (@markusmuller6173) on "ShanghaiEye魔都眼"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Almost everything at the UN is unfocused disinformation!
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority.
Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
If there is an ancient region where people want to separate themselves from the "motherland" (or the occupier), then free elections should make that possible and (at least partially) enable separation and independence.
Because the "mother country" will no longer be able to lead this group of people without violence under the neglected and long outdated regulations anyway...
Many regions have published a demand for more independence [ Western Sahara, Tibet, Pyrenees, (Bavaria, Saxony ;) ... ]
But a possible (at least partial) separation should be driven by the desire of an (ethnic/historical regional-language) majority to be polled in an independent electoral process, and not driven by extremists...
(ballots in Basque, Cherokee, Tibetan, Swabian, Saxon...etc.)
2
-
@Len Attard Sure, I do have influence on the US foreign policy, but perhaps not in the same way, as you assume ...
If you aks me, how I would deal with territories, occupied or strangled by a dominant (mother-) country, I will answer this:
If there is an ancient region where people want to separate themselves from the "motherland" (or the occupier), then free elections should make that possible and (at least partially) enable separation and independence. Because the "governing country" will no longer be able to lead this group of people without violence under the neglected and long outdated regulations anyway...
Many regions have published a demand for more independence [ Western Sahara, Tibet, Pyrenees, (Bavaria, Saxony ;) ... ]
But a possible (at least partial) separation should be driven by the desire of an (ethnic/historical regional-language) majority to be polled in an independent electoral process, and not driven by extremists... (ballots in Basque, Cherokee, Tibetan, Swabian, Saxon...etc.)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2