Comments by "Deborah Freedman" (@deborahfreedman333) on "DW News"
channel.
-
5
-
5
-
I grew up in California as well. And lived in Los Angeles too. What you describe never, ever happened. California required you to vote in, and only in, your assigned polling place. I know this, because I lived in the SF Valley, but worked in Thousand Oaks, so had to leave work early on election day, spend an hour on the freeway, with all the other people heading to their polling place, so I could get to my assigned polling place, and vote. You couldn't just go from school to school, voting in each one. Stop making up total BS!
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
There are more than two parties, in the US, but their candidates seldom get enough votes to matter, just as in the UK. There are plenty of other countries, with parliamentary forms of government, where two parties dominate. This is not a function of our form of government. And, those countries, that use proportional representation, so that small parties can thrive, are in constant upheaval, constantly have a difficult time forming coalitions, and constantly going back to elections. Many small parties only makes things worse. The US problem is, we based our government on the UK government, with a president rather than a king, When the US government was designed, the Senate was based upon the House of Lords. Australia and Canada did the same. But, the UK, and those other countries, have now made their Lords/Senate an advisory body only, with no real power, while the US has not. We need not form a parliamentary government, to reduce the power of the Senate, merely a constitutional amendment. Also, the archaic Electoral College, is anti-democratic, although it would be less so, if the number of Electors a state has, were based only on the number of Representatives. Either that, or going to the popular vote, could be effected with an amendment. As far as making US elections better reflect the view of voters, another party will not do anything, as long as it is more extreme than the two main parties. If, however, a third moderate party were formed, that could absorb the disaffected Democrats and Republicans, sick at how extreme their parties have become, the two main parties would be forced move back towards the center. And that does not require a parliamentary government.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3