Comments by "Regis Glass" (@regisglass5464) on "Jubilee" channel.

  1.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you defend it: "it isn't due to discrimination". thus, per seeing the evidence, thank you for agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap. Why defend it?
    1
  2.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "I defend it" Why do you defend supervisors making less than their subordinates? But thank you for at least agreeing with the feminists that the wage gap is real
    1
  3.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "I defend it" thus the question you avoid, why do you defend supervisors making less than their subordinates? after all, you saw the evidence and backtracked to defend supervisors earning less.
    1
  4.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you defend it: "it isn't due to discrimination". so again, as we agree this is wrong, why ignore the evidence?
    1
  5.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you defend it: "it isn't due to discrimination". so again, as we agree this is wrong, why ignore the evidence?
    1
  6.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you defend it upon seeing evidence: "it isn't due to discrimination". so again, as we agree said wage gap exists, why ignore the evidence?
    1
  7.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" and "there is a wage gap overall" so as we agree the wage gap exists, why ignore the evidence?
    1
  8.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" and "there is a wage gap overall" again, as we agree the wage gap exists, why ignore the evidence?
    1
  9.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" and "there is a wage gap overall" again, as we agree the wage gap exists, why ignore the evidence?
    1
  10.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" and "there is a wage gap overall" as we agree the wage gap exists and you then write "vvomen deserve to be paid less than men", thank you for showing exactly why feminism exists
    1
  11. @DavidW-ux2gc  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" and "there is a wage gap overall" as you then write "vvomen deserve to be paid less than men", thank you for showing exactly why feminism exists.
    1
  12.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" and "there is a wage gap overall" as we agree the wage gap exists but you defend it by writing that "vvomen deserve to be paid less than men", thank you for showing why feminism exists
    1
  13.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "do you have any arguments as to why the wage gap shouldn't exist?" Again, thank you for accepting the wage gap is real. So why is it correct supervisors earn less than their subordinates?
    1
  14.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "do you have any arguments as to why the wage gap shouldn't exist?" then you answer yourself: "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Again, thank you for accepting the wage gap is real. So why is it correct supervisors earn less than their subordinates? why is it correct women earn less for doing the same thing men do?
    1
  15.  @DavidW-ux2gc  "do you have any arguments as to why the wage gap shouldn't exist?" then you answer yourself: "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" again, thank you for showing the feminists are correct as per the evidence you just saw. So why is it correct women earn less for doing the same thing as men?
    1
  16. ​ @DavidW-ux2gc "do you have any arguments as to why the wage gap shouldn't exist?" then you answer yourself: "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" thank you for showing the feminists are correct as per the evidence you saw. Why pretend otherwise? And please don't lie
    1
  17. Why?
    1
  18. ​ @PinocchioDread no, that one has an even more depressing answer. Turns out most custody cases are solved outside of the courtroom by men just saying they don't want to care for the children. So the MRAs saying men are inherently worse parents clearly aren't helping
    1
  19.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for being an example
    1
  20.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, than you for being an example of the MRAs self sabotaging
    1
  21.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, thank you for showing exactly how the MRA's self sabotage
    1
  22.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus I thank you for showing MRAs either self sabotage or do nothing in helping men choose to be father's.
    1
  23. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv thank you for thus accepting the other is wrong in blaming feminism
    1
  24.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "it's the men's choice" again, thank you for agreeing the other is mistaken about feminism
    1
  25.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "it's the men's choice" again, thank you for agreeing the other is mistaken about feminism
    1
  26.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "it's the men's choice" again, thank you for agreeing the other is mistaken about feminism while MRAs only self sabotage
    1
  27.  @DavidW-ng5zv  "it's the men's choice" again, thank you for agreeing the other is mistaken about feminism while MRAs only self sabotage
    1
  28. ​ @DavidW-ng5zv  apologies, but you deflected again. If you believe seeing men as equal parents "demonizes" families, isn't that showing why feminism is needed? Would you like to write what NOMAS stands for?
    1
  29. I don't think women should be pushed to have sex with people like Derrick because you think it'll stop mass shootings.
    1
  30. At 5:00, why do you think derrick having said women are like children is an apology; and at 15:16, why is it normal the MRA asks how and where she was assaulted that you get angry she answered? Isn't the fact that you are angry the feminist detailed how she was assaulted also answer 13:53, 17:31, 19:28, 21:29? At 16:22, don't the feminists answer the question by opposing the MRA's saying men are lesser parents or why does that show MRA's should exist (14:28)?
    1
  31.  @Russell_Russ  thank you for accepting the other was asking about how and where she was assaulted. Thus, why are you angry that she then answered? Please note your answer shows as such, ie, you believe her answer is a "rant" even though you admit she is answering
    1
  32.  @DavidW-ng5zv  and doesn't your comment specifically show the feminists as correct since you feel offense at her describing her assault? But thank you for accepting the feminist did answer the MRA demanding to know where and how she was assaulted.
    1
  33. ​​​ @Russell_Russ "Women don't care about men's issues, period" As stated, per you being angry at women as a whole, isn't that showing why the feminists are correct? Recall you already agreed the MRA wanted details about how the feminist was assaulted so it seems odd you pretended otherwise. If you wish, why not present anything the MRAs do to help men?
    1
  34. PS please note you also deflected from my queries. I will repaste them here so you may answer them: At 5:00, why do you think derrick having said women are like children is an apology? At 15:16, why is it normal the MRA asks how and where she was assaulted that you get angry she answered? Isn't the fact that you are angry the feminist detailed how she was assaulted also answer 13:53, 17:31, 19:28, 21:29? At 16:22, don't the feminists answer the question by opposing the MRA's saying men are lesser parents or why does that show MRA's should exist (14:28)?
    1
  35.  @DavidW-ux2gc  that's odd. The MRA requesting details about her assault is a guilt trip? Seems odd responding to his question is emotional manipulation. Again, isn't that showing the feminists were correct as you feel offense at the MRA having his questions answered?
    1
  36.  @DavidW-ux2gc  ​thus my question. Again, as you agree the MRA requested details about her assault, why is her answering a guilt trip? As you believe answering the MRA's question is emotional manipulation, doesn't that show the feminists were correct as you are angry the MRA was answered?
    1
  37. ​​ @DavidW-ux2gc per being angry to the point you now pretend the MRA demanding details is her fault, isn't that showing the feminists were correct?
    1
  38. PS and you avoided my query. Again, what have MRAs done to help men?
    1
  39.  @Russell_Russ  apologies, but you still avoid my queries. You are entitled to believe of me as you wish, but kindly answer them: 1) At 5:00, why do you think derrick saying women are like children is an apology? 2) At 15:16, why is it normal the MRA asks how and where the feminist was assaulted to the point you became angry she answered? 3) Isn't the fact that you are angry the feminist detailed how she was assaulted also answer 13:53, 17:31, 19:28, 21:29? 4) At 16:22 don't the feminists answer the question per opposing the MRA's saying men are lesser parents, or why is the MRAs seeing men as lesser helpful (14:28)?
    1
  40.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus, per being so angry you pretend the MRA demanding details of her assault is the feminists fault, isn't that showing the feminists were correct? Seems odd the details the MRA demanded were so terrible that you consider answering the question a guilt trip. Likewise, what issue about men did the MRAs bring up that they didn't also sabotage?
    1
  41.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thus my statement (which you avoid). Per being so angry you pretend the MRA didn't demand details of her assault, isn't that showing the feminists were correct?
    1
  42.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for accepting the MRA demanded details about her being assaulted. Thus, why is answering his question emotional manipulation?
    1
  43.  @DavidW-ux2gc  precisely, why are you so angry that you are pretending they didn't ask about it?
    1
  44.  @DavidW-ux2gc  certainly you are. Otherwise why pretend the MRA demanding the feminist give him details about her being assaulted is the feminists manipulating him? That's a very emotional position, or why did you get upset about her answering his question?
    1
  45.  @DavidW-ux2gc  certainly you are, and i request you control yourself to answer my query. Thus, why pretend the MRA demanding details about the feminist being assaulted is the feminists fault? Why get upset over her answering his question?
    1
  46.  @DavidW-ux2gc  certainly you are, note how you pretend the MRA asking details over her being abused is the feminist doing so. Thus, why get upset that the MRA demanding details about abuse was answered? Seems odd answering this "simple" question brought such an emotional response from you. Please note, I am not insulting you. You actually are replying emotionally like the other was, eg, the other believes all women hate men and you believe answering the MRA is emotional manipulation. Again, doesn't your comment specifically show why the feminists were correct? Kindly control yourself like the feminist did in order to answer the query.
    1
  47.  @Russell_Russ  you are welcome to believe of me as you wish. However, you still avoid my queries. Kindly answer them.
    1
  48.  @DavidW-ng5zv  note you continue being emotional by now stating the MRA being answered is irrelevant to the debate. Or are you upset that the feminists are shown correct by the MRA asking said question?
    1
  49.  @DavidW-ng5zv  again, kindly control your emotions in order to cease pretending the MRA asking how she was abused is unrelated to him being answered. Or are you upset that the feminists are shown correct by the MRA asking said question and receiving an answer?
    1
  50.  @DavidW-ng5zv  thank you for controlling your emotions in this debate and accepting the only reason the feminist brought up her abuse was because the MRA wanted details about it (though it seems odd you later state her answer was before the MRA asked it). Regardless, as you also accept she was correct in answering the MRA's question, isn't that you agreeing the feminists have a point?
    1