General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Regis Glass
Jubilee
comments
Comments by "Regis Glass" (@regisglass5464) on "Jubilee" channel.
Previous
9
Next
...
All
The MRAs were pretty bad, they basically spent the entire debate having things explained to them.
2
@kritikabasu9503 i have watched the video. at one point the feminists were talking about the prevalence of SA and his response was to say feminism was wrong. if i missed something, would you write it?
2
@kritikabasu9503 but that's why i am asking you, what points did he give? as far as i am aware, he never said anything except that feminism is wrong. for example, when all the feminists agreed that men and women were equals, he replied that feminism was wrong. when one of the feminists affirmed that feminism helps single fathers, he replied that feminism was wrong (which was ironic because the other MRA's kept saying men are biologically worse parents).
2
@SwampthingDUK hence my question, since the feminists in the video actually were sexually assaulted, ie, not a hypothetical situation like with your example, does that mean anything to you?
2
Isn't the question literally him asking for an example of how the women were harassed?
2
They don't think women should have rights. Two of the MRAs literally don't think men and women are equal (but different).
2
so you agree the wage gap is a problem when male nurses are paid more than female nurses? i mean they are doing the same thing since they are both nurses
2
Ironically, the MRAs disagree with this because they think men are biologically lesser parents. The feminists at least say both parents are equals
2
@DavidW-ux2gc then why do the MRA's disagree with you?
2
You know the weird thing is that not even the MRAs could answer that
2
@DavidW-ng5zv excellent question. what issues do the MRA's present?
2
@michelledertinger as you agree feminists have done as you demanded, ie, legalized women fighting in the military in 2015, yet it doesn't change your opinion of them, why are you actually against feminism fighting for equality?
2
@buchholzstephen7562 so the differences mean that women are like children and men their parents, or why did he compare women to children?
2
@ssamohtttelps1435 then why did the MRA's agree with derrick? seems weird you are aware derrick is wrong yet somehow see the MRA's agreeing with him as different
2
I am confused, you mean men wouldn't be angry about being attacked and not believed over it?
2
ironically the mra's actually foment this when they state women are inherently less capable than men. clearly the more dangerous people gets a stricker sentence than the ones who, per derricks words, are like children
2
@DavidW-ng5zv then as you state women are inherently weaker than men, isn't that you defending that men get worse criminal sentences?
2
@don5241 glad i could help. I also apologize as it seemed strange you believed MRAs seeing men as lesser was helping men.
2
@EppicGracie96 it's true, while there is discrimination against men in custody cases, men overwhelmingly (and i mean about 90% of the time) don't want custody.
2
@lilnotmaster6094 excellent, thank you for accepting the majority of women are employed. You can be angry that the elderly are not if you wish. Thus, is that not accepting women do obtain their own things?
2
@lilnotmaster6094 you are entitled to believe so when 40% of households have women as the main breadwinners. Again, you are entitled to be angry that most women have jobs and that men also get things in a divorce.
2
@simpledanman that's odd, then you didn't see any of the video since the MRAs present their views at the beginning? Why state derrick is the worst MRA if all believe the same as him?
2
@DavidW-ng5zv then why is it only an anti-feminist who said women shouldn't be financially independent?
2
@DavidW-ng5zv apologies, but the wage gap is a verified reality. For example, note women are 90% of nurses but are still paid less than men.
2
It's odd nearly no one here has seen the video
1
@DavidW-ux2gc then why are only the feminists helping men?
1
@DavidW-ng5zv "Only weak men can't control their emotional." thank you for showing why only feminists help men
1
@DavidW-ng5zv "Only weak men can't control their emotional" again, thank you for showing why only feminists help men. Or are you backtracking from having agreed with the other stating one must control their emotions?
1
@DavidW-ng5zv precisely, people should control their emotions as crying is better than committing acts of violence. thank you for thus agreeing with the feminists.
1
@DavidW-ng5zv apologies, do you not consider fatherhood pertinent?
1
@regisshiv3542 you can believe so if you wish, but the fact that all of you constantly change the subject or outright lie about what the MRAs say does show why only feminists help men.
1
@DavidW-ng5zv then as you deflected, again, do you don't consider custody cases an important issue for men? Do you believe men are lesser parents?
1
@DavidW-ng5zv then as you noted fatherhood is important, do you believe the MRAs when they say men are lesser parents?
1
@DavidW-ng5zv again, as you noted fatherhood is important, do you state the MRAs did not say this because admitting they did would mean when they harm men?
1
i actually knew a woman who made less than men despite being a supervisor
1
@DavidW-ng5zv that's a strange response. why do you believe supervisors are supposed to make less than their subordinates?
1
@DavidW-ux2gc thus my question: why do you believe supervisors are supposed to make less than their subordinates? interestingly enough, female nurse supervisors (sometimes even nurse CEO's) also earn less than male subordinates
1
@DavidW-ux2gc apologies, but we already agreed the pay gap exists. you merely stated that it was justifiable. are you avoiding my question because you don't like agreeing with feminists?
1
@DavidW-ux2gc then again, why do you believe supervisors are supposed to make less than their subordinates? after all, every male CEO works less than their subordinates. do you avoid my query because you agreed with the feminists?
1
@DavidW-ux2gc "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates." correct, yet you still attempt to justify women making less than their male subordinates. so aren't you agreeing with the feminists?
1
@DavidW-ux2gc "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates." and yet you still wrote this. are you trying to say you don't agree with feminists due to some weird emotional baggage? because you are agreeing the wage gap exists, you are just trying to justify it
1
@DavidW-ux2gc the emotional baggage brought by you writing "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" and then justifying female supervisors earning less than their subordinates "because there are multiple factors at play". either way, thank you for recalcitrantly agreeing with the feminists.
1
@DavidW-ux2gc "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" yet you agree female supervisors earning less than their subordinates is wrong. thus, thank you for recalcitrantly agreeing with the feminists.
1
@DavidW-ux2gc "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" note you agree female supervisors earning less than their subordinates is wrong. thus, thank you for recalcitrantly agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap by seeing the proof yourself
1
@DavidW-ux2gc "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Hence the wage gap. Again, thank you gor agreeing female supervisors earning less than their subordinates is wrong. thus, thank you for recalcitrantly agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap
1
@DavidW-ux2gc "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you notice this does happen, so you backtrack: "it isn't due to discrimination". thus, thank you for recalcitrantly agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap.
1
@DavidW-ux2gc "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you try to defend it: "it isn't due to discrimination". thus, thank you for agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap. Why defend it?
1
@DavidW-ux2gc "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you try to defend it: "it isn't due to discrimination". thus, per seeing the evidence, thank you for agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap. Why defend it?
1
@DavidW-ux2gc "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you defend it: "it isn't due to discrimination". thus, per seeing the evidence, thank you for agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap. Why defend it?
1
@DavidW-ux2gc "Supervisors are not meant to make less than subordinates" Then you defend it: "it isn't due to discrimination". thus, per seeing the evidence, thank you for agreeing with the feminists about the wage gap. Why defend it?
1
Previous
9
Next
...
All