Comments by "Zrips" (@Zripas) on "Engineering Explained"
channel.
-
1
-
No idea how its win win, and no, your modern american truck is still constrained by space. Do you expect it magically to not require bunch of extra space to fit all those hydrogen tanks in it? Or do you want to make those american trucks even bigger? Space issue remains independent of car type and size.
This video was about V8 engine, by my knowledge V8 eats way more fuel than, well, any lover V's does, right? Your double performance is in comparison to actually economical hydrogen combustion engine, might be V4 or even V3, not a V8.
Fuel cells break, but those break less than combustion engines. Why do you think there are no actual hydrogen combustion based mass produced cars? Because its a big issue when it comes to actual maintenance costs of those. Its just a expensive toy.
And for f**k sakes, why do people keep bringing up BEV's into this conversation? This V8 can't even compete with fuel cell, why even bring in something else into conversation?
1
-
@Rene-uz3eb
That's cool and all, but increasing car size will increase fuel consumption. So pick any of your super duper sized truck and try to shove in few cylindrical tanks in it. All that extra space you got from this super duper super sized truck gained would be lost, so what's the point? Your truck already utilized more or less max amount of space, just like every other car. There aren't just huge empty voids in cars chassy where you could just put in multiple tanks without compromising something.
Google Toyota Mirai, its hydrogen car, it has 3 tanks to get 400 mile range. This is equivalent to basic car with 400 mile range, but, try to compare actual usable space in it, because Mirai suffers from huge central console (has one of the tanks there), small back seat (again, tank under it) and small trunk (yes, tank under it).
1
-
1
-
@Rene-uz3eb
Hydrogen tanks expire based on time, not on refuel cycles, this is why those have expiration dates. You might extend their lifespan if you avoid filling them to the max, but you will still have that same expiration date after which you will HAVE to replace those independent on how much they degraded over time.
And yes, its a crazy idea. Combustion engine on its core is silly idea as hydrogen fuel cell produces twice the energy, aka you can travel double the distance. And what exactly do you win by wasting energy with combustion engine? Sound... That's it... There are no other "benefit" besides it making similar sound to petrol one, everything else goes into negatives, including price, maintenance cost, refueling costs, usable space...
1
-
@Rene-uz3eb
Cryo hydrogen is non option due to mentioned boiloff. No one in their right mind would want a fuel which just evaporates if you are not using your car and you would be risking to be stranded if you not used your car for few days. Money thrown away. And no, you can't just fill up before each trip, share amount of equipment needed for this would be more than the car itself in cost and in maintenance. Again, no one in their right mind would pick that option. So compressed gas it is.
BEV's keeps improving on regular basis, its generally most convenient and cheapest option out there as alternative for gasoline cars. Hydrogen fuel cells would be second option, third would be, maybe, e-fuel type cars, then maybe hydrogen combustion. Aka your combustion engines would maybe kind of potentially work for heavy machinery, kind of, not really tho, as you could still get better performance and cheaper maintenance from fuel cell.
Point is that hydrogen came in too late for it to become anything more than someone rich guys expensive toy, we got better solution.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1