Comments by "" (@billyandrew) on "GBNews"
channel.
-
418
-
41
-
Unfortunately, your life won't change, if she ever wakes up.
The lockdowns, as was intended, have sundered society.
The mistrust engendered remains, but not only the fears fostered in the vaccinated towards the unvaccinated, but generation against generation, family members against family members, against friends, neighbours, colleagues.
Divided individuals mean less concerted attempts to call those supposed to represent us to account, as folk focus, instead, on acrimonious events in their personal lives.
My condolences on your situation.
I hope you can eventually work things out for the benefit of your family, but that will, at best, take quite some time.
5
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
@alanladams
Have a look at your second constitution.
No, it isn't a typo or error, Alan.
It was enacted in secret in 1871 by Grant and both parties and is entitled US Inc!
It opened the door for birth certificates, in 1900, then the Fed, in 1910.
Both set the ground for 1913, at which point, forty-two years later, Wilson and, again, both parties sold the land, goods and people to a cartel of zionist bankers, who legally converted the entire deal into a Corporation that pays taxes directly to the English Crown!
Do you understand what this meant and means?
All 97 million Americans (the last Americans in the legal sense!), became the property of the Corporation, they became legal slaves, as are their current 300 million or so descendants!
Birth certificates became the means of keeping track of them, while the Fed controlled the vast wealth they continue to generate annually.
Of course, a Corporation is a business and, as such, is not permitted to name itself after a country, past or present, so the owners named their business United States, dropping the America part of the title.
The American people were stabbed in the back by two presidents, all of the politicians, the zionist bankers and the Crown and the betrayal continues to this day.
Both 'parties' are an illusion.
It's a Corporation!
Since when do politicians run a Corporation?
They are overseers to the 300+ million slaves, acting as proxies for the legal masters/owners, serving their interests, not those of the slaves!
Naturally, I don't expect you to take my word for it, so encourage you to undertake your own research.
It won't take you long to verify what I'm stating is true.
Welcome down the rabbit hole!
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Peter Gordon
Why deny the irrefutable?
Scotland already is independent!
I actively encourage you to actually research the subject, instead of gullibly pursuing the 'official' narrative in a programmed manner.
The matter at hand is the repeal of the political and financial treaty of 1707, namely, the Act of Union, wherein articles 18 and 19 clearly state that the act is not being signed in perpetuity and the Sovereignty of both Scotland and it's equally Sovereign people is not up for grabs, then, now or at any point in the future.
England consigned the document on that understanding.
Please, desist from posting ill informed and ignorant comments on social platforms pertaining tto something you clearly know nothing about!
Forget Sturgeon and the SNP, operating out of a shared asset building, (Holyrood) unlawfully applying English parliamentary procedures, contrary to Scottish law and the Scottish Constitution.
She/they and Wastemonster have a vested interest in maintaining the farce.
That, however, does not excuse your woeful lack of familiarity with facts.
I'll leave you to your studies, hopefully resulting in you becoming wiser, as a consequence.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ah, but the UK public, in general, is entirely responsible.
Those that didn't vote enabled the vile beings to gain power.
Those that voted tory enabled the vile beings to gain power.
The modern labour party are no different, they're just mildly diluted tories that performed a coup in the labour party on behalf of their zionist controllers.
That was their remit, get the socialists and pro Palestinian members out of the party.
The plan went no further than that.
Suddenly the tories began regularly pressing the self-destruct button and Stammer's controllers saw the opportunity of a lifetime, so instructed him to get off his now fat, lazy arse and try looking like a viable choice, hence the big change in him in recent months.
If the tories hadn't imploded he'd still be sitting, moping on the opposition bench, offering half hearted, wishy-washy protest.
1
-
1
-
@jamiemcaloon5548
Of course it's rigged, Jamie.
Wastemonster arranged it that way.
That's what devolved power is all about...authority invested by Wastemonster into their Scottish branch, Holyrood, operating under English parliamentary laws and regulations, themselves retaining the important powers.
It's a foreign agency on Scottish soil and Holyrood is collaborating, contrary to Scottish law and the Scottish Constitution.
Had Sturgeon or the snp truly had Scotland's best interests at heart they would not have wasted time and money jumping through ridiculous legal hoops that were designed to lead to a dead end.
The Act of Union, 1707 is a series of articles.
Article 18 sets out clearly that the fiscal and political treaty, because that is all it ever was, nothing more, is not being signed in perpetuity, therefore either or both parties can walk away from the deal at any point they want.
Article 19 states that every man, woman and child in Scotland are Sovereigns/Lieges and so is Scotland.
As such they were, are and will always be independent.
That's why we have seperate laws, because our Sovereignty and independence are both written into our's.
England willingly co-signed their copy and our's on those terms.
England is the exact opposite.
When the nobles cornered King John, forcing him to sign the Magna Carta 1215, they not only divested him of total authority, but bestowed Sovereignty upon themselves.
They then carried that authority through to the creation of the English parliament, investing parliament with equal Sovereignty.
Remember, at that point, they were the only ones allowed to vote.
In time, rich benefactors, landowners, etc, bought their way to the vote.
The working class, the Commoners, fought battles for the right and, eventually, women fighting their own battles, finally won the right to vote.
Parliament and the Monarchy are Sovereign, neither of them truly answerable to the Commoners.
In Scotland any Scottish govt (Monarchy, too) is answerable to we Sovereigns/Lieges.
We can dismiss them without letting them finish any term they imagined they still had left to serve in office.
In the case of the Monarchy we can replace it or dispense with the office entirely.
With govt we can dissolve it, having instructed it to arrange a general election.
Should either Monarchy or govt refuse to follow our will it is an act of High Treason, according to our law!
Naturally, once we have revoked the Union, a GE will be required, within a short period of time, allowing us to shape our own future.
Can you imagine the repercussions, not just in England, but around the world, as the first true democracy in modern history emerges?
Robert the Bruce, 105 years after the Magna Carta, was nobody's fool.
He deliberately divested himself of total authority, but bypassed the nobility, bestowing the authority of Sovereignty upon the people, then put total control beyond the reach of the nobles in the Declaration of Arbroath 1320.
He made himself first among equals.
Is that ringing any bells?
We'll see a major move, later this year, when SALVO drag Wastemonster though the ICJ on charges of fraud.
Nothing will be held in camera, so the whole dirty business will be shown to the entire world.
I'm looking forward to it.
Me, I distrust Holyrood and some parties equally.
I don't gamble, myself, but hear the bookies have earmarked this year for a GE.
I'll be voting tactically, as they're all a means to an end in my eyes.
As my wee, fat maw used to say: "Why have a dog and bark?!"
1
-
@Jack29245
My statement still stands, Jack.
The non voters hold the balance.
If they continue refusing to vote, then an snp alliance will take the day, again.
The entire nation is not obliged to vote.
All that is required is that the majority of those that do vote do so for a party determined to revoke the Union.
No law requires it must be a majority of the populace, only that it be a majority of those that vote.
Many unionists were in the older age group, seduced by promises of MaxDevo and scared by propaganda.
May they rest in peace, but many of them have passed on, since 2014, replaced by younger folk who know only Westmonster's austerity, corruption, mismanagement and so on, so they will judge on those issues.
The younger voters will also be aware of their own lack of opportunities, etc and I cannot see them as gullible enough to fall for the better-the-devil-you-know routine, as others have in the past.
Some will even be first time voters.
Wastemonster's day is almost over.
Sadly, it lacks dignity and good grace and I, personally, look forward to the coup de grace being applied, so Scotland can move forward to a brighter, better future.
1
-
@Lee Mollison
And who will we punish, Lee?
Big Pharma and the politicians are legally exempt.
The Western media are owned by just six corporations, who will claim they were misled by the other two.
And where, with the vast majority of the public vaxxed, would we find support to prosecute the others that have no immunity?
We can only create a partial boycott of news outlets, as the gullible will continue to keep them in business.
Me, I haven't bought a newspaper or watched tv in over forty years.
It isn't much, in the grand scheme of things, but I haven't, as a result, been complicit in their lies by financing them.
Seven and a half billion folk on the planet.
If every non vaxxed person, plus those that now finally understand what they actually signed up to in the first place, let's say 5%, decided to boycott these news oulets, then it would make quite a dent in their revenue stream.
They own the system, or at least those that control them do, so they will never face justice, but at least we can ensure their bank accounts don't overflow with our cash.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dovetonsturdee7033
I require evidence to back up the spurious claim that at least half of Scotland is in support of the Union.
That's me applying critical thinking.
I didn't state figures, the commentator did, displaying confirmation bias, ergo the onus of proof is upon them, that's how it works and you, demanding proof to the contrary on my part, is a piss poor example of constructive argument, evading the issue either out of fear of cognitive dissonance or out of ignorance.
You obviously have an oversensitive nature, if a matter of banter is, in your eyes, abuse.
This is gentle repartee by Scottish standards.
1
-
@sugarkane4830
2014.
Time and circumstances have moved on in the intervening years and all of it detrimental to not only Scotland's interests, but the UK, as a whole.
62% of Scotland voted to stay in the EU.
As a consequence of Brexit the Scottish economy has suffered badly.
Even the BOE stated it was a colossal mistake to not just Scotland's economy, but the UK, too.
The billions squandered or given to friends, etc, by the Wastemonster govt, during the pandemic, not only beggars belief, but the pockets of every taxpayer.
The removal of bonus caps for bankers springs to mind, the rapid increase in taxes, in inflation, in food costs, in rents and mortgages, in utility bills, in food banks, in child poverty, in general poverty, etc bear looking at.
The Wastemonster govt is not fit for purpose.
Just a few reasons for revoking the union, you understand.
Besides, were you to know anything about Scottish law or the Scottish Constitution, you would understand that, unlike England, every man, woman and child in Scotland is Sovereign/Liege.
In other words, our govt is not, therefore is answerable to us.
If we tell it we want one referendum or ten referenda, it is obliged to carry out our will.
You can see the advantage over Wastemonster, which can and often does trample over the Commoners, I trust?
The snp is currently under investigation by Police Scotland for the sum of £600,000 mysteriously *disappearing'
Can you imagine if the people had the power to compel the English police to investigate the missing pandemic £billions?
So, to recap, the Act of Union 1707 was never anything more than a straightforward fiscal and political treaty, contrary to what many are deliberately misled into believing.
Naturally, I do not expect you to take my word for it and actively encourage you to undertake your own research into the subject.
Basically, the deal is no longer to Scotland's taste, so we intend revoking the union.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not anti English.
Few Scots are, in the same way few English folk are anti Scottish.
That doesn't suit Wastemonster and the Establishment, so they try stirring things up, as divide and conquer has proven so successful for them, throughout history.
Take the media, for example.
Let's say you buy the Mirror, for argument's sake, before getting the train from London to Glasgow.
It will have an anti Scottish slant to it.
Having read it on your journey, you might pass it on to a fellow traveller or bin it, as you alight at the station, but if you go to the newsagent on the concourse and buy the same paper, a few hours and a few hundred miles apart you will find it has an anti English angle to it.
Fact of the matter is I lived and worked in England for 30 yrs and only returned to Scotland for work.
I have family still there and friends, too.
I hope that has helped you understand a few things.
1
-
1