Comments by "" (@billyandrew) on "GBNews"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@William Rogers
The vast majority of the folk in Scotland bear no ill will towards their English counterparts.
Similarly, most English folk, like yourself, feel the same about Scotland.
Unfortunately, on both sides of the border, we are cursed with the tiniest minority, all of them pathetic excuses for human beings with low IQs and high levels of inferiority complexes, that thrive on bigotry, zenophobia and racism, who are, rightly, ignored by decent, intelligent folk, especially when these imbeciles claim to be speaking for everyone.
The majority of Scots have an unabiding hatred of Wastemonster and the ruling English class.
Many English folk do, as well, however, msn, the propaganda arm of the self appointed elites, is only too happy to exploit the vitriolic bile of the brainless few, making a mountain out of a molehill and, in the process, the neanderthals imagine there are far more of them than the ragtag little gang there is, due to their gullibility.
Many of us have relatives either side of the border.
At the very least, trade will continue and folk will visit kin, etc.
Scotland will be wealthy, England will be vastly poorer and I strongly suspect many folk will relocate to Scotland, in order to give their families a better life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@M N
Tell me, when was the divorce between you and reality finalised?
For the last twelve years, in both local and general elections, the people of Scotland have returned the SNP to government.
To have done so means the party has been elected by the majority of voters.
That's how democracy works in the real world, outside of your little world, in your head, where fantasy appears to be running rampant.
The majority of voters, North of the border, vote for the SNP, because it is part of the party's manifesto.
In other words, the majority of Scots voters would probably think you are soft in the head, unable to understand basic facts or are a barefaced liar.
😂😂😂
1
-
1
-
Those media outlets, every last one of them, in the West, are owned by just six corporations!
Now do you understand?
I had a video, about seven or eight years ago, in one of my utube collections.
Forty-eight English speaking TV channels, UK, US, Oz, etc, every last one of them giving verbatim news reports with not one single change in coverage!
Those six Corporations have more finance behind them and batteries of lawyers than we have sticks to shake.
We cannot silence their lies, unless we collectively agree to stop reading and viewing them, thereby starving them of income.
No viewers, readers, means advertisers would abandon them, but too many remain gullible for that to even be a remote possibility.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ScottishRoss
Well, Eleanor's opinion has been dismissed by NS, because NS has disagreed with Eleanor's programmed opinion.
Eleanor, like all narcissists, who take any form of disagreement to their self appointed authority based, not on it being bestowed by merit, but simply on the process of osmosis, has taken it as a personal attack, as they are unable to distinguish between themselves and the stance they take, said stance being one of never being wrong, ergo above criticism.
Sadly, Eleanor never developed the ability of critical thinking, so will never progress beyond her mentally and emotionally arrested stage and is rightfully deserving of pity, as she casts about seeking reasons for umbrage, demanding apologies for imagined slights.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Thanks but no, thanks, Clark.
Scotland has suffered enough at the psycho hands of Wastemonster and a more narcissistic business partner cannot be imagined.
That, after all, is what the Act of Union 1707 is about...a political and business treaty and not, as everyone has always been led to believe, anything more than that!
Within the treaty can be found article 18 and article 19, both of which make it abundantly clear that Scotland, the country, is Sovereign, therefore independent, and has been, since the Declaration of Arbroath 1320 will always remain so and the matter was not up for discussion.
The articles further state that every man, woman and child in Scotland are Sovereigns/Leiges, therefore independent people and are subjugate only to Scottish Law.
England, in co-signing, was totally conversant with these terms.
Scotland was, is and always will be independent.
What we seek, in essence, is the annulment of the business partnership.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mickyboy7586
Nonsense, Micky.
I can provide reams of evidence that proves Scotland will flourish, while England will wither.
Just look at the UK debt alone.
Wastemonster borrows, yet Scotland never recieves any of the money borrowed.
The same is true of Wales and Ireland, but let's just deal with Scotland, here.
It comprises 5.4 million people, which makes up 8.3% of the UK population, yet it pays 22% of England's debt!
And before paying that it has 1.8% of it's GDP taken by the UK defence budget.
Just look at SHELL's recent posted profits...£32.2 billion.
Scotland's oil, let's not forget, but more about that later.
Anyway, Wastemonster taxed them 75%, leaving them with £8.05 billion to pocket.
From the remaining £24.15 billion Wastemonster gave Scotland just 20%...£5.030 billion and kept the remaining £18. 837 billion!
Not to worry, though.
SALVO intend dragging them through the ICJ, later this year, on charges of fraud!
The charges will go back to the very first barrel, when Wastemonster first began lying, saying no oil was being extracted, up to the point they admitted oil was was being drawn, but lied about how many barrels, until current days, when the truth and evidence emerged.
Scotland's resources, not England's or the UK's.
Scotland outright legally owns 95% of the North Sea oil and gas fields, regardless of Wastemonster trying to illegally shift boundaries.
Funnily enough, England owns the other 5% of the fields, just no drilling, other than exploratory, has ever taken place in their area.
Payment, all the way back to the 1960s...that's a lot of cash.
Throw in the renewable energy Scotland provides to the National Grid, which we receive no payment for and, indeed, even have to pay for, when we use it, well, Scotland is energy resource wealthy.
£billions upon billions, Micky.
I think Wastemonster will be in danger of declaring bankruptcy, as I don't see how they could ever repay what's owed.
Right now the UK economy is screwed with rising inflation, energy costs, food prices, etc and I can't see any change for the better in the next decade.
They could always refuse to pay, but the IMF would automatically remove their credit rating, (currently at AA-, while Scotland's sits at AAA) which means nobody would give them credit.
I suppose they could always sell off our shared assets; Bank of England, Houses of Parliament, House of Lords, Big Ben, Downing Street, Portcullis House, all of the museums, (more, but I can't recall them right now) various estates and plots of land, in fact 18% of London.
Moving further afield, there's close to 13,900 buildings alone, plus larger estates and plots of land, including MOD, plus anything and everything on them or under them, from nuclear attack subs to paperclips.
Of course, we have to take into account the 84 embassies, situated overseas.
I totted it all up, about a decade ago, where it came out at just under £14,000 billion.
Staggering, isn't it?
Scotland's 22% slice comes out at £3.080 thousand billion.
These are just quick calculations, covering a couple of areas.
This can a be checked out with the ONS, incidently.
The sums are probably much higher now, who can say, but that's where they stood a decade ago.
They biggest problem for us, in Scotland, is the deliberate lies and deceit, the fraud and constant corruption of Wastemonster and their msn cronies and that won't change.
The vast majority of Scots have no problem with the people of England.
Many of us have family and friends down there, but we really can't take Wastemonster any more, so we have to get out, before we get dragged down with their psychotic insanity.
The good folk of England get little choice in the matter, but we're about to use our Get Out Of Jail Free card.
As I said, I have reams of information, a of it verifiable and researchable.
Do yourself a favour, get you and your's up here, at the earliest opportunity, for a better quality of life.
Good things are going to happen. 👍
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Event 201
It can be found, here on utube, as one documentary (approx' run time around 50 mins or as shorter vids, labelled segments).
The blueprint was drawn up.
How to deal with a viral pandemic.
Everything was covered!
Medical, logistics, travel (or lack, thereof) communication, commerce, ie furlough payments, etc.
Everyone was agreed.
They did a dry run, a dress rehearsal, in 2019, computer simulated.
Our esteemed leaders managed to lose 65 million lives in the exercise!
They went back to the drawing board and revised the plan, putting in the finishing touches and it was a done deal.
Coincidence, that the real pandemic occurred just a couple of months later?
Coincidence, they didn't take the steps agreed, until too late?
The only coincidence, and a lucky one at that, was that 65 million people didn't die!
They ignored the blueprint and did the exact opposite.
They must have been so disappointed.
So much so that, upon examination, it can be found that the Omicron variant has strange characteristics that could only have been produced in a lab and is not a natural progression of the first variant.
Me, I've been following the fcuktardery developing over the last half a century.
I've watched it unfold to this over fifty years.
Nothing they do could surprise me and there are no depths to which they will not stoop.
1
-
@Daryl Foster
Not trying to be pedantic, Daryl, but it depends on the comorbidities.
Mine are emphysema and RA.
Had my immune systems not been the perpetrators of the RA I would still have refused the vax.
Why, with naturallly overactive systems, would I even dream of relying on a synthetic concoction that required governments around the world to provided blanket exemption for Big Pharma?
It made no sense, just as the virus and the response to it made no sense from the beginning.
My own experience, in regards to my acqaintences, are similar to Drew's.
Two, along with me, refused the vax and we're ticketyboo.
Of the others, all contracted the virus, four dying, but from heart and lung disease, where none were previously diagnosed, while another, having spent six weeks in an induced coma on a ventilator, is now permanently wheelchair-bound.
The issue will never be dealt with, because manufactured crisis after crisis while arise every time it seems that society is settling and the matter can finally be addressed, just as happened with all the illegal wars in recent decades, fictitious WMDs, missing trillions from public purses in various countries, similar sums in faulty or non existent PPE, et al.
The public, in general, sadly, really do possess a short attention span and this will prove no different.
1
-
1
-
1
-
What I cannot understand is the view that, once free of the Union, the Scots will cleave to the SNP, as if it would be the only political party in Scotland...in perpetuity.
Most Scots see the party as a means to an end.
Granted, they carry out the will of the majority of Scots voters, in pursuing a referendum, but that, in and of itself, has always been a major part of their manifesto.
Other policies are unpopular, however, are worth suffering for the outcome of dissolution of the UK to many.
Many mistakenly believe it is an obssession of just a political party, failing to see it as the wishes of, as I said earlier, the majority of Scots voters.
It stands to reason the party would be obliged to throw their hat in the ring, along with all the others, in a GE North of the border.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Your problem, Tony, is you see a political party and assume, without putting your brain into gear, that they represent everything about Scotland, when, in fact, the one deciding factor that determines they have and will continue to be returned in govt in Scotland is that they offer the most feasible likelihood of attaining the break up of the union, which is the desire of the majority of voters in Scotland, not because we're anti England, but because we're anti Wastemonster.
You compound your error by further assuming that once the union has been broken that the people of Scotland will automatically vote the SNP into govt.
Why?
The party will have achieved the will of the majority of Scottish voters and, that having been achieved, all bets are off and they will have to take their chances with all the other parties.
Not everyone in Scotland wants to return to the EU, for example.
Does that surprise you?
It's all very well the SNP saying it's a given and there will be no need for a vote on it, however, as I said, they will have to take their chances, because the Scottish Constitution clearly states that any govt voted into power is contracted only for as long as it is the will of the people.
In other words, they are on constant probation and can be removed at a moments notice, regardless of how long they imagined they'd be in office, to be replaced by a govt better suited to the wishes of the people.
Scotland, the country, is Sovereign.
Every man, woman and child are also Sovereigns/Lieges.
The govt is not.
The govt is subjugate to the people, who are the highest authority in the land.
The English monarchy is also subject to the will of the Scottish people and reigns on invite, not over Scotland, the land, but over the people, who, like the govt, can be given a P45, if that is the will of the people.
So, in short, not the Scottish govt, the English govt or the monarchy have the lawful right to dictate to the people of Scotland, who are the highest authority in Scotland.
We will decide who governs in Scotland and for how long!
That is how democracy works.
The people in England have the Magna Carta 1215, so could easily mirror Scotland to a degree, under Common Law, but few of the people are aware of the authority it gives them.
As is said: Knowledge is power.
1
-
@julian shepherd
England, owning only 5% of the oil and gas fields in the North Sea, outright, could survive for a short while on their own resources.
We could easily up our renewable electricity output from it's current 80% to 100% and, buying more of our excess, England could get by, as we could well afford to cover much more than the South East of England's electricity needs at a fraction of what the French are charging them.
Our own 95% of the oil and gas fields, which we don't need to use ourselves, could either be sold or left in situ, as an asset for gilts in a Scottish Central Bank.
The bank, itself, could quite easily be underpinned, using our portion of the shared assets, Holyrood included.
1
-
1
-
1