Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Secular Talk"
channel.
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Colony Three,
1. Shapiro has spoken in front of Congress, on many college campuses, is a major part of the Daily Wire, an actual website, has written many books and is well recognized. Kyle just has this little show.
2. Cenk was incorrect in an apology. There is no documented report of an apology. Shapiro pointed out studies for others to look into on the issue giving a counter viewpoint.
3. Shapiro is an intellectual. He graduated from Harvard law, has written many book, has spoken in front of Congress and is involved in many debates and discussions. If you feel Shapiro is not an intellectual then why do you feel that Kyle is?
Next, on the points you made, there are several examples of Hitler leaning left on issues that our current left wing does. Infrastructure spending for example and larger government to fix a recession. Many argued that the Great Depression created Hitler as he came along and used government to promise a better economy. It is highly debated amongst scholars on Hitler's views on Stalin. Shapiro has a point. Stalin was a fascist as well.
Yes, his wife being a doctor does influence his thoughts on healthcare as he does have a lot of resources to look into it, one of that is how insurance companies function.
4. I can provide a plethora of evidence. With healthcare Kyle has given the deceptive stat of how 45,000 die a year due to lack of access to healthcare. Many things wrong with that
A. As a Harvard professor pointed out, it is hard to get accurate numbers there as those individuals are poor to begin with and bad health is associated with poverty. There are higher rates of type II diabetes, smoking and obesity with the poor, all self inflicted. So the real question becomes do they die due to lack of access or due to being in bad health to begin with? With 45,000 people that is 0.01% of the overall population, a very minute number where minor changes can created large variances in the data. Kyle is presenting a vague number that needs clarification.
B. He makes that claim with zero comparison being done to other nations. So that number is meaningless unless it has a comparison
C. Kyle makes the claim that in other nations that number is zero. However, minor searches can show that is not true. Here are the title of two papers to read with their journals
"True versus reported waiting times for valvular aortic
stenosis surgery" Can J Cardiol. “
"Analysis of deaths while waiting for cardiac surgery among
29,293 consecutive patients in Ontario, Canada" Heart
And that is from Canada alone. Immediately he is incorrect. But he claims that there is not argument for a Medicare for all system when there clearly is. His only support is a poll that I can criticize very easily. Also, going on popularity is not an argument. It is saying that if a poll showed that slavery was popular we should allow it. Or if establishing religious based laws were popular we should allow it. Kyle is basing Medicare for all on polls and not actual data or economic discussions.
He claims there is no argument for raising the min. wage when many economists argue against it, and many argue against having one to begin with.
That is just scratching the surface.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6