Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Secular Talk"
channel.
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@EE-gv9wt wealth is not income. You have to be careful there. To start, many who are wealthy, like Bezos, have their wealth tied into the shares of their company. That is non-liquidated wealth, meaning they have limited access to it and can't just turn it into case. In fact, we covered this recently in one of my MBA courses, around 70% of stocks are non-liquidated and is owned by executives. So why they may have a lot of wealth, they have limited access to it.
Next, many people, like me, have negative wealth either in home loans or student loans. That is arguably not bad. It shows that we are willing to give out loans to people to make big purchases knowing the chances of them paying it off is high. I was given a lot of student loans in my 20s, a guy with no real job and low income. That says something about our nation when that can happen. I have negative wealth. However, I still have my own apartment, a car, 3 meals a day, etc. A homeless guy on the street has more wealth than me assuming they have no debt. So by your standard that homeless guy is better off than me.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Interdimensional Steve,
1. I don't agree with everything that Crowder does, but I feel you are misrepresenting him. To start, I see a contradiction in you saying he goes after "moronic children on college campuses". I hear all the time how the more educated one is the more liberal they are (a debatable issue but we will go with it). So if they are going to college are they liberal, educated and moronic? So you are admitting that being liberal is being moronic? Or maybe the idea of Bernie's "free college" would not make people smarter? What is it?
As for that "one time" a kid who many thought was well informed challenged him on his Change My Mind segment I disagree. To start, I felt Crowder's argument was poor, but that kid's argument was cliche. Saying "Sweden" and "Norway" is not an argument. And using the word "autistic" had him losing the debate. The kid seemed to repeat the same talking points he heard from Kyle on Secular Talk. Those countries are not socialist countries and socialism does not mean "government does thing". It was poor on both parts and the kid become perturbed and started to ridicule Crowder claiming that Crowder was losing the debate, he wasn't. Both sides were doing poorly.
2. Shapiro debated members of Congress in Congress and debate Cenk.
3. I don't follow Jordan Peterson so I cannot make a fair argument on him
4. You seem to know very little about Crowder and Shapiro. For one, going on college campuses does attract millenials which is what this video by Kyle is about. Next, as I said, Shapiro has debated members of Congress and both Crowder and Shapiro do more than just go after SJWs. You should watch their content. I have a feeling you haven't.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6