Comments by "Perry Douglas" (@PerryDouglas-v5h) on "Vox" channel.

  1. Two things you need to know. 1. The “Citizen” is the same thing as the “native born Citizen” with Limited Birthright, since July 4, 1776. This is not the “natural born Citizen” with Total and Complete Birthright, since July 4, 1776. Neither of these are the “naturalized Citizen” that came when naturalization began in 1790. 2. The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 declared indigenous persons born within the U.S. are “Citizens”. Also this is all ridiculous today, as most Native Americans today are also descendants of European ancestors, tens of millions of other Americans are descendants of the early indigenous inhabitants, only roughly 1.3 million full-blooded exist today, and even then only 90% is required to be considered full-blooded.
    1
  2. No amendment necessary. The true laws of the Constitution just need upheld. The 1898 decision needs treated like what it was and still is. Fraudulent!
    1
  3. The “Citizen” with no need of naturalization and Limited Birthright of Jus Soli, is not the same level as a natural born Citizen and never has been. They have no right to be Vice President and President!!!
    1
  4. Benny was denied being granted the natural born Citizen level of citizenship because the 14A “Citizen” and his not being born of citizen parents, were determined insufficient to treat him as one. The 14A “Citizen” is not the same level of citizenship as the Article II “natural born Citizen” and never has been in the U.S.A.. And I’m sure VOX will either have this deleted, or hidden because it is the truth.
    1
  5. VOX are not mentioning that the 14A “Citizen” are not a natural born Citizen. This is a critical detail!
    1
  6. @ I didn’t see a huge problem with it until the late 2000s and corruption that has lead to them fraudulently being treated as natural born Citizens eligible to our highest offices. And with this came the lie being created that those like Harris were born something they were not, and are something they are not.
    1
  7. @ Because of lies and corruption that occurred in the late 2000s, now even Xi Jinping could have a child here who is groomed to be President one day. Not legally, but all the liars in our federal government can’t argue with the lie they created in the 2000s, without exposing that they’ve been lying about a whole lot for 33 years now!
    1
  8. The historical record of the actual decision clearly shows he was denied being treated as a natural born Citizen, because he did not meet the criteria. I have a copy.
    1
  9. The historical record of the actual decision clearly shows he was denied being treated as a natural born Citizen, because he did not meet the criteria. I have a copy.
    1
  10. The Wong Kim Ark decision was made in violation of the Constitution’s true laws and the historical intent of the 14A. It was never legal to begin with. VOX are not being honest with you.
    1
  11. The Wong Kim Ark decision was made in violation of the Constitution’s true laws and the historical intent of the 14A. It was never legal to begin with. VOX are not being honest with you.
    1
  12. The decision of Wong Kim Ark clearly shows he was denied being treated as a natural born Citizen, because he did not meet the criteria.
    1
  13. The 14A “Citizens” and decades later Wong Kim Ark the “Citizen” in violation of the Constitution’s true laws and historical intent of the 14A out of claimed “humanitarian” reasons, were ONLY Granted being a “Citizen” with no need of naturalization and Limited Birthright of Jus Soli. None of them were granted the natural born Citizen level of citizenship! None of them ever could have been President or Vice President!!
    1
  14. Neither the 14A “Citizens”, or Wong Kim Ark the “Citizen”, were natural born Citizens. They did not have any birthright, Constitutional right, to our highest offices, that only the natural born do today and for a very long time now.
    1
  15. ⁠The phrase “subject to its jurisdiction” excludes children born of foreigners from its operations. Things were corrupted with Wong Kim Ark in 1898, of which the decision was never legal to begin with. Now if you ignore the fraudulent 1898 decision of Wong Kim Ark, you get this today! The “Citizen” (native born Citizen) with Limited Birthright can either be born in the country, or abroad, of at least one citizen required. The “natural born Citizen” with Total and Complete Birthright, must be born in the country, of parents who are citizens. Both! Then this! The original U.S. Constitution and 12A require one are a natural born Citizen to be eligible for the offices of President and Vice President.
    1
  16. Birthright citizenship is old as the U.S.A. is. American citizenship began with the adoption of the Constitution in 1788, and was deemed to retroactively date back to the founding of the nation on July 4, 1776. This is all before naturalization began in 1790.
    1
  17. ⁠The phrase “subject to its jurisdiction” excludes children born of foreigners from its operations. Things were corrupted with Wong Kim Ark in 1898, of which the decision was never legal to begin with. Now if you ignore the fraudulent 1898 decision of Wong Kim Ark, you get this today! The “Citizen” (native born Citizen) with Limited Birthright can either be born in the country, or abroad, of at least one citizen required. The “natural born Citizen” with Total and Complete Birthright, must be born in the country, of parents who are citizens. Both! Then this! The original U.S. Constitution and 12A require one are a natural born Citizen to be eligible for the offices of President and Vice President.
    1
  18. Seriously, get our of your own heads and read this! Sorry, but learn something real for once!!! The 14A “Citizen” is the same level of citizenship that George Washington and all the earliest “Citizens” of the nation, who were not born of citizens, were granted upon adoption of the Constitution in 1788. Then what’s below is extremely important, because you are being lied to! Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution in part states: “No Person except a Natural Born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President,” 12A holds the VP to the same requirement! The Citizen do not have birthright to our highest offices! Not for a very, very long time now!!!
    1
  19. Seriously, get our of your own heads and read this! Sorry, but learn something real for once!!! The 14A “Citizen” is the same level of citizenship that George Washington and all the earliest “Citizens” of the nation, who were not born of citizens, were granted upon adoption of the Constitution in 1788. Then what’s below is extremely important, because you are being lied to! Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution in part states: “No Person except a Natural Born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President,” 12A holds the VP to the same requirement! The Citizen do not have birthright to our highest offices! Not for a very, very long time now!!!
    1
  20.  @StepsOfStPhilips  Seriously, get our of your own heads and read this! Sorry, but learn something real for once!!! The 14A “Citizen” is the same level of citizenship that George Washington and all the earliest “Citizens” of the nation, who were not born of citizens, were granted upon adoption of the Constitution in 1788. Then what’s below is extremely important, because you are being lied to! Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution in part states: “No Person except a Natural Born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President,” 12A holds the VP to the same requirement! The Citizen do not have birthright to our highest offices! Not for a very, very long time now!!!
    1
  21.  @StepsOfStPhilips A Citizen do NOT have birthright to our highest offices, at all! The last one who did was William Henry Harrison, in 1841!!!
    1
  22. George Washington wouldn’t be eligible to be President and Vice President today, and the 14A “Citizens” never were! VOX aren’t mentioning that we have two different levels of native citizenship, each with different levels of birthright. Since July 4, 1776!
    1
  23. Article II clearly states the “Citizen” were only eligible to be President, if one at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. 12A holds the VP to the same requirement. VOX aren’t being honest with you!
    1
  24.  @5280BLM Ignore the 1898 decision of Wong Kim Ark and you get this today! The “Citizen” (native born Citizen) with Limited Birthright can either be born in the country, or abroad, of at least one citizen required. The “natural born Citizen” with Total and Complete Birthright, must be born in the country, of parents who are citizens. Both!
    1
  25. @ Article II of the original Constitution and the 12A makes it clear that the “Citizen” have no right to be President and Vice President today. But VOX are leading you to believe they do.
    1
  26. 14A 👉 “subject to its jurisdiction” excludes children born of foreigners from its operations. Even if in the country legally. This was all corrupted in the 1898 decision made by the Supreme Court of California. That was and still is fraudulent!
    1
  27. It doesn’t make one a “Citizen” even if the parents are legally in the country. That’s not what the 14th Amendment did at all! And the 1898 decision was never legal to begin with. So guess what? Read the first sentence again!
    1
  28. It doesn’t make one a “Citizen” even if the parents are legally in the country. That’s not what the 14th Amendment did at all! And the 1898 decision was never legal to begin with. So guess what? Read the first sentence again!
    1
  29. Children of foreigners in general, are excluded from the operations of the 14A. VOX and this platform are suppressing much absolutely verifiable information. Without quotation marks, the phrase subject to its jurisdiction excludes children born of foreigners from the 14A. Why? Because it was only for the freed slaves!
    1
  30. The 14A “Citizen” is the same level of citizenship that George Washington was granted upon adoption of the Constitution in 1788. This level no longer have birthright to our highest offices, according to, the original U.S. Constitution and 12A. William Henry Harrison was the last “Citizen” to legitimately occupy those offices. In 1841!
    1
  31.  @dantechang8556 George Washington was a “Citizen”. Do you think he would be eligible to be President today? Have you ever actually read the Constitution and learned to understand it?
    1
  32. I have a copy of the decision of Ark. It is very clear he was denied being treated as a natural born Citizen. Did not meet the criteria. Of being born of citizen parents.
    1
  33. I have a copy of the decision of Ark. It is very clear he was denied being treated as a natural born Citizen. Did not meet the criteria. Of being born of citizen parents.
    1
  34.  @dantechang8556  From July 4, 1776 and until after the 1898 decision, no one was granted citizenship as a “Citizen” with no need of naturalization and Limited Birthright through Jus Soli, EXCEPT for on three (3) special occasions. The earliest “Citizens” of the nation upon adoption of the Constitution in 1788 and pre-1790 naturalization, mostly native born residents of the soil, who were not born of citizen parents. The 14A “Citizens”, mostly native born residents of the soil, who were not born of citizen parents. The individual involved in the 1898 decision, a native born resident of the soil, who was not born of citizen parents. Yes George Washington was the same level of citizenship as the 14A “Citizen”, and the “Citizen” the individual involved in the 1898 decision was. Let’s stop playing games here!!!
    1
  35.  @dantechang8556  Strictly Jus Soli is Limited Birthright. This is not Total and Complete Birthright through both Jus Soli and Jus Sanguinis that only the natural born Citizen are born with. Benny obviously did not inherit Jus Sanguinis! Not through two Chinese citizens he didn’t! He was no more a natural born Citizen than George Washington was. Not at all!!!
    1
  36.  @dantechang8556  I’ve left 6 comments and only 4 total are showing on the entire thread. How convenient!
    1
  37. According to VOX’s false claims, George Washington would be eligible to be President and Vice President today. Except this doesn’t add up! Why? Because the Constitution states the “Citizen” were only eligible if one at the time of the adoption of the Constitution!!!
    1
  38.  @DMurdock  The act has been prohibited from the Constitution since the convention in 1787. Only the act of naturalization was given inclusion within the Constitution. Our constitutional naturalization policy was replaced by unconstitutional immigration policy in 1882, under the mustache man in my profile pic. Today most citizens are under the impression that immigration is constitutional, and that foreigners have some right to come here to live and be permanent residents, and everything else here. Yet this has never been true!
    1
  39. The 14A “Citizen” and the Article II “natural born Citizen” are not the same thing. They were never eligible to be in our highest offices.
    1
  40. @ 👆 I know everything about so-called Obama!
    1
  41. @ Only 3 people in both offices since William Henry Harrison in 1841, were not born of American citizens. 2 weren’t born of an American citizen at all. The 1st of these 3 was born British in Canada!
    1
  42. @ There was a fraudulent decision made in late 2009. VOX aren’t mentioning this!
    1
  43. Fraudulent decision made in late 2009. VOX aren’t mentioning it.
    1
  44.  @Themias7  Article II clearly states the “Citizen” were only eligible if one at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. That was in 1788.
    1
  45. Women didn’t have independent citizenship in the U.S.A. until 1922. At the time of the 14A, unmarried women were the nationality of their father, married women were the nationality of their husband through the legal doctrine of coverture. So if the father and mother were married, both parents of the child were considered citizens.
    1
  46. This was law in 18th and 19th Century America. Women did not have independent citizenship until 1922. Regardless of whether only the father was a citizen, or if both parents were citizens by marriage, the child was born the nationality of their father. Keep in mind here that the earliest “Citizens” of the nation since July 4, 1776, the 14A “Citizens”, and the individual granted being a “Citizen” in 1898, were retroactively granted citizenship some time after their births. These people were not born citizens at the time of their births.
    1
  47. The 14A “Citizen” is not a natural born Citizen. It is absolutely impossible KDH was born one!!!
    1
  48. ⁠The phrase “subject to its jurisdiction” excludes children born of foreigners from its operations. Things were corrupted with Wong Kim Ark in 1898, of which the decision was never legal to begin with. Now if you ignore the fraudulent 1898 decision of Wong Kim Ark, you get this today! The “Citizen” (native born Citizen) with Limited Birthright can either be born in the country, or abroad, of at least one citizen required. The “natural born Citizen” with Total and Complete Birthright, must be born in the country, of parents who are citizens. Both! Then this! The original U.S. Constitution and 12A require one are a natural born Citizen to be eligible for the offices of President and Vice President.
    1
  49. Here’s all the details that aren’t being mentioned here! At the time of the 14A, that was historically only for freed slaves, everyone else was still held to our preexisting requirements, laws regarding our two (2) levels of native citizenship, with different levels of birthright! Keep these things in mind throughout all of this. At the time U.S. law was children were born the nationality of their father and subject to the jurisdiction of their father’s country. It did not matter if they were born in the U.S.A., they weren’t eligible for American citizenship at all just by being born here. At least the father had to be an American citizen for the child to be born an American citizen at all. Also women did not have independent citizenship until 1922. Unmarried women were the nationality of their father, while married women were the nationality of their husband. These are the two levels of native citizenship and the requirements, criteria surrounding them at the time of the amendment! For everyone else except the freed slaves the 14A was for! The “Citizen” (aka native born Citizen) with Limited Birthright required being born of at least a citizen father, whether in the country, or abroad. The “natural born Citizen” with Total and Complete birthright requires one being born in the country, of parents who are citizens. The United States of America is “the country”. The child must be born in specifically a state. This means the father must have been an American citizen and married to the mother, for both parents to be citizens. At the time! Then when women gained independent citizenship in 1922, it became both parents must be independent citizens!!
    1
  50. Then there’s of us who are descended from first-born sons of the nation, indentured servants, enslaved whites in the British colonies and early America, and Native Americans. I know I’m not alone in this. And oh well, it’s not a good excuse for others to do the same to us. If it hadn’t have been Europeans, it would have been someone else sooner, or later. Like all the annoying pests from Asian nations today, who try and use the past here as an excuse to do the same to us.
    1