Comments by "Perry Douglas" (@PerryDouglas-v5h) on "Vox" channel.

  1. @ Ankeny v. Governor (2009) could not have reaffirmed that any child born within our borders are a natural born Citizen, regardless of the citizenship of the parents. Because the 1898 decision did not grant him being any more than a “Citizen” with no needs of naturalization and limited birthright through Jus Soli.
    1
  2. @ Ankeny v. Governor. McCain and Obama were directly involved. And I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Harris and Newsom were DA and Mayor of San Francisco in 2009, where the 1898 decision historically occurred.
    1
  3.  @NWstockoperator  To make a long story short, Ankeny v. Governor (2009) created a lie about Wong Kim Ark (1898). Anyway, I left a few comments, as I’m receiving much interference these days.
    1
  4. @ I do have a copy of the 1898 court decision. My information comes from the most reliable source. It is the same record I read during grade school in the 1980s. In the Ohio state Board of Education’s criteria!
    1
  5. @ I’ll give you an example. If I simply remove the 1898 decision, that was in violation of the Constitution’s true laws and historical intent of the 14A to begin with, this is what we get today and after all other changes in our laws since. The “Citizen” with Limited Birthright through Jus Soli, also known as the “native born Citizen”, must be born of at least one citizen, but can be born in the country, or abroad. Today this can be the mother, or the father, if not both, and they can be a Citizen, natural born Citizen, or naturalized Citizen. The Article II “natural born Citizen” with Total and Complete Birthright of Jus Soli, and Jus Sanguinis, that can only be inherited by being born of parents who are, must be born in the country, the country being the states, and of parents who are citizens. They can be a Citizen, natural born Citizen, or naturalized Citizen, just so long as both are citizens. The naturalized Citizen is obviously someone who is naturalized as an American naturalized Citizen.
    1
  6. @ The framers of the Constitution took the “natural-born” Citizen from Emmerich de Vattel’s “The Law of Nations” (1758). Natural law. We are defined as a child born in the country of parents who are citizens. The Law of Nations is mentioned in the Constitution. Why born of parents who are citizens? So that we are born within sole allegiance to the People and our nation of the U.S.A. in the process, have no ties to any foreign nations and are free of any foreign influence.
    1
  7. @ Vattel’s Law of Nations is mentioned in the Constitution! They used Jus Soli based on English common law for the “Citizen”. They used Vattel’s natural law of The Law of Nations for the “natural-born” Citizen.
    1
  8. @ More important details. Most of the earliest “Citizens” or “native born Citizens”, including ancestors of mine, were born in the later dissolved British colonies that became part of the U.S.A. and considered themselves to be born British subjects. They were native born residents of the soil. Not immigrants. They did not come from a foreign country to be permanent residents in another. Now think of this in comparison to the 14A “Citizens”. They were mostly native born residents of the soil, previously held in captivity and denied rights and citizenship. Not immigrants. Then Benny in 1898. A native born resident of the soil, denied rights and being a citizen until the decision. A “native born Citizen”, aka “Citizen”.
    1
  9. @ It’s really this easy! The “Citizen” in the 14A is the same level as the “Citizen” in Article II. And this is not the same as the “natural born Citizen” in Article II. Meaning no the 14A “Citizen” is not the Article II “natural born Citizen”.
    1
  10. @ The Civil Rights Act of 1866, the full history of the 14A, the Slaughter-House Cases, Minor v. Happersett, Elk v. Wilkins. All of this is very important to understanding the big picture of what really occurred with the 1898 decision. Now what happened, is in 2009 in Ankeny v. Governor, that McCain and Obama were directly involved in, the lie was created that Benny was granted being a natural born Citizen! Yes this actually happened in 2009. Over a century after the decision. I’m sure they thought no one would notice!!! 👀
    1
  11. @ This is a part of my heritage. I am a 9th generation natural born Citizen. A Son of the American Revolution. Ancestors were amongst the earliest “Citizens” and “natural born Citizens” of the nation and pre-1790 naturalization. Upon adoption of the Constitution, all who were born in the country since July 4, 1776, of people considered to be “Citizens” since July 4, 1776, were considered to be a natural born Citizen. Born in the country, of citizen parents. It is important to note that women did not have independent citizenship until 1922. At the time, unmarried women were the nationality of their father. While married women took on the identity of their husband through coverture. So it required the father and mother being married, for both to be considered citizens , making the child born of citizen parents and a natural born Citizen. This is all before naturalization began in 1790! One such as James C. Calhoun was, as well as Martin Van Buren. Calhoun was the first to be a Vice President. Van Buren was the first to be a President. While everyone else from William Henry Harrison and back to Washington, were only granted being a “Citizen”, also known as the “native born Citizen”.
    1
  12. @ By the way, I learned all this grade school in the 1980s. For free! Thanks to the Ohio state Board of Education. And yet there’s Harvard “scholars” who have a horrible understanding of how things went down from July 4, 1776 and up to that decision in 1899. Or maybe they’re just lying! 🙄
    1
  13. Trump isn’t trying to fix anything. His bunch are just trying to change the lie to make the claim any child born of legal permanent residents, including green card recipients, are born a “natural born Citizen” eligible to be President and Vice President, because 4 of his kids aren’t natural born Citizens and aren’t eligible. Meanwhile people like so-called “Obama” and “Harris”, and many others, are getting away with what are massive crimes against the American people and the country.
    1
  14. You need to know what occurred from the time of the 14A in 1868 and up to that British guy in my profile pic stole the office of President by force in 1881. American blacks were on the path to better things, then Great Britain overthrew the U.S.A. in 1881, and threw a wrench in the whole works in favor of foreign opportunists stealing the country. I’m sure the people at VOX are descendants of those who stole the country!
    1
  15. You need to know what occurred from the time of the 14A in 1868 and up to that British guy in my profile pic stole the office of President by force in 1881. American blacks were on the path to better things, then Great Britain overthrew the U.S.A. in 1881, and threw a wrench in the whole works in favor of foreign opportunists stealing the country.
    1
  16. By the time of the 14A it was the 40th Congress, and no there was nothing about America being exclusively for white men. Times changed! So many lies circulate today that most have no idea what true American history is, and VOX definitely aren’t truth speakers.
    1
  17. Warner Bros. Discovery own 25% of VOX. Trusting these people is a real bad idea!!!
    1
  18.  @jatsko3113 Lots of my comments have been made invisible to the general public here! But they’re still visible to me.
    1
  19.  @jatsko3113 Details! At the time of the 14A, that was historically only for freed slaves, everyone else was still held to our preexisting requirements, laws regarding our two (2) levels of native citizenship, with different level of birthright! Keep these things in mind throughout all of this. At the time U.S. law was children were born the nationality of their father and subject to the jurisdiction of their father’s country. It did not matter if they were born in the U.S.A., they weren’t eligible for American citizenship at all just by being born here, at the time of, or after the amendment. At least the father had to be an American citizen for the child to be born an American citizen at all. Also women did not have independent citizenship until 1922. Unmarried women were the nationality of their father, while married women were the nationality of their husband. These are the two levels of native citizenship and the requirements, criteria surrounding them at the time of the amendment! For everyone else except the freed slaves the 14A was for! The “Citizen” (aka native born Citizen) with Limited Birthright required being born of at least a citizen father, whether in the country, or abroad. The “natural born Citizen” with Total and Complete birthright requires one being born in the country, of parents who are citizens. The United States of America is “the country”. The child must be born in specifically a state. This means the father must have been an American citizen and married to the mother, for both parents to be citizens. At the time! Then when women gained independent citizenship in 1922, it became both parents must be independent citizens!! Now why are these critical details? It’s because the U.S. Constitution requires one are a “natural born Citizen” to be President and Vice President! While VOX are lying that we only have one level of native citizenship and birthright!!!
    1
  20.  @jatsko3113 I gave you two replies! One was deleted!!! About two dozen of my comments aren’t being seen by anyone! What, do you seriously think V here are being honest with you? Because they’re not!
    1
  21.  @jatsko3113 The 14A “Citizen” is the same level of citizenship that George Washington was! Which is absolutely not a natural born Citizen!!! And yet we have V here implying there is only one level of native citizenship, and one level of birthright!?
    1
  22.  @jatsko3113 The 14A “Citizen” is the same level of citizenship that George Washington was. The “Citizen” is also referred to as, and known as, the “native born Citizen” in our history!!!
    1
  23.  @jatsko3113 ​​⁠The 14A “Citizen” is the same level of citizenship that George Washington was. The “Citizen” is also referred to as, and known as, the “native born Citizen” in our history!!!
    1
  24.  @jatsko3113 I really doubt anyone at VOX are a 50 year old 9th generation American natural born Citizen. Ancestors of mine were amongst the earliest “Citizens” and “natural born Citizens” of the nation, pre-1790 naturalization. Granted such upon adoption of the Constitution in 1788, retroactively dating back to the founding of the nation on July 4, 1776. Before naturalization began in 1790!!!
    1
  25.  @jatsko3113  5 new replies to you. I’m sure you can’t see them!
    1
  26. This is bigger and more dangerous than you know. Since 2009, any child born within our our borders of anyone, have been being fraudulently treated as a natural born Citizen eligible to our highest offices. Even retroactively with one such as the now former VP.
    1
  27. The 14A “Citizens” and decades later Wong Kim Ark the “Citizen” in violation of the Constitution’s true laws and historical intent of the 14A out of claimed “humanitarian” reasons, were ONLY Granted being a “Citizen” with no need of naturalization and Limited Birthright of Jus Soli. None of them were granted the natural born Citizen level of citizenship! None of them ever could have been President or Vice President!!
    1
  28. It is impossible Kamala was born a natural born Citizen. The 14A “Citizen” is NOT a natural born Citizen!
    1
  29. It is impossible Kamala was born a natural born Citizen. The 14A “Citizen” is NOT a natural born Citizen!
    1
  30. This is bigger and more dangerous than you know. Since 2009, any child born within our our borders of anyone, have been being fraudulently treated as a natural born Citizen eligible to our highest offices. Even retroactively with one such as the now former VP.
    1
  31. @ You have what the amendment was historically for and what it actually did, mixed up with what corruption of it caused by the fraudulent 1898 decision opened the door to. No the amendment did not mean anyone born in the country could be a “Citizen”. It was only for the freed slaves. Children born of foreigners were excluded from its operations, it was only for the freed slaves, no one else. Then it was corrupted by the 1898 decision. The true laws of the Constitution, and the historical intent of the amendment were violated out of claimed “humanitarian” reasons, rather than throw Wong Kim Ark out. Which would have upheld our true laws.
    1
  32. @ The historical records of its legislation are very clear as to what was meant by it too, and I’m absolutely positive you’ve never studied the full history surrounding it, because you’re assuming it did something that only corruption of it 30 years later opened the door to. It means what its authors are on record as having stated it means. Of course VOX’s spin on it is nothing supported by what’s within the actual historical records.
    1
  33. @ The 14A was in 1868. The fraudulent decision of Wong Kim Ark was in 1898. The Supreme Court of California completely ignored that children of foreigners are excluded from the operations of the 14A.
    1
  34. Article II clearly states the “Citizen” were only eligible to be President, if one at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. 12A holds the VP to the same requirement. VOX aren’t being honest with you!
    1
  35. According to VOX’s claims, George Washington would be eligible to be President and Vice President today. Except this doesn’t add up! Why? Because the Constitution states the “Citizen” were only eligible if one at the time of the adoption of the Constitution!!!
    1
  36. @ I’m not sure if you should be trusting the man. Whatever happened to him exposing people with issues related to this subject, like JM, BO, TC, MR, KH, NH, TG. And why has he never said a word about VR.
    1
  37.  @kennethkho7165  A fraudulent decision was made in late 2009. People by the initial of JM and BO were directly involved. The case title is unmentionable here without facing auto-deletion.
    1
  38. @ Look into the Natural-born Citizen Act of 2004. Things have been severely corrupted this past 20 years. They got much worse in 2008! These people were not born what they claim!!!
    1
  39. @ VOX are implying we only have one level of native citizenship and birthright. This isn’t true since the founding of the nation on July 4, 1776. In all technicalities citizenship began with the adoption of the Constitution in 1788, and pre-1790 naturalization, but it was considered to retroactively date back to July 4, 1776. The “Citizen” (aka native born Citizen) with Limited Birthright, and the “natural born Citizen” with Total and Complete Birthright.
    1
  40. @ It is not a coincidence that controversy has surrounded McCain, Obama and Harris’ certificates. And no one ever saw one with John at all! I’m trying to tell you, bad stuff went down in the 2000s!
    1
  41. @ He never had one because children born in Panama could only be a “Citizen”, even if born of two citizens. This is NOT a natural born Citizen!
    1
  42. @ Nothing actually legal and valid since 1795 has ever changed that the requirements to be born a natural born Citizen, are the child must be born in the United States of America, the country, which are only the States, and of parents who are citizens. NOTHING actually legal and valid has changed this since 1795! And it was only allowed from 1790-1795 that they could be born abroad, if born of citizen parents.
    1
  43. @ There would have to be a Constitutional amendment which allows for “Citizens” to be eligible to our highest offices, or for anyone born in the country to be a “natural born Citizen”. This is out of the Supreme Court’s hands and in the hands of Congress, who obviously have made no amendment of any kind.
    1
  44. @ A child born of only one citizen in the country, or abroad of at least one citizen, can only be a “Citizen” with no need of naturalization and limited birthright of Jus Soli. The natural born Citizen must be born in the country, the country being specifically a state, of parents who are citizens. The 14A did not alter these requirements for everyone else! It was for the freed slaves!!!
    1
  45. VOX are lying! The Citizen DO NOT have birthright to our highest offices. The Citizen were only eligible if one at the time of the adoption of the Constitution!!!
    1
  46. VOX are lying! The Citizen DO NOT have birthright to our highest offices. The Citizen were only eligible if one at the time of the adoption of the Constitution!!!
    1
  47.  @minutemansam3122 The Citizens is not a natural born Citizen. The Citizens DO NOT have birthright to our highest offices. The Citizen WERE only eligible if one at the adoption of the Constitution. This IS IN THE CONSTITUTION!!!
    1
  48.  @kennethkho7165 George Washington was a “Citizen”. He wouldn’t be eligible to be President today. He wasn’t a natural born Citizen!
    1
  49. @ VOX are not being honest with you. They are ignoring that we have two different levels of native citizenship, with different levels of birthright. They are pushing lies created in the 2000s.
    1
  50. @ The 14A “Citizens” and Wong Kim Ark the “Citizen” never could have been President and Vice President. Very important and critical details regarding American birthright citizenship are being left out here.
    1