Comments by "Mark H" (@markh1011) on "VICE TV" channel.

  1.  @surroundedbyidiots2778  It's hardly surprising at all. The evidence that a large jet hit the pentagon makes it undeniable however.
    1
  2.  @jason8952  "What evidence, Mark? " Passenger DNA matched with families. Passenger personal effects identified by families. The FDR. Image from the security footage with a shape that fits a large plane. Light poles knocked down on the way into the impact. Plane wreckage photographed. over 100 witnesses who saw a plane hit the pentagon.... But you're all confused about the plane going into the building so apparently there is no evidence... 🤦‍♂ You can even find a photo of part of an engine. You're hopeless.
    1
  3.  @DrunkedMunk  Show me where the government said that.
    1
  4.  @jamestee8852  "Because it was a missile same as Pennsylvania" Plenty of evidence that a large plane hit the pentagon. Zero evidence that a missile hit the pentagon.
    1
  5.  @surroundedbyidiots2778  "you’re a poster boy for your good old crooked government." I'm not even American. " But after researching the governments track record in past history, they have 0 credibility." So because governments lie that makes all the conspiracies true? So the earth is flat too huh? "Maybe one day your eyes will open up." Yep that's what the flat earthers tell me. You appear to be no different.
    1
  6.  @surroundedbyidiots2778  So I raise facts you don't like and you accuse me of being American. I point out that I'm not and you say I'm waving a patriotic flag. Can you do better than these poor responses? I don't think you can.
    1
  7.  @surroundedbyidiots2778  I have referenced many facts in this thread. You have no response. You cannot defend your conspiracy. All you can do is evade and make silly claims about my nationality. Hopeless.
    1
  8.  @mobiledutycodmr.9256  No. Here is what happened. Some time before 9/11 there was an audit done, as happens regularly. But some of the finances couldn't be accounted for. This was due to records not being available, different systems, old systems etc. Within 6 months of 9/11 most of it was reconciled. End of story. Nothing to do with 9/11 or the pentagon crash. The US has had ongoing problems reconciling military spending.
    1
  9.  @mobiledutycodmr.9256  "some 2.8 trillion there are either idiots running our country or they are in on it " As with most governments its mostly the former.
    1
  10.  @mobiledutycodmr.9256  "right he just announced it the day before stop" ...and within 6 months of that announcement more than half of it was reconciled. Similar problems have happened in the years following. It has nothing to do with 9/11.
    1
  11. "Well ... on the hierarchy of scientific disciplines, the structural engineers were beneath us physicists - that's me." You're not a physicist. I've had to explain basic physics concepts to you. "You cannot have an in-tact, smaller and weaker block pulverizing its way down to the bottom of these massive and stable structures. " You don't understand the progressive collapse. The collapses started with 15-20 floors falling into one weakened floor then you have 21 floors falling onto the next then 22 falling into the next and so forth. Halfway through the collapse you have half the building smashing the floors below it. You don't even understand the basic mechanics of the progressive collapse. "You cannot have an in-tact, smaller and weaker block pulverizing its way down to the bottom of these massive and stable structures. " WRONG. Structural engineers learn that the strength of building materials doesn't scale proportionally with size. So it's not to simple to just build a little representative model of the towers to test the collapse behavior. ". But it could not, because Bazant's "theory" is so absolutely and absurdly ridiculous" As demonstrated, you don't even understand it. " even the boys at NIST under the crack of the government whip could not support that moronic absurdity." NISTs findings were entirely consistent with Bazants and others who performed analysis. Seffen, Zhou, Greening etc.
    1
  12. " Just like when NIST modeled sections of the floors and blasted them with temperatures beyond anything that could have possibly been achieved from the available fuels" Prove it. Support your claim. Go on. "No fudging any experiment or model on any scale could support Bazant's ridiculous thesis." Prove their was fudgling.
    1
  13. "Bazant is either a moron," It just becomes comedy when someone like you says that and you don't even understand his analysis. 😂😂
    1
  14. Debunked again.
    1
  15. Oh and are you actually trying to present yourself off as a physicist? You don't understand basic physics. Why are so many conspiracy theorists dishonest?
    1
  16.  @lebergerdesphotons4565  Weak insults because you can't address the argument.
    1
  17.  @lebergerdesphotons4565  Wow you copy pasted a quote. That will really make up for the lack of an argument. ...
    1
  18. "Anyone who has any discernment knows 9-11 was an inside job. T" Can you prove this?
    1
  19. "The whole thing was AN INSIDE JOB!" It's been over 20 years and still no evidence to support that claim.
    1
  20. You're referring to Jamie McIntyre who was just trying to make the point that the plane went into the building. He said later on about attempts to quote mine him - “Having been there on September 11th, having seen the plane wreckage and photographed it myself personally, I can tell you that’s nonsense…Click here for sound clip I had a camera with me, I took pictures of some of the wreckage, some of the parts of the fuselage of …a part of the cockpit, until they told us we had to move back away from the scene…” Conspiracy theorists are dishonest.
    1
  21. "USAF pilot interviewed THAT DAY described shooting down the plane." Where is your evidence for this? " A farmer was interviewed THAT DAY and described seeing the plane shot down by USAF" Evidence please. " A farmer was interviewed THAT DAY and described seeing the plane shot down by USAF" It was 80 something and the contents were made known at the Moussaoui trial. Only 2 (next to each other) were pointed at a section of wall. "Read April Gallop's testimony. " she has nothing of interest to say about it. " Jet engines weigh 7-8 tons EACH. Where are they?" They went in the pentagon. You can find a photo of part of one.
    1
  22.  @christopherh2336  "everyone knows it was a missile" Zero evidence for that. "There is zero plane wreckage" It takes 20 seconds to do a search and find photos of plane wreckage at the pentagon.
    1
  23. Actually, every WTC building collapsed or partially collapsed as did some other surrounding buildings.
    1
  24.  @kurtcameron723 Judy Wood's theories are even worse than the absurd demolition claims.
    1
  25. "No planes could have cut through the MASSIVE STEEL construction of the World Trade Towers. " So I guess you don't understand physics huh? " explain how a Hollow tube of aluminum that a bird hit can take out cut into tbe Towers like a cartoon, " Think about that. At high speed even something as light and soft as a bird can do serious damage. Now consider the damage from planes that weigh over 100 tons. "The big nose of these planes is made of plastic." So what? The nose didn't do the damage. "A field energy weapon disintegrated these buildings," That's a science fiction fairy tale. "Where is the rubble?" The pile that took over 6 months to clean up.....
    1
  26. "everyone interviewed said they heard something like a missile, or saw missiles in the air as well as fighter jets over and near Shanksville, PA." Who said this? "I witnessed another airplane crash and the debris and impact crater" Was that an intentional crash at high speed?
    1
  27. With a few minutes of searching you could have found a picture of part of an engine at the pentagon. There is plenty of evidence that it was flight 77. There is zero evidence that it was a missile.
    1
  28.  @jeremiahjohnson6082  "You MUST be one of those that actually believe the single bullet theory of JFK" I'm not interested in your subject changes. "In Shanksville, I saw no wreckage from a plan" People who were there did. I guess you know better than the first responders huh? With 20 seconds of searching you can find pictures that have wreckage in it. Look up the crashes of PSA Flight 1771, UA 585 and Ethiopian Airlines flight 302. They have similarities to the Shanksville crash.
    1
  29.  @kevinbrown1893  ":Obviously, if you had known anything about high school level physics then this would come as no surprise." Actually, if you knew anything about high school physics you wouldn't be so surprised that fire can cause a building to totally collapse. "must have been quickly reprimanded by our government as " 🤦‍♂ "BBC reported that day that WTC 7 had already collapsed before it had actually collapsed!" There various incorrect reports that day. That was just one of them. It's not hard to see how they got that wrong considering the fire department thought it was going to collapse long before it did.
    1
  30. You contributed another post full of errors and ignorance. I pointed out your errors. You got mad, ran away and complained about me. You " I wonder if that's a coincidence or a conspiracy." Yeah man I'm totally reading your mind.
    1
  31.  @lebergerdesphotons4565  You're still throwing a tantrum about me because you can't address my arguments.
    1
  32.  @lebergerdesphotons4565  Again - more tantrums because you cannot address the arguments.
    1
  33.  @lebergerdesphotons4565  " Maybe if you can explain the 8 second seismic signatures" Already done so. 1. They were longer than 8 seconds. Look at the seismic data. 2. You can't determine collapse times from seismic data because you don't get a disturbance at the point where the collapse starts, and you don't get a clean end of disturbance when the collapse ends. Explained. Can you refute this? Of course not.
    1
  34.  @lebergerdesphotons4565  " and the lack of wingtip vortex then" Oh and I missed this. 5 Factors That Affect The Strength Of Wingtip Vortices "1) Aircraft Speed As the velocity of an aircraft increases, the strength of the vortices is typically reduced. That's because flying faster typically requires a lower angle-of-attack. It's also why takeoff and landing are critical times to pay attention to the flight path of large aircraft around you, because they're going relatively slow and creating large vortices."
    1
  35.  @lebergerdesphotons4565  ”So you got it right and Judy Wood got it wrong?” Judy Wood seems to get everything wrong. I’m going straight from the seismic data. You are denying it. ”She's been working successfully as an engineer.” A weak appeal to authority. Her qualifications don’t change the data.
    1
  36.  @lebergerdesphotons4565  “So you're saying that a 110 story building falls to the ground and that can't be cleanly differentiated from the moments before and after when no such event was occurring?” You’re not getting it. You never do. The seismic data doesn’t start to record anything until the collapse is so destructive that creates a disturbance. This may even be when the first debris hits the ground. Is that the beginning of the collapse? This isn’t hard to understand. ”how about her comparison with the seismic data from the kingdome.” Blown up with explosives. The explosives caused the collapse and would have registered the disturbance straight away. Again – this isn’t hard to understand.
    1
  37.  @lebergerdesphotons4565  " leaves the need to explain why they fell down. " The explanation has been given over and over. Do I need to sit you down like a little child and explain it to you again?
    1
  38.  @lebergerdesphotons4565  "Was it the "airplane" which entered the building entirely disappearing without decelerating or deforming? " 🤦‍♂ 1. They came to a stop in the building. So they decelerated. Basic physics You don't know basic physics 2. They would have been torn apart in the collisions. ..hence the explosions. Sigh. These are such basic errors....
    1
  39. "were not COMMERCIAL airliners but dark colored SILENT missiles Do you have a vision problem? "also came down as the results of well placed bombs" Why do you need bombs if you're firing missiles? " which caused the steel beams to TURN INTO DUST in mid air ." That didn't happen... but either way, bombs and missiles don't do that. Nothing you say makes sense or reflects reality.
    1
  40. Silverstein was rich before 9/11. He spent a fortune on legal bills and renting an empty site. He was paid less than what it cost to rebuild. The idea that 9/11 was an insurance scam is absurd.
    1
  41.  @twistedbunny  If that's all you could come up with as a response then no you can't debate me.
    1
  42.  @twistedbunny  So still nothing....? Did my post confuse you? How about this... you bring some evidence to support claims that the government did it. Or keep dodging... buddy.
    1
  43.  @twistedbunny  "The problem with you if you're asking for evidence is that you hope for me to pull out the whole "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" argument " I recommend you don't try to guess what I'm going to say..... " there's more than one resource containing any information you might want that shows that the government did it " I'm waiting to hear your evidence. " They staged the gulf of tonkin " So that proves 9/11 was done by the government? Logic isn't your thing. That's like me pointing to a terrorist attack from Al Qaeda, such as the USS Cole Bombing or the foiled Bojinka plot as evidence for them doing 9/11. You have to do better than that buddy.
    1
  44.  @twistedbunny  " I'm not here to change your mind" You were challenged to provide evidence and I'm seeing a lot of excuses. "They later released only five frames of the incident but from their Southside security checkpoint and you couldn't see any plane whatsoever " You're being disingenuous. You can see a object that fits the size of a plane. It's blurry but it's definitely there. " and even a hint of anything from the sky hitting Pentagon was non existent." Oh dear. Let's have a quick look at some of the evidence... Passenger DNA matched with families. Passenger personal effects identified by families. The FDR. Image from the security footage with a shape that fits a large plane. Light poles knocked down on the way into the impact. Plane wreckage photographed. over 100 witnesses who saw a plane hit the pentagon.... Yeah... non-existent...🙄
    1
  45.  @twistedbunny  "I could go on with the infamous" With a list of claims that were debunked 15 years ago...? Do go on. "by the BBC," Just one of the errors from the day. It's not hard to see how the error was made considering that the FDNY were the ones who predicted it would collapse because it looked so unstable. The idea that a national media company from the UK were involved and reading from a script is absurd as the whole insurance scam idea. What was the pentagon crash for then? Flight 93? Just part of the insurance scam? It makes no sense. "The list is endless, a" It's so endless that you can't seem to come up with anything of substance.... 🙄 "go read the documents Assange published" You're supposed to be bringing evidence. All I've seen so far is excuses, old debunked claims and requests for me to do the work for you.
    1
  46.  @twistedbunny  I'm scanning your post.... excuses... whining... excuses... You realise you're out of your depth and you're panicking. Your weak claims were dismantled in front of you and now you're fleeing. But like most people on the internet with a fragile ego.. you're going to throw some playground insults while you run away and hide. Well this has clearly been an awkward lesson for you kid. Get back to me when you're capable of defending anything you say.
    1
  47.  @twistedbunny  I'm scanning your post.... excuses... whining... excuses... You realise you're out of your depth and you're panicking. Your weak claims were dismantled in front of you and now you're fleeing. But like most people on the internet with a fragile ego.. you're going to throw some playground insults while you run away and hide.
    1
  48.  @twistedbunny  I'm scanning your post.... excuses... whining... excuses...
    1
  49.  @twistedbunny  You realise you're out of your depth and you're panicking. Your weak claims were dismantled in front of you and now you're fleeing. But like most people on the internet with a fragile ego.. you're going to throw some playground insults while you run away and hide.
    1
  50.  @twistedbunny  You realise you're out of your depth and you're panicking. Your weak claims were dismantled in front of you and now you're fleeing.
    1