Comments by "Mark H" (@markh1011) on "VICE TV" channel.

  1.  @twistedbunny  But like most people on the internet with a fragile ego.. you're going to throw some playground insults while you run away... Well this has clearly been an awkward lesson for you. Get back to me when you're capable of defending anything you say.
    1
  2.  @twistedbunny  Get back to me when you're capable of defending anything you say.
    1
  3.  @twistedbunny  Well this has clearly been an awkward lesson for you kid.
    1
  4.  @twistedbunny  "Old man, the juice isn't always worth the squeeze," Kid you're putting so much effort into your excuses... it's hilarious. You apparently can't be bothered... it's too hard... or something but then you write out a page of whining and whimpering excuses..
    1
  5.  @twistedbunny  You've obviously got no idea. Just go kiddo... don't hang around trying to recover some dignity... that's only making it worse.
    1
  6.  @twistedbunny  See my comment about hanging around trying to recover your dignity.... lol
    1
  7.  @twistedbunny  " getting your diGNiTy off of stupidly arguing with teenagers" Dignity off? What are you even babbling about child? You've been schooled and you're falling apart.... lol
    1
  8.  @twistedbunny  " "lack of credible arguments" made you orgasm " Dude... weird.
    1
  9.  @twistedbunny  "I'm worried if you actually have a family, poor kids" I must have really struck a nerve with the humiliating lesson. You're desperate to get back at me.
    1
  10.  @twistedbunny  " I'm stress free typing this out" Your obsession with getting back at me for schooling shows otherwise. Every response now shows otherwise. 😂
    1
  11.  @twistedbunny  "I'm trolling you at this point," 🤣🤣 Proving my point. It must have really cut you to get schooled like that.
    1
  12. That's nonsense. Show some evidence for that. How would that even make sense? If Bush was behind it, why would he talk to kids about it?
    1
  13.  @timshea4279  "Maybe the kids were in on it? " 😂😂
    1
  14.  @wiwalk6611  "Fuel physically can not melt steal." Irrelevant. The jet fuel only started the fires. The steel weakened, it didn't melt.
    1
  15.  @wiwalk6611  ".the buildings where designed to with stand plane strikes and earthquakes" Leslie Robertson clarified that they considered a slow flying 707 and did not consider all the follow on effects of the jet fuel. Oh and you won't know who he was of course, but he was one of the people who designed the towers.
    1
  16.  @wiwalk6611  "go and google image bird strikes on planes and look at damage to plane" You're destroying your own position. If a little fragile, light bird can do damage to a plane then an object weighing over 100 tons can get through some steel columns.
    1
  17.  @wiwalk6611  "then you have biulding 7. Come down co trolled demolition. No planes hit?" It was hit by part of a skyscraper and burned away all day. The fire department thought it looked unstable and would collapse. They were right. The end.
    1
  18.  @wiwalk6611  ...oh and you didn't respond to my post... .you just ran to new claims.... that's what conspiracy theorists do... because they can't ever support their claims.
    1
  19.  @wiwalk6611  Yep.... a slow flying 707. Was that it? Was that all you had as a response? 🤦‍♂
    1
  20.  @wiwalk6611  Hasn't this been an awkward lesson for you lol
    1
  21.  @wiwalk6611  "they where designed to with stand plane strikes." I have already addressed your confusion here. Also, they did actually withstand the strikes. "The buildings where not structurally weakened by the planes or fires." We know for a fact that the fires were weakening the structure. We have photos showing the gradual weakening.
    1
  22.  @wiwalk6611  That's all you've got? You don't know anything about this topic do you sport?
    1
  23.  @wiwalk6611  "ow wow you think your intelligent." You're moaning like a petulant child. You've got nothing. Take your lesson and go play with your toys.
    1
  24.  @wiwalk6611  Get back to me when you've got something kid.
    1
  25.  @wiwalk6611  Hopeless. 🤦‍♂
    1
  26. " Sadly we probably will never know the truth" It's been known for a long time. But reality can be boring for some people and like they mysterious conspiracies more.
    1
  27.  @bazzledust2912  The details of 9/11 are quite well established, from the Hamburg cell to the events of the actual day....including the collapse of the towers.
    1
  28. There is zero evidence to support that claim. It also makes no sense at all.
    1
  29.  @kurtcameron723  Prove it.
    1
  30.  @seanhorgan76  "and yet on the 11th the pentagon gets hit exactly where the paper trail of said money was at" This is pure fantasy. Within 6 months of 9/11 more than half the spending was reconciled. Nothing to do with the pentagon. But hey feel free to provide the evidence that supports your claim.
    1
  31. It was unaccounted for as part of an audit. Different aging systems across various organisations. The usual challenges. Within 6 months of 9/11 more than half of it was reconciled. The US has had the same sort of ongoing problems tracking and reporting military spending for years. The whole thing has nothing to do with 9/11. The plane did not the "the financial department". You don't make all the money disappear off all the records by hitting an office with a plane. Everything is backed up. It's all nonsense.
    1
  32. "Raging fires in skyscrapers never caused a collapse. " Except for then they have, such as the Wilton Paes de Almeida Building and Plasco Buildings. Oh and they were not hit intiontally by 767s.
    1
  33. "YET NO PLANE PARTS WERE FOUND." You can find photos of the plane parts with 30 seconds of searching.... "EVEN THE CHIEF OF FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO was THERE AT THE Scene SAID IT ON LIVE TV. HE LITERALLY SAID THERE ARE NO PLANE PARTS HERE" Nope. That never happened. If you're trying to refer to someone called Jamie Mcintire, he was deceptively quote mined. " IT LOOKED LIKE A MISSILE STRIKE" Missiles don't leave holes like that, they explode. There is no evidence for a missile hitting thempentagon.
    1
  34. Sigh... Most of the plane went into the pentagon but you can still see wreckage. Most of 93 went straight into the dirt but you can still see wreckage. Generally in plane crashes the pilots are trying not to kill themselves and everyone else. If you look at the crashes of PSA Flight 1771, UA 585 and Ethiopian Airlines flight 302, there are similarities to the 9/11 crashes.
    1
  35.  @timshea4279  I didn't know that. That's very interesting. One report I just read said he also tried to sue Bin Laden?
    1
  36. Insurance against terrorism was not uncommon. If you were renting a building that was the target of a terrorist attack a few years earlier it would be wise to insure against it. It was insured against terrorism when it was attacked then as well. The supposed dancing Israelis were released with no evidence that they knew anything.
    1
  37. Within 6 months of 9/11 more than half of it was accounted for. The story has nothing to do with 9/11.
    1
  38. Sigh.... so much wrong... The passport was never in the fires. It was ejected in the crash. The jet fuel didn't cause the high temps, it only started the fires. The steel didn't melt, it weakened.
    1
  39.  @hassanbabu6200  "where was the one passport ejected to" It was found on the sidewalk before any of the collapses. It was handed to the police. An airline seat cushion was also found on the sidewalk. "explain to me how the whole building just vertically collapsed floors by floors from the top." Seriously? You don't know what happened so I have to teach you? Do you know anything about this topic?
    1
  40.  @hassanbabu6200  I do know very well. Have you done any research on this topic at all? Have you watched videos of the top down collapse? Look up what a progressive collapse is.
    1
  41.  @hassanbabu6200  Did you look up what a progressive collapse is?
    1
  42. ​ @Hobojet  "Larry Silverstein admitted the building was "pulled" demo term" That's not what he said at all. Post what he really said. " Demo experts were asked not knowing what building 7 was if it was controlled demo said it was clear." Nope. One guy said it. They had to go to the other side of the world to find a demo guy to say it. ...and that same guy said the towers collapsed was NOT a demo. So do you agree with him?
    1
  43.  @epoen2012  "Bush sent the bin laden family out of the country via plane right after" According to snopes the claim is false.
    1
  44. "What commercial airliner in black or charcoal grey? " If you'd bothered to do a few minutes of research you'd see that United Airlines Flight 175 was dark grey. Flight 11 was grey underneath.
    1
  45. That's total nonsense.
    1
  46. "econdly where's the video and witnesses of the Pentagon so called strike??" Over 100 witnesses are on record describing a plane hitting the pentagon. "And lastly" when has anyone seen aluminum cut through steel so perfectly?" Oh do you don't know about physics.....
    1
  47. "The fact that BOTH terrorists attacks on the WTC were successful in that they both reached their target(s) makes you wonder!" 3/4 made it to their destination. So is that suspicious or expected? " Not to mention the millions of other inconsistencies! " Yeah there are a lot of debunked claims.....
    1
  48.  @frederickjohnpicarello1909  "You mean like building 7 falling at freefall fn speed in its own footprin" You mean free fall acceleration. ...and no the whole building didn't fall at free fall overall. The closest you get to that was part of the building, some walls, in virtual free fall towards the end of the collapse. So you are wrong.
    1
  49.  @frederickjohnpicarello1909  "Don Rumsfeld announce the day b4 9/10 that 2.3 TRILLION! " Sigh... no. Some time before 9/11 there was an audit done, as happens regularly. But some of the finances couldn't be accounted for. This was due to records not being available, different systems, old systems etc. Within 6 months of 9/11 most of it was reconciled. End of story. Nothing to do with 9/11 or the pentagon crash. No..that part of the pentagon wasn't an accounting section nor were records kept only in one place... So you are wrong there too.
    1
  50.  @frederickjohnpicarello1909  "Which one of those facts were debunked?" Both. Neither was a "fact" as you stated them. Try again smart guy.
    1