Comments by "Rutvik" (@rutvikrs) on "ThePrint" channel.

  1. 10
  2. 10
  3. 10
  4. 10
  5. 10
  6. 10
  7. 10
  8. 10
  9. 10
  10. 10
  11. 10
  12. 10
  13. 10
  14. 9
  15. 9
  16. 9
  17. 9
  18. 9
  19. 9
  20. 9
  21. 9
  22. 9
  23. 9
  24. 9
  25. 9
  26. 9
  27. 9
  28. 9
  29. 9
  30. 9
  31. 9
  32. 9
  33. 9
  34. 9
  35.  @stalinsampras  let me quantify: 1. The problem with Congress is they have "earners" if you catch my drift. People like DK Shi and Sharief hold away in the party even more than before due to the financial position of the party. 2. I have met Siddu on several occasions as my family lives close to Varuna and he is a sophisticated bumpkin. He has great read first world ideals but little in the way to achieve them. His anti superstition laws while good on paper is used by missionaries and is a considerable cause of resentment to his own community outside of his district(ask a kuruba in Kollegal) His idpol is also a problem even for his own party members. He permanently paved the way for BJP with his Tipu divas shenanigans. 3. JD(S) has no clue about running things in Bengaluru let alone North Karnataka. They are a two agenda party, one is increasing sugarcane price in Mandya and second is real estate for the family. 4. AAP is filled with three type of people, activists who want govt deals later, idealistic working professionals who have no connection to an average voter and senior citizens with too much time raring to go at corruption. Everyone is a good Samaritan there but it's an NGO at best. 5. BJP has two kinds of people, RSS functionaries and party hoppers. Party hoppers are corrupt as hell but they have all the voter pull. What gives me hope about BJP is their ability to consume the voter bases of these party hoppers and neutralise them. Remember Janardhan Reddy of Ballari? If this was Congress he'd have bought his way to Bengaluru bt now. Instead he is a local force, bjp eats his money and his vote base keeps shifting to the party instead of him. I support BJP because they have done considerably well on infra, state finances and HDI metrics seen in NFHS-5. It's not something I am happy with but as I said best out of a lot of crooks.
    9
  36. 9
  37. 9
  38. 9
  39.  @kaustubhshukla6462  1. The legal case is sound. Check out Apurva Mandhani's video or better, the article on print that SG referred to. She has covered it in detail on why the SC asked the government to take the call. 2. I reiterate that I don't support the morality of the situation, objective assessment is not an approval. Realpolitik rules the world regardless of whether we want it to. 3. You and I see them as monsters by the crimes they committed. That is not how a local sees them. They are seen, quite perversely as avengers. These communities would see this person not as a rapist but someone who can deliver justice where the law can't. A woman in this network would feel completely comfortable approaching them. I find it incredulous that people live such sheltered lives that they don't know this actually happens on the streets around them. It's not a jibe on you, but the shoddy understanding of our own societies. Look at how this reflects in movies, even in the progressive southern movie industry. The hero who beats up the eve teasing villain is also an eve teaser in a different scene. They are not being honoured for the crime they committed but for "serving their time despite being the retaliator"(not my view, that is how they are seen). 4. We need not be lawyers to discuss this case. We don't have to go back very far when the right wing was raging about the acquittal of Nirbhaya's Juvenile convict. BJP raging that AAP gifted him a sewing machine and the NGO efforts that relocated him to South India anonymously. Regardless of our qualification we, at the very least seek to understand the principle and at most seek to change it.
    9
  40. 9
  41. 9
  42. 9
  43. 9
  44. 8
  45. 8
  46. 8
  47. 8
  48. 8
  49. 8
  50. 8