Comments by "Taint ABird" (@taintabird23) on "BBC News"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Halotest100
The Irish are the UKs masters now, certainly in relation to the EU.
The Irish have shaped your Brexit to a point where you are all now pretending you never wanted a deal in the first place. Too funny. When the UK comes looking for a trade deal it will be the Irish you will have to suck up to, in order to ensure you get a good deal. Ireland will be in your corner, but will not tolerate any perfidy.
Once there is a deal the Irish can live with, Dublin will give the nod to the US Congress not to block any trade deal between the US and the UK. The US will be your other master, dictating the terms of any trade agreement as the UK will be a rule take, a vassal used to Make America Great Again. Your foreign policy will continue to be determined by the US State Department, and it appears you have already surrendered selection of your Ambassador to the US to President himself.
This will give you all more time to pick your own fruit and other hard work. It will be hard, as the English are the least productive workforce in the entire OECD.
By the way, Ireland joined the Euro freely, and the Germans ceased approving the Irish budget in 2012. Ireland has its own Refugee Policy which it implements and it takes in relatively few refugees.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@superdan8286 Some observations:
There are about 200 nations in the world as I understand it, and you correctly point out that many of those countries are poor, indicating that they are unlikely to be customers for the UKs high-end products - which limits the UKs opportunities with them. But most other countries are, including these poor ones, creating trade blocs or are strengthening existing ones with their neighbours. Countries trade more with their neighbours because it adds value to our exports - the further you have to send your stuff, the more expensive it is to send it, the lower your profits. In that light, pure economics, Brexit makes no sense.
You say that a country should sink or swim by its own merits; I would say countries, especially small ones, live or die by the quality of their strategic thinking, especially in relation to the tyranny of geography. In that respect, the UK is a small country now, off the coast of the EU, and against a much larger bloc that will continue to be an influence on British decision making without the UK having a chance to shape that influence; China, the emerging superpower, and the USA, the existing superpower, are both rich and have much larger economies. Both of these will expect the UK to be rule takers in any formal economic relationship and you will have to sacrifice some sovereignty in order increase British prosperity in the future. In that light too, the obsession with sovereignty makes no sense.
The remainers are defeated, they were routed in the 2019 General Election. They are an irrelevance now. Still, there seems to be a tendency among Brexiters to hold them accountable for the EU not begging for a deal or whatever. I'm not sure what they really expected. In any case, I would be concerned as to where the blame for the unrealised expectations of Brexit is being placed, because unlike you, they really believed that the EU would fall at the UKs every demand in order to get any kind of a deal, because they liked the idea of the UK being that important.
I'm not British, but I have been really struck by how Brexit has exposed pre-existing fault-lines in UK society. One example is that it seems to have energised Scottish nationalists once again and I think there are English people too that want England to leave the UK. Do you think the break up of the UK is now inevitable? Will we see an independent England in the coming years?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1