Comments by "Alexey 9" (@Fillipok) on "Good Times Bad Times" channel.

  1.  @bratbrata4974  Not true. We do not want to fight, but when the life and future of our country is at stake, we will fight for our future. I am ready to lay down my life if only our country is peaceful, united and prosperous. Tough times call for tough decisions. The collapse of the USSR had a catastrophic effect on the life of Russians. I will not allow this scenario to repeat itself.
    1
  2.  @kaladore6798  ага, главное свою страну не потеряйте в попытках нас развалить :) если взять слишком большой груз, то можно и надорваться :)
    1
  3.  @Alex-ck5pz  Ukraine also lost hundreds of soldiers in the same way, but in addition, it also lost Soledar. Such assaults bring heavy losses to both sides. The Wagners used a clever strategy: they sent one detachment to attack from one side of Soledar to create the illusion of a full-scale offensive in that direction with a surprise offensive from the other side. After that, they went around Soledar from the weakened flanks, where the Ukrainians did not expect a blow. This allowed them to surround Soledar and the Ukrainians were forced to surrender. Why is this not a smart strategy?
    1
  4. It's great that you write comments like this. The more people in Russia realize that the West wants to trample them down, destroy them, turn their lives into hell, the more Russians will understand that there is no turning back and that they must fight to the end. No one in their right mind would want their nation to be humiliated for decades. It leaves terrible scars on the country. Suffice it to recall Germany after the First World War, which everyone mocked, and how it ended for the world community. The Germans became angry at the whole world and started the Second World War. The Russians are unlikely to want such a fate, so they must fight to the end. The humiliation of Russia and Russians can only cause Russian hatred of the West. Keep up the good work and you will succeed.
    1
  5.  @a_tomtor  А ты уверен, что россиянам дадут снова выбрать сильного лидера? Они прекрасно учли опыт СССР и теперь сделают все, чтобы Россия никогда не воссоединилась.
    1
  6.  @a_tomtor  Надо понимать, что их элиты интересуют в первую очередь их страны, их благосостояние, их процветание. На нас им откровенно говоря наплевать, как и на кучу других стран по всему миру.
    1
  7. ​ @a_tomtor  В этом и есть главная проблема происходящего. Не удивлюсь, есть часть наших элиток будет готова поделить повторить развал СССР, но уже в России, чтобы запад их простил и дал им дальше пилить деньги в России. Люди, конечно, будут страдать, но они будут богатеть, распрадавая остатки России.
    1
  8. Я так понял ты хочешь, чтобы русские больше не существовали?) Такого будущего ты им желаешь, раз ты желаешь, чтобы американцы решали судьбу России) Арестович уже продвигает идеи, что нужно лишить Россию ядерного оружия и поделить страну на части) Ты хочешь смерти русских, замечательно)
    1
  9.  @LibertarianLiberall  Алло, чудик, ты прямо говоришь, что мы должны американцам дать право решать нашу судьбу. Ты прямо говоришь, что они должны решать, жить нам или нет. Ты желаешь, чтобы все мы умерли. Никакой заботой о русских ты не можешь прикрываться. Ты желаешь смерти всем русским, чтобы украинцам было хорошо. Никакие свои бредни про "пыню" не неси. Ты для меня враг. Если ты желаешь развязать гражданскую войну, то вперед. Будем воевать на улицах. Помнишь 1917 год? Хочешь его повторения, давай.
    1
  10.  @jcym9058  Hmmm, since when did the Russians, who wish their people death, humiliation and misfortune to their people, become intelligent? He directly proposes to give the right to people who want to kill and kill Russians to decide our fate. This cannot be called intelligence, this is a direct betrayal of their people. If you are ready to wish death and misfortune to your people, so that it would be easier for other people, then you are an enemy, and not some kind of intelligentsia.
    1
  11.  @letmedoit8095  If we fail to protect Russia, then we will all die. What difference does it make how many tanks we lose if Russia were gone otherwise. When our great-grandfathers fought Nazi Germany, they did not think about the lost tanks. They thought about how to protect our country from enemies who want us dead. Here is a completely similar case.
    1
  12.  @jcym9058  The invasion of Ukraine is a response to NATO's military expansion into Ukraine to create an existential threat to Russia's existence. The Americans are using Europe to fight Russia and we are responding to it. Your rulers want to seize control of Russia and are using Ukraine to do so. NATO is preparing to destroy Russia and in the next 10 years there will be one of the biggest wars since the Second World War. Enjoy and die for the interests of the Americans. Even before the start of the special military operation, we said that you need to give us security guarantees that NATO would not attack Russia. You refused. Think why. NATO's military budget is about a trillion dollars, so we don't want you on our border. But since you want to devour us, we will fight. However, the capture of Russia will not be an easy task for you, so we will still fight before our surrender to the Americans.
    1
  13.  @stariyczedun  Ууууух, смешишь. Германия сохранила свое нынешнее состояние, потому что так решили победители. В случае России мы окружены двумя крупными силами: Китаем и блоком американцев. Для них мы интересно исключительно с точки зрения ресурсов. И они любым способом попытаются забрать как много больше. Они до этого не сильно хотели наращивать экономическое производство, а теперь подавно. Рассмотрим сценарий поражения. Начинается гражданская война, аналогичная гражданской 1917 года с миллионами жертв и так далее. Потом появляется Навальный, который зовет на помощь НАТО. У нас по стране будут бегать солдаты НАТО и их не будут интересовать жизнь русских жителей. Их будут интересовать задачи по взятию важнейших объектов под свой контроль. С другой стороны войдет Китай тоже под предлогом помощи России. И они будут делить нашу страну, чтобы как можно больше всего забрать себе. Слабые страны, неспособные себя защитить, поглощаются сильными. Это уже неоднократно показывала история и покажет в очередной раз, если мы провалимся. Только этот раз Россия может уже не пережить, как было в 1917 и 1990, тут мы можем уже не встать вновь, сил просто не будет для этого. Тогда Россия станет очередной историей в прошлом. Какая-то часть нашей страны превратится в руины, часть уйдет соседним странам. Миллионы убитых, беженцев и так далее.
    1
  14. In general, the result of this war will be that Russia will become completely dependent on China. Russia and Ukraine will become participants in the proxy war between China and the United States... A wonderful ending to our countries... We are turning from subjects into objects of politics. I hope that China will not be too cruel to us. The Slavs are fighting for the glory of America and China. Wonderful. Unfortunately, Russia cannot cope alone against the Anglo-Saxons.
    1
  15. When the United States stops interfering in Russia's affairs and constantly interfering with Russia, then we will stop thinking about the Americans.
    1
  16. There is another opinion. The meat grinder near Bakhmut is needed to deprive Ukraine of the opportunity to prepare reserves for the offensive. This was openly stated by the head of the PMC Wagner.
    1
  17.  @kameraldbahrul3432  Strangely, he votes for the decolonization of Russia, but at the same time supports the revival of the Polish Empire. Here is the oddity.
    1
  18. Yes, for the Poles it sounds good... It's a pity that the opinion of the Russians doesn't bother you at all... But these are trifles, the main thing is that you like everything.
    1
  19. I agree, I hope that people's opinion will be decisive. And as a resident of the Urals, my desire to live in a united Russia will be taken into account. Otherwise, I will have to take up arms to achieve this.
    1
  20. Disintegration without war is hardly possible. As residents of the Urals, I am ready to fight for a united Russia against the separatists.
    1
  21. ​ @eisbergsyndrom5010  I disagree with your argument that Moscow is taking all of Russia's wealth. Moscow lives best of all due to the fact that it provides the best conditions for workers. This leads to the fact that all the best minds of the country come to Moscow. Highly qualified specialists and hardworking people create the economy of Moscow. As a resident of the Urals, I am offended that the best schoolchildren from Yekaterinburg are leaving for Moscow. This is problem. It seems that we need to change the upbringing of children so that they want to develop their own region. Artificial division of the country into parts will not solve the problem of migration to Moscow. People from the regions will also leave for Moscow. And I'm afraid that they will leave not only for Moscow, but also for other countries (as has already happened in Ukraine). It does not bode well for the future of the Russians. I still do not take into account the possible scenario of China and the West intervening in this process. If the US or China tries to take over the regions of Russia, the situation will become catastrophic. And given the past 30 years, there is no doubt that both the United States and China will try to do this. The United States constantly interferes in the affairs of foreign countries under the pretext of fighting for democracy. In the event of the collapse of Russia, no one will let the Russians decide their fate. Summing up, your proposals sound like destroy everything and hope that all problems will be solved, there will be peace and everything will be fine. History shows that such things usually do not end well.
    1
  22. Do not interfere in the internal affairs of Russia.
    1
  23. In general, as a Russian, I am not opposed to Russia being an empire, but today Russia has nothing to do with an empire.
    1
  24.  @norbertlipusz3892  There have been few volunteers in Ukraine for a long time and mobilization has been going on for a long time. Now it will simply be even more difficult to avoid mobilization.
    1
  25. Um, you live far from reality. In reality, the Russians will decide little. Given the lack of power in Russia, two superpowers: China and the United States will try to get as much of Russia under their influence. To do this, they will try to get as many loyal elites as possible who will be ready to submit to China and the United States. Then they will build local states that will work for the benefit of the Chinese and American economies. Sorry, but this scenario has little to do with democracy and human rights. Democracy outside the EU and US is a fairy tale to justify their imperialist conquests. It's just that now the methods of capture have changed. New methods of capturing countries have appeared: economic, informational, and so on.
    1
  26.  @ArtisZ  In fact, Erdogan is not a friend to the Russians. Turkey simply benefits from cooperation with Russia: a large flow of tourists, the creation of a gas hub, a grain deal, and so on. Cooperation with Russia greatly strengthens Turkey. A sensible leader would not sever these ties with Russia because that would cause serious harm to the country. Therefore, I doubt that Russia cares about who will become the next president of Turkey.
    1
  27. Have you forgotten about the Russian people? As a resident of the Urals, if necessary, I am ready to fight for the preservation of a united Russia. How will wars against separatism make the lives of ordinary people better?
    1
  28.  @sogerc1  Well, if I die for the future of Russia, then I will not regret it. The main thing is that Russia should be preserved after me and the future generation should flourish in it.
    1
  29. I hope that if the collapse of Russia happens, then we will thank you with nuclear missiles for your help. With love from Russia. :goodvibes:🥰 I see no point in a world without Russians. And if you lead us to this, you will have to pay the price for it. Fortunately, we have the means to make you pay for the suffering that you bring to us.
    1
  30. Um, the Russian Empire was one of the largest states in the world. It is enough to look at how the Russian Empire expanded and expanded over the centuries. This does not fit into your theory that Russia has suffered defeat after defeat. The collapse of the Russian Empire occurred due to internal conflicts against the background of the First World War, in which Russia fought on the side of France and Great Britain. Your sources are very strange, as they contradict common sense ... Russia remains the largest state, even retaining only part of its lands after the decolonial policy of the USSR...
    1
  31. Look, the final goal of the West in relation to Russia is to get a dozen small states, the elites of which will be completely controlled by the West. I think the West will have no reason to impose on a bunch of loyal states controlled by the US and working for the benefit of the US. Your arguments sound the most illogical. The US is not going to build truly independent states on the territory of Russia. They don't need it. Otherwise, these states can take control of China. The United States, of course, can limit the interaction between countries so that they do not again unite into one country, but they will not limit cooperation to the detriment of the United States.
    1
  32. Ahah, my friend, you apparently do not know anything about the history of Abkhazia. The protests there began back in the 90s, when Russia had a billion problems and we didn’t care about Georgia. ;)
    1
  33.  @RabbitShirak  Who said that these small states will be controlled by China? In the event of Russia's defeat, the West plans to turn the former Russia into a bunch of puppet pro-Western states that will work in the interests of the West. China, instead of a reliable and important ally, may receive hostile states. This sounds illogical. With the same success, the United States could take over Germany. This is absurd. It is necessary to capture hostile states. Russia is essentially now working for the Chinese economy. Your argument about the global economy is very strange.
    1
  34. Yeah, creating puppet states that will work for the benefit of the US and China will give people more freedom (no). We have seen the collapse of countries many times and nothing good for the inhabitants has ever ended. Sometimes people's lives just got worse, but sometimes it led to the worst civil wars. You can rejoice that there will be no more Russia, but there's no need to carry nonsense about the benefit for common people. Especially when you have little understanding of what will happen and whether the people of the country want it. Yes, and we remember it in our history. 1917, 1991 are the darkest years in the history of Russia. I would not wish such suffering even on the most terrible enemy.
    1
  35. The West wants to get pro-Western states in place of Russia, which will be completely subordinate to them. Then nuclear weapons will not be a big problem for them.
    1
  36. Is any war a genocide? Can I then call the US wars in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria and other countries a genocide? The Americans did not spare anyone there. Millions of civilians died there.
    1
  37. It's terrible how much propaganda affects you. You can already see Putin's hand everywhere. It would be better to watch how the West interferes in the affairs of foreign countries under the guise of fighting for democracy. Oh, I forgot, they are good, they can. 🤣😂🤣😂
    1
  38.  @stuff1044  And why does he only shoot videos about Russia? Why not make a video about what will happen to the USA (or France, Poland, Germany, etc) if the country falls apart?
    1
  39.  @lukasgza9655  Why do you decide for the inhabitants of Chechnya and Dagestan that it will be better for them? Do you think you are gods? Divide your countries into parts, and do not meddle in the internal affairs of Russia. You behave exactly like your Western leadership. We ourselves will figure out how to live. Take better care of yourself.
    1
  40.  @moonasha  Listen, buddy, why do you decide who the Russians should support and who they shouldn't? We do not tell you how your country should live, who you need to support and who you do not need. Russians will figure out what is right and what is wrong without you. You seem to take over from your authorities the desire to interfere in the affairs of foreign countries. Better worry about what your American authorities are doing. Your American authorities are also doing a lot of bad things, but we do not pester you on the Internet with calls to overthrow your government and make you feel guilty. So you respect our right to choose our own future without the interference of your authorities.
    1
  41. Hmm, our soldiers are unlikely to die from the cold. If the Ministry of Defense fails to provide them, then ordinary people will gather everything our soldiers need. But there are signs that the government is starting to come to its senses and are trying to solve existing problems. I have a mobilized friend in the Crimea and he received new equipment and weapons(He already regrets that he bought all the equipment in advance :) He has many military friends and some of them are not very lucky. Some were given old and tattered uniforms made in the 90s. The government is urgently trying to arrange the production of everything necessary, but it takes time). Of course, little time is given for preparation before being transferred to Kherson, but still the Syrian instructors are trying to help them. This gives hope that the problems will be solved step by step. Yet our government wants to continue to govern the country and avoid the fate of Gaddafi. But it remains unclear whether they will have time to do all this before critical losses.
    1
  42. I hope that before the collapse of Russia, we will launch missiles at the UK, the US and our dear Polish friend. If there are no Russians in this world, then why do we need this world. 🐅🐅🐅
    1
  43. So he did not say what would happen on the territory of Russia. But you are right, such a disintegration will lead to a terrible civil war.
    1
  44. Yes, yes, yes, toilets are a very expensive and valuable thing. Our soldiers evacuate them first xD. And if without jokes, then my mobilized friend left Kherson on November 10 without any problems. Many soldiers were surprised by this decision. Some believe that the authorities sold Kherson to the Americans.
    1
  45. Are you kidding?) Turning Russia into small colonies of the West, from which all sorts of resources will then be pumped out, is in the interests of russians? You will also try to organize a bunch of civil wars like the Chechen one. Yeah, this is definitely in the interests of Russia. It is better to divide the United States into a bunch of small countries, small decolonizations. Russia has already paid a big price for the collapse of the USSR, and now you want to finish us off completely. The main thing is that you do not hide your goals to destroy Russia and the Russian people. And it gives us the motivation to fight to the end. Otherwise, we will get Syria or Libya on a large scale, in which you built democracy in exactly the same way. You have intervened in a large number of countries under the pretext of building democracy and you want to do exactly the same scenario with Russia. You are only interested in Russian natural resources, and you don't give a damn about our people.
    1
  46.  @ZamraHh-y3t  And who should I trust? I would rather trust my authorities, even if they are imperfect, than the NATO countries, which are ready to bomb anyone for their own interests. Over the past 30 years, I have seen enough of how you build democracy. I don't want you to make a second Syria out of us and then just siphon all the resources out of us. You unleashed a civil war in Syria, supporting the opposition with weapons, launched terrorists there, divided the country into parts, then placed your military bases near oil fields and are now pumping out all the resources from there. That's what your vaunted democracy is worth. I would like you to feel for yourself what your democracy is worth. It's a pity that this is not possible today.
    1
  47. ​ @ZamraHh-y3t  Assad cannot produce oil in his own country, which he controls. This is just hilarious. Why do you decide for the Syrians who has the right to rule their land? You are the damn occupiers. I don't like their ruler, so we're occupying the land. We, NATO, are a defensive alliance, but if we do not like some ruler, then we will bomb their land and occupy it. Why is Russia afraid? We're just protecting ourselves. The dictator in Syria threatened the US. Better take an interest in the Syrian opposition, which you armed and who killed a huge number of civilians. But no, these are "democratic forces". They can kill civilians. Completely forgot. You can go through all countries with dictatorial regimes in this way and destroy them into dust. It is much more pleasant to live in a bombed-out country with millions of killed inhabitants than under dictatorships. I think the Syrians are grateful to you for the civil war, the divided country and the millions of lives lost. By the way, terrorists appeared in Syria after you unleashed a civil war there, supporting the opposition with weapons. You yourself brought Syria to the state where it was filled with terrorists. Well done. Thank you! We also want the same in Russia. We just dream about it. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds. If my Russia is gone, I will do my best to get into one of your countries and harm you. Just a little hint. If it seems to you that in some country there is not enough democracy, then you do not need to interfere in the affairs of this country. The residents themselves must change their government, the residents themselves must decide the fate, and not you, giving the oppositionists money and arming them to fight against their power. Your intervention in the affairs of a foreign country, on the contrary, is increasing confidence in their leader. We have some oppositionist Navalny there. You don't have to care what we do with him. We ourselves will decide what to do with it and how our authorities should act with it. I am not a fan of Putin, but despite how many years you have been trying to influence Russian politics, I have to support him. It would be better for Putin to rule than your oppositionists, whom you are preparing to replace him.
    1
  48. Oh my friend, how wrong you are. Look at what happened to the republics of the USSR after the collapse. You can read about Turkmenistan.
    1
  49. This is wonderful. Previously, Russia could not cooperate with many countries due to fear of Western countries. Now Russia can make independent decisions. The more countries that ignore orders from the Western Empire, the freer the world will be.
    1
  50. I don't agree. Great Britain lost its power after two world wars. The US took their role.
    1