Comments by "Kora Na" (@korana6308) on "Sandboxx"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@maleprincess62 it has a bomber fuselage. It was designed as a bomber. Then by the very definition of the 5th gen, it was moved into the multirole capability area. That's what defines all modern gen planes, starting from 4th gen and now solidified in the 5th gen. They are all multirole, and are capable of being a multirole fighter because it is defined by the generation that they are in - to be a multirole... It doesn't change the design concept of the plane - it is a bulky craft - designed to carry the most amount of ordinance compare to the rest of the crafts. It can carry more than the F22 despite it being smaller. So it loses in speed and maneuverability. And that's the definition of an air superiority/dominance fighters. They have a certain design philosophy -fuselage type in mind, which makes them extremely maneuverable. The F35 was not designed with that role. It was designed to fit everyones needs. And by the very definition, it had to be forced to be a bulky bomber by it's design, which it did. And hence why it's not an air dominance fighter... As was confirmed multiple times by the officials already (if it wasn't obvious to some before). The replacement for the F22 is coming in the future with an NGAD program, and it did not come with the F35, as that plane is supposed to be "bread and butter" of the airforce. Or the dough's crust without which it would be impossible to bake a pie (any pie). So it's designed to be a to be a staple vessel of the airforce, to just carry as much ordinance as possible, launch it and go back. That's it. And not designed to do anything else. The filling is gonna come in the place of an NGAD program. It goes something like this.
F22 answer Su57
F35 answer Su75
NGAD answer Su 67
SR 72 answer "MiG 41"
etc
Each craft has a completely different and unique role and is not designed to compete outside of it's role. Same with the F35, it's a different role craft compare to the F22, but because we didn't have many roles in the 5th gen to begin with, they wanted to combine and equate all of the roles together, which is not correct.
Thanks for understanding.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DaftDrunk24 classifying the exact numbers produced is nothing new man, it's been done for thousands of years, but in regards to the mil vehicles, The first tanks to begin with of Germany, had inflated numbers too, to make it seem like they had more tanks... That's literally a normal thing for any country to do, trying to hide the real numbers of crafts. So I don't see a point there.
The actual point is that they'd misclassify it by thinking that it was a fighter, but it was an interceptor. Who's fault is that??? It's them who classified it wrongly. That's the intelligence job to begin with, to classify their stuff correctly, and they didn't do it. They've missed their mark there. End of story. And then later trying to blame it on the Soviets... is like trying to present their fup, as it wasn't their fup and they didn't do a bad job lol, but the Soviets didn't tell them exactly what it was... Lol come on... It's an INTERCEPTOR, and it is the best interceptor in the world, especially at that time which had stopped the USAF flying of their "reconnaissance" crafts over the Soviet territory. And consequently changed the doctrine of the USAF to begin with, with going more into stealth after they'd learnt of how good the MiG25 is. They had to change the B1 concept and geared it more towards stealth instead of fast speeds and low bypass(terrain) doctrine. etc. PRECISELY because it was such a good interceptor. Because of one craft only. That's why it is the best interceptor in the world, because it forced the entire nation to change it's doctrine because of it... Only later, to sugarcoat it and say that "eww it's so bad" lol... which is an obvious cop out out of a huge blunder and fup by them. lol...
1
-
1
-
@DaftDrunk24 I don't get it, what's that got to do with "bravado" at all? It's "strictly business" especially at this level of real politics. It was the perfect craft for the times that they were in (at that time of the doctrine). You can't blame them for making the best answer to the doctrine that they had. After they had made an answer to it, the US had obviously answered to it to, by changing the doctrine entirely to a different one...
The most successful fighter is not that though. The most successful fighter(of the 4th gen) is the Su27 series, i. e. Su 27/30/32/33/34/35/37, j 11/15/16. It's the same series craft fighter just in different flavors. Nothing comes even close to it.
Puffin it up is normal. It is expected by the state party to say that their crafts are the best, that's what they are funding to begin with, so of course they would be saying that it's good... Why is that surprising to anyone? Same thing that they do inside China for their J20, same thing that they do for Su57 inside Russia, same thing that they do for the F22 inside USA. That is absolutely normal, and shouldn't be surprising to anyone. It's us - the people who can view it from the third party's side and judge objectively by ourselves and we can tell which craft is better or worse objectively to us (and not to the state). Blaming other side that they are "puffing up their crafts" is in my opinion, absolute madness. As that is absolutely normal and that should be expected.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1