Comments by "HomerOJSimpson" (@Homer-OJ-Simpson) on "Johnny Harris" channel.

  1.  @BS-vf1nv  "So the factcheckingpart should be done by the person who listens." Did you even watch this video? It says people generally don't so by allowing people to speak without being fact checked, dangerous ideas and fake news gets spread.
    2
  2.  @DaltonFTT  "but it’s not you, Johnny Harris’s or anyone else’s right for that matter " You realize you are making the worst argument ever. If something is dangerous such as Joe Rogan letting people speak and spread lies, it does not mean me or Jonny Harris are saying Joe should be legally forced to change his show. All you proved is that I am right that was Rogan does is bad because otherwise, you wouldn't have twisted this into what is legal or not then crated a strawman argument suggesting I am saying Rogan should be removed from the air.
    2
  3. Hey drew! Love your stuff! Been watching you since 2019 or so. I guess Johnny joined Nebula. Any plans for you to join as nebula? Or are travel videos not a target for nebula content?
    2
  4. @ I’ve saved a few videos of warfront to watch later. Thanks for the recommendation
    2
  5. It’s china that wants to attack a little innocent country and China who has conc camps
    2
  6. I wonder if the thousands of users defending China in the last video will make an appearance in these comment sections? Lol. They also flooded Uptins comment section and basically any video about China these days.
    2
  7. Sanctions don’t stop the CURRENT action but they deter future action. One these governments start something they won’t stop but they might never had started other bad deeds if not for the threats of sanctions. Had Rus known how far the Eu and US would go on sanctions, it’s very likely RUS would never had invaded UKR. They assumed the west wouldn’t put severe sanctions on them
    1
  8.  @Slithermotion  yes, but did you miss the part where I said the Swiss stopped caring about those bunkers because they are surrounded by friendly Allies in 2022?
    1
  9.  @Slithermotion  I don’t even understand the purpose of your comment when I addressed it in my original post. And you make it sound like the Swiss were peaceful before they went into the neutral mode. They were the hired guns of europe for centuries. They fought wars all around Europe.
    1
  10.  @Slithermotion  you’re saying NATO and EU aren’t friendly to Swiss? You work for Moscow?
    1
  11.  @Slithermotion  The Swiss are neutral and can stay like that because they are given the luxury of being protected by the EU and NATO. There is no way you can rightfully disagree with that that. Just like Canada is protected by the US and so is Taiwan.
    1
  12. ​ @Slithermotion  The EU's Mutual Defence Clause — Article 42.7 in the Treaty of Lisbon — was approved in 2007 and has been in force since 2009. It states that "if an EU country is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other EU countries have an obligation to aid and assist it by all means in their power."
    1
  13.  @Slithermotion  I just gave you info on the eu military clause but I was more referring to the member states itself and not the EU organization. If Swiss neighbors ever wanted to, they could have made life horrible for the Swiss, bombed them to smitherings, blocked them from any trade, etc. They are at the mercy of it's neighbors. But it's neighbors are nice (now) and the Swiss don't have to worry about any threats -- they benefit by being surrounded by countries that are very friendly to the Swiss over the past 50+ years and will be very friendly to them going forward as well. To deny those facts just shows you don't care for facts.
    1
  14. Huh, you are okay with inaccurate videos on US but hated when he did one on China? W8má0
    1
  15. @HovanCarlo showing she doesn’t know history. 1948, it was Palestn and Arabs that sent their troops into Isrl to destroy it. How someone be this uneducated on the topic they act like they care about?
    1
  16.  @cyberverse9141  there were hundreds of thousands of Jews already in that BRITISH and OTTOMAN territory. The rulers of the lands allowed Jews to come. How do you think those lands got full of Arab Muslims??!
    1
  17.  @Okay_justcallmekim  let me guess….Kim is low on education on a topic you weighed in on and don’t know it was Palest and Arab M8slims that went into Isrl in 48 to end the state?
    1
  18.  @Donetravlin  exactly what? That M8slim Arabs and Palest sent in troops to Isr in 1948 to end they state? Failed and kept trying for Decades? When did Georgie send troops into Russia to try to end the state? Thought so
    1
  19.  @Malik-lh4jh  you are aware that the Palestn and other Ar8bs sent troops into Isr to end it in -948?
    1
  20.  @cyberverse9141  it was ottoman and British lands, not a Palestinian land. How again did Ar8b M8slims end up there?
    1
  21. I would believe most Chinse here if they weren’t at the same time denying what’s going on Xinjiang
    1
  22. Are you legally allowed by your govt to acknowledge what’s going on in western China?
    1
  23.  @lmlmlmz  You're all about the Han supremacy, right?
    1
  24.  @lmlmlmz  But okay, why is it that most chinse wont' admit the the facts on this?
    1
  25. Hello propagandist!
    1
  26.  @PranavKadamares  u Indians are all the same in trying to defend your close relationship with rus. EU passed lots of sanctions and are cutting over half of their purchase of oil and gas from Rus by years end but you want to pretend EU isn’t doing anything so it justifies India HELPING Rus?
    1
  27.  @NotEvenDeathCanSaveU  huh, you 50 çé-nt crowd are east to spot. What happened in 1989 near Tiananmen Square?
    1
  28.  @newchoppak  u made the dû-mb-est comment there is. Many of his videos are anti west and especially anti US. He has a whole series of “how the US stole [insert country or land]”. Just wow
    1
  29.  @NotEvenDeathCanSaveU  “good try” you clearly don’t know Johnny Harris. He has a lots of videos that are anti US and anti west. You haven’t Watched his other content
    1
  30.  @NotEvenDeathCanSaveU  so Johnny Harris makes content that is mostly criticizing the west and especially the US but yet he’s a pro west journalist? His latest video bus criticizing the US (and UK and Sweden)for its ) handling of Julian Assange. What’s with you?
    1
  31.  @NotEvenDeathCanSaveU  He literally crities the US and west and you still want to say he's very pro west becuase he doesn't share your extreme anti-west opinions "it is from the very start made in a way where he portrays the other side as the "bad guys"." There we go-- a Pu-ti-n Pal.
    1
  32.  @NotEvenDeathCanSaveU  Slava Ukraini!
    1
  33.  @NotEvenDeathCanSaveU  u outed urself as pro Pu-tin. Slavs Ukrani!
    1
  34.  @mrj3217  Русский тролль
    1
  35.  @mrj3217  >"Sanctions against Russia have only hurt poor. Russians " so like all of Russia? And all of of Putin's supporters? >Now the Russian stock market has backup as well as the ruble is better than ever. Stock market in Russia is down nearly 40% YTD and even though the ruble is a bit better YTD, it's because Russian government has been forced to make a lot of changes which is why inflation is rampant. Trade one devil for another. The longer the sanctions last, the worst it's going to get. Russia will run out of their ability to buy their rubles, the 15% interest rates will kill much of the domestic economy, the inability to bring in many foreign goods directly will lead to shortages and thus rampant inflation. Let's also not forget the brain drain -- a very large number of educated people have fled already.
    1
  36.  @mrj3217  Ukraine will have the west spending probably over $100 billion to repair Ukraine -- Russia will have no one and will be economically and military and geopolitically much weaker for invading Ukraine. While you complain about the poor in Russia having to deal with sanctions -- why not complain about the tens of thousands of Ukranians killed by Russia?
    1
  37.  Zulsyakir  hello Putin pal. Slava Ukraini
    1
  38.  @Ryanlexz  Slava ukraini
    1
  39.  @-Scrapper-  those generic comments are almost always done without watching and to get likes
    1
  40.  @carlmunene  Yeah, the most land that is conquered, the more deaths they tend to be. Mongolians were responsible for so many deaths because they fought many times in many different regions. If Europeans weren't the first to get the edge, we would still colonialism but from someone else.
    1
  41.  @feandil666  The same China where they are on a brink of a collapse? The same China that is now expecting far lower GDP growth than Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and Hong Kong when they were are the same GDP per capita? The same China where foreign investment is reducing rapidly due to the govt? The same China that is a threat to basically all it's a neighbors? The same china with conc amps in Xinjiang? Yeah, what a great system.
    1
  42.  @drrocketman7794  Capitalism isn't an issue... but laissez-faire capitalism is.
    1
  43. @abroadinjapan I love your channel
    1
  44. @LuqmanLSG, that sounds catchy and cool but it sounds like HORRIBLE policy because of the consequences it will have.
    1
  45.  @denelson83  The "only such consequences". You make it sound like capital strike and capital flight aren't terrible....unless that was humor and I missed it? Can't tell when 80% of the comments here would seem to think that's good.
    1
  46.  @BigBoiiLeem  "and then restructured before being made private again." So then it's not at all what OP suggest. In addition, it wasn't tax payer money used for SVB. It was money that was collected from banks.
    1
  47.  @denelson83  To devastate an economy is bad, right? Your original post had “only such consequences” made me think you were arguing it wasn’t that bad if it happened.
    1
  48.  @BigBoiiLeem  you do know my question was for the OP, right? I don’t care that you’ve been saying it front the start (saying what exactly?), because that’s not relevant to what OP was arguing. OP seemed to be suggesting permanently nationalizing because their whole argument about “privatize the profits, socialize the losses” pointed at a permanent nationalization of the bank. You’re example is not relevant to what OP seemed to be suggesting.
    1
  49. Johnny, when did you become part of Nebula?? I joined 2-3 weeks ago and didn’t see you. I’m glad you joined because nebula has so much potential if enough get involved. I’m liking nebula for the exclusive content so far as well as no ads. If enough YouTubers go to nebula, we can see more content that doesn’t have to be careful of stories that YT sponsors support.
    1
  50. In most major cities in the US, big markets have a bakery in them as well.
    1