Comments by "" (@NinjaKittyBonks) on "The Officer Tatum"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cowel8734 ...
#1 Opening sentence: Correct, but the foundation of an "excuse" has been given, by the endless demonizing of [people+pale+skin] as acceptable and rewarded behavior
#2 Second sentence: Spot-on
#3 Closing sentence: You have confused me. It is perfectly OK for me or anyone to blame those responsible for not just what we see in this video, but express disgust for Joseph Goebbels Propaganda media, who will overwhelmingly ignore this story or simply report and "altercation" between students at school. Were this to be [reversed+attacked/attackers]... there is a 100% chance this story would be covered by ALL of those same "journalists / news" outlets, with a headline stating some variation of.... "single [dark+grey+skin+person] student violently attacked by [pale+skin+person] and was unprovoked" (see #1 above). YES... everyone should be held accountable, but since overwhelmingly, those depicted doing aggression, are exceptionally often not held accountable or to a very small degree. It is THESE exceptions of accountability being demanded (combined #1 above), that bolster the "excuse".
.
This sounds extreme. However, consider the worst of the worst actions that made slavery (the 'excuse" stems from this) so evil... it was the dehumanization of black people! Society is being told that it is perfectly acceptable to perpetrate this SAME action, so long as that person fits [demographic] seen against the lockers in this video.
.
(algorithm hoop jumping was necessary)
1
-
1
-
@cowel8734 .... I will repost with further changes:
==========================================================================================
#1 Opening sentence: Correct, but the foundation of an "excuse" provided, by the endless [treatment+poorly] of [fair+people+skin] as [alright] behavior
#2 Second sentence: Spot-on
#3 Closing sentence: You have confused me. It is perfectly OK for me or anyone to blame [persons] for not just what we see in this video, but express [thoughts+about+media], who will overwhelmingly [pretend+didn't+happen] this story or simply report an "altercation" between students at school. Were this to be [reversed+rolls]... there is [complete] chance this story would be covered by ALL of those same "journalists / news" outlets, with a headline stating some variation of.... "single [dark+grey+skin+person] student [harmed] by [pale+skin+person] and was [not+warranted]" (see #1 above). YES... everyone should be held [standard+accept], but since overwhelmingly, those depicted doing [things+bad], are exceptionally often not held [such+standard] or to a very small degree. It is THESE exceptions of [standard] being asked (combined #1 above), that bolster that "excuse".
.
This sounds extreme. However, consider the worst of the worst actions that made [labor+forced+dark grey+persons] (the 'excuse" stems from this) so [actions of being who lives center of earth].. it was the [subtraction+humanity+ of [people+dark grey+skin]! Society is being told that it is perfectly acceptable to do the same, so long as that person fits [demographic] seen against the lockers in this video.
.
(hoop jumping entirely necessary)
1
-
1
-
@cowel8734 ...I will try a 3rd time...Truth, logic, evidence, fact. Facts, truth, logic. Logic, truth fact. Fact, logic, truth. Conclusion because fact, logic and truth. Shown to be truth, by logic, evidence and fact, combined with more truth.
.
To summarize... facts, logic, evidence, truth are not allowed here.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Typhus-th6ud .. I don't understand why you are putting this much effort into what I said and projecting so much upon it. The line "Do not become that which you fight" is a philosophical statement that is a warning that one must not compromise their own morals, in order to defeat / overcome another by doing the same thing.
.
Tell me, why is it a bad thing to consider your own moral standards when "engaged" with one who's are far lower? This is would be like one person cheating at sport to win and then you cheating MORE to win yourself. Would you feel good about that win? I would not feel good about that win, so my goal, in such a scenario would NOT be to "cheat more" , but rather try to stop his / her ability to cheat or simply expose it to others, so that they must face the public scrutiny.
.
I literally could not care less who it was that first said that line. It could have been in a Cracker-Jack box and would be 100% as valid a moral compass as if were proposed to be said by God in the Bible.
.
Your closing line is really where we are and what I said in my OP. I would and DO my best to overcome, but not sell my own principles. So, as abhorrent as what we see in the [lee + gall] system happening today, must be [reese } iprocated] in order to expose to them how bad it is. The problem we have is that the media will not report in good faith, so is very hard to play the SAME game, yet not be claimed as infinitely worse.
.
That is the price we are gonna have to pay.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1