Comments by "Bobby Jones" (@bobbyjones8317) on "Styxhexenhammer666" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. The facebook pages, blogs and youtubers are all usually biased anyways. So it doesn't matter really. Also, these things just speak about what's going on in the news cycle anyways. The main media is the most influential. I don't think youth voters will ever swing right. It isn't about people leaning more right, it's how left leaning people such as the youth are less likely to vote. But the bases of both sides will still come out and vote because as much as Trump fires up right wingers, liberals also hate him and will turn out to vote as much as they usually do to vote against him. It's just the undecided people in the middle that are malleable. I think the debates are enough to sway them and also if they start a bad news cycle. It's going to be tough for Trump when he barely has any ground game. Knocking on doors and reminding people to vote is still effective. Also, it is still negative when you have big members of your own party against you. We all know the extreme right wingers don't care but are the republican leaning independent people still going to show up and vote? Or will they vote Hillary like Bush is doing. And while I think some gigantic scandal would be needed to knock Hillary out, I don't think the final wikileaks release will do anything especially in the context that they've already worn it out to death. If it's just more email shit then nobody will care. Yeah yeah yeah we already know that scandal. There can just as easily be a big scandal leaked on Trump that we don't already know about. Simply finding something already on public record but highlighting it can even be enough to bring him down, such as this miss universe stuff right now.
    2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. It's actually just the capitalist mode of production and the same capitalist relations. They have invited foreign capital into their country. But they've been able to survive crisis and continue their economic growth because of their centralized government and the way they plan. When issues arise, the Peoples Republic acts more decisively than the liberal democracies of the west, whether it be from natural disasters, protests, corruption in the party, traffic and pollution, etc. Because of the centralized party/state they can take immediate action when problems arise, while western liberal democracies all blabber like idiots when problems arise in all their different political parties fighting for electoral power and they never accomplish anything. When China transitioned from rural to an urban society they did it way more effectively than any of the other emerging industrial powers like the U.S. and Britain who both relied on war and imperialism to establish themselves. China's investment into other countries is also superior to the U.S., while the U.S. destroys other countries through war and destabilization, China builds things in other countries. China builds socially useful development, the West provides shitty fast food franchises and decedent commodities like porn and video games. China isn't much different from the so called "mixed" economies of socialist and capitalist that have existed in Western countries during times of crisis with the state having matched power to the capitalist class. The difference is the one party centralism of the revolution has remained. The party that swept the ruling class from power still maintains control. And party members still have a vision for socialism and ultimately, to communism. This why when global economic crisis strikes I have more reason to bet that China could overcome it and survive better than the U.S. could.
    2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2