Comments by "" (@yellowtunes2756) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1. ​ @gdutfulkbhh7537  by kidnapped children you mean orphans which were left behind by brave Ukrainian army? The same orphans that were moved away from the warzone to best Russian summer camps? The same orphans that were returned to Ukrainian parents if their parents wanted to? Since when saving kids is a bad thing?
    2
  2. If a paper tiger outproduces the entire NATO, then what would you call NATO?
    2
  3. ​ @toja123  you forgot to mention that Russia was INVITED by the Afghan and Syrian governments. Unlike terrorists that NATO supported Georgia, just like Ukraine, was bombing civilians at Russian borders. And Georgia is perfectly fine now Chechnya was flooded with terrorists who used kids as hostages. Google Beslan What neighbours are afraid of Russia outside of american puppets? Did Putin invade a single country that wasn't bombing civilians at Russian borders?
    2
  4.  @alexiskiri9693  im quoting cbs and richest army in the world. If they can't do everything perfect from the start - Russia can't do it too. But it doesn't mean that Russia doesn't have equipment
    2
  5.  @alexiskiri9693  Ukraine gets only around 500 precise shells per month, so only 1.5% of their shots are accurate . And Russia also uses precise ammo
    2
  6.  @jpmanning5480  you're just spreading Ukranian propaganda According to interview of Washington post with Ukranian soldiers from Kherson offensive - Ukraine lost 5 people for every Russian. And since it came from a Ukrainian soldiers - ratio is probably even worse for Ukraine. And it's a lot worse on daily basis when no-one is attacking, but Russia has outnumbered Ukraine in artillery 15 to 1 according to Ukrainian officials, while 80% of casualties in any war are caused by artillery. So on average day Ukraine looses around 10-15 times more than Russia and 5+ times more than Russia during offensives. So if Ukrainian numbers about Russian casualties are true - Ukraine lost at least 350k dead. Seems wrong, don't you think? It's always like this with propaganda numbers if you put them into perspective I mean, you has to know that those numbers are part Ukrainian propaganda, so why are you repeating them?
    2
  7.  @andrii.romaniuk  what bullshit? Quote me There's no way of proving that destroyed tank (for example) is Russian or Ukrainian. Same goes for majority of equipment, cos both sides mostly use the same equipment Amount of destroyed vehicles has little to do with casualties. Majority of Russian army (before mobilization) was mechanised, while majority of Ukrainian army was sitting in trenches It's not me who's telling about Ukrainian losses, it's Ukrainian soldiers who gave interview to Washington post. And pure logic suggest that on average day with no offense from Ukraine - ratio between Russia and Ukraine is a lot worse for Ukraine, since they are drastically outgunned "One mobilization extended few times" - fancy words for multiple mobilization waves According to many mercs who left Ukraine - Ukrainian territorial defense troops had up to 3 days of training. Of course it's not the case for people who train in EU, but they are minority of Ukrainian army
    2
  8. "it's like a repeat" - no. Putin never invaded a single country that wasn't bombing civilians at Russian borders. We also have a history of Putin invading Georgia for bombing South Ossetia, Georgia still exists and nothing bad happened to them, the good guy Russia stopped the war
    2
  9.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  But Ukraine was bombing civilian of Donbas, they also used cluster ammo on Donetsk city and dammed the river to Crimea to deliberately starve 2 million people. Georgia has been bombing South Ossetia from time to time since 1991 NATO also invaded Serbia to protect the people of Kosovo. Do you see links between NATO and Germany in ww2 too?
    2
  10. ​ @wiziek  in what way is Russia worse than Ukraine or any NATO country? In what way is Russia worse than Israel? All wars end with negotiations
    2
  11.  @mariaf.6601  just because you defend yourself - doesn't mean that you aren't evil. Doesn't mean that you aren't committing tons of war crimes and endangering civilians.
    2
  12. ​ @ettoreatalan8303  according to CNN Russia makes 3 times more shells than the entire NATO
    2
  13.  @ettoreatalan8303  Kiev independent also reported it. There are plenty of sources in the internet and not a single one suggests that NATO makes more artillery shells than Ukraine. So what's your point again?
    2
  14.  @bluemarlin8138  according to Washington post and their interview with Ukrainian soldiers - Ukraine looses 5 soldiers for every Russian. And in average day (when noone is attacking) this ratio should be even worse for Ukraine, since Russia outnumberes Ukraine in artillery 15 to 1 according to Ukrainian officials
    2
  15.  @davidr3382  it's the thing for every army when government sending a lot of soldiers somewhere. For example there's a news article from cbsnews from 2004 about American soldiers having to buy their own armour. So of course Russia will have some problems at the beginning of mobilization, it's not easy to transport 300k equipment everywhere it's necessary
    2
  16. According to the World Bank and IMF - Russian economy grows faster than any G7 member
    2
  17. What's th3 difference between Russia treating their soldiers and Ukraine treating their soldiers? First thing comes to mind is Ukraine sacrificing their own people for PR stunts of holding the city despite encirclement, or sending them to a certain death to raise the flag in Crimea or Belgorod, or the fact that they still hold Krinky and sacrifice thousands for no reason at all. In comparison with Russia, which had no issue from withdrawing from Kherson or Kiev to save their soldiers
    2
  18. Soviet c300 is better than any air defence NATO has btw. And everything else Ukraine received is either worse than Russian analogues or just as good at best. For example pzh2000 got the same range and accuracy like koalitsya, but koalitsya operated by less people. Himars has the same range and accuracy as tornado s and smerch, bur far worse range than iskander, kalibr and kinzjal Russia uses to hit targets far away. What advantage does Ukraine has again? Not sure how can Ukrainians push if their equipment hiding in forests will he visible to Russian artillery. Will they hide in cities again?
    2
  19.  @mhlangamlungisi5108  not exactly true. Weapons indeed haven't done much, since USSR had huge production. But wagons and trains were a great help
    2
  20. ​ @mariaf.6601 it's a puppet organisation and cannot be trusted
    2
  21. They couldn't take Krinky, how the hell will they capture Crimea lol. Do you want to wipe out the entirety of the Ukrainian population or something?
    2
  22. Nazism has nothing to do with Jews mate. Btw, the same Jewish president gave standing ovations to an old nazi from UPA in Canadian parliament
    2
  23.  @occhamite  same goes with Russia. What's the difference between Russian culture and Ukrainian? Same language (for Eastern half of Ukraine), culture, architecture, mindset, looks, religion, history etc. Can't think of any differences other than haircuts a few hundred years ago
    2
  24.  @dpelpal  комменты удаляются к сожалению, так что перейду на русский Ты думаешь украинские военные тоже смеются над Россией сидя под фабами и тосами? Думаешь уничтожение рандомных катеров им помогает ? И где конкретно я солгал?
    2
  25.  @evgeniya7853  A fool's hope I guess
    2
  26.  @richardjoseph9002  I'm not gonna argue about moral aspects of supporting the rebels, but NATO did the same thing in like 30 countries in last 60 years. Do you think Obama is also evil for supporting rebels in Syria? Do you think all American presidents are evil for supporting Taiwan?
    2
  27. Do you know exact percentage of intercepted targets by Russian anti air? Why are you saying that their anti air is nonexistent if they have best air defence in the world by far? There's no evidence that Russia uses c300 rocket's to hit the ground. As we saw in Poland - those rockets can fall and kill people without anyone aiming for them (of course if we assume that Ukraine wasn't trying to start ww3 by deliberately killing civilians in Poland). Also, only few c300 launchers can hit the ground. And Russia replaced 70% of c300 with c400 few years ago
    2
  28. ​ @phaelox  by "Kremlin talking points" you mean reality? There's a reason why you couldn't dispute his points and you know that
    2
  29.  @cv990a4  no-one is recruiting prisoners. Some random person said it and Ukrainian propaganda capitalised on it Everyone always wants more troops. When was the last time someone said "damn, i wish we had less soldiers on the battlefield" Russia can mobilize few million conscripts at any time, they have enough equipment to do that
    2
  30.  @terjeoseberg990  Ukraine was part of Russia for a thousand of years, since Knyaz' of Novgorod (Russia ln city) captured Kiev and called his new lands Kievan Rus'.
    2
  31. ​ @cormchm2853 people in eastern Ukrainian regions want to be part of Russia Btw, do you also think Ukraine trying to reclaim Crimea and Donbas is "wrong wrong wrong" since locals were fighting against Ukraine for over a decade?
    2
  32. Like USA did in Baghdad. But unlike USA, Russia kills far more enemy soldiers than civilians
    1
  33.  @enpakeksi765  protest is protest. Especially if 10 people gather around you disrupting traffic. Especially especially in places that are forbidden from protesting in (like red square). And all you will get is a small fine
    1
  34.  @enpakeksi765  if you're alone, then you don't need to notify anyone because it's a picket. But you still can't protest near some places (like the red square or some governmental buildings)
    1
  35. It's easy to say things like this when you sit in safety on the other side of the globe
    1
  36. Do you realise that any estimations of enemy casualties during war is nothing but war propaganda? Russia lost 52k soldiers in entire war including PMCs and prisoners according to mediazona, which uses actual data from cemeteries and social media
    1
  37. ​ @sharonlavery7656  loss of equipment has nothing to do with overall losses. It's about fire power
    1
  38.  @mariaf.6601  in artillery shells, tanks, rockets and bombs
    1
  39.  @mariaf.6601  I don't know about aviation ones, but Russia fires more rockets than USA makes patriot missiles. Russia also uses around 200-300 dumb bombs per day, while USA makes 170 jdams per day Pretty much all experts admit that Russia makes 3 times more artillery shells than the entire NATO. What about quality and effectiveness? During war you want as much ammo as you can get. I don't think that anyone ever said "I wish I had less weapons". Also USA bought ammo from South Korea and Japan, I guess it also means something bad Even Russia lost all of their tanks - they would still have more tanks on the battlefield because Russia produces more tanks than entire NATO. Btw, leopard 1 is as old as t55. But, unlike Ukraine, Russia doesn't use their old tanks as MBT, but rather as artillery systems because they fire different caliber than newer models
    1
  40. @Zbigniew_Nowak  sure, if they won't be flooded with radicals and terrorists like the last time
    1
  41. Drones are operated by Ukraine, long range rockets are operated by NATO. That's the difference
    1
  42. Everything behind the backs of Russian soldiers is Russia. Ukraine should leave Russian lands, peace will be achieved immediately
    1
  43.  @hedgehog3180  lying where exactly? I don't care about ICJ opinion, I care about facts and reality. And I'll start to take ICJ into consideration the moment they throw in jail some American president or Netanyahu
    1
  44. But USSR won in Afghanistan and when they left the country - the pro Soviet Afghan government still controlled the country
    1
  45. ​ @mariaf.6601 not a single Russian official ever said anything about 3 days. Haven't pro Ukrainian NPCs got tired of it already? But only after 2 years of war Ukraine is already low on manpower despite kidnapping people off streets, banning men from leaving Ukraine or cancelling men's passports abroad to force them to come back. Looks like the Russian strategy of grinding down Ukraine is working just fine, especially since Russia is making more ammo and tanks than entire NATO combined
    1
  46. ​ @RobertFromEarth  Is this why Russia is growing their army with only volunteers, while Ukraine is snatching people off streets to throw them into the military by force? So much care for humanity lol
    1
  47.  @thomasdalton1508  10 to 1 is rough estimation of Russian advantage in fire power (artillery, aviation, armour etc). We can use your numbers if you feel like it Mediazona is using graveyards and social media to count fallen Russian soldiers. So it's as accurate as it can be "Russia was on the offensive elsewhere on the frontline" - where? They did pretty much nothing until the attack on Avdeevka in October. And if you're counting tiny random counter attacks all over the frontline, then you should also count Ukrainian counter attacks all over the frontline right now "I would be surprised if the Ukrainian offensive inflicted such high casualties" - it's not offensive or defensive actions that inflict the majority of casualties, but bombing of enemy positions, drones hunting soldiers during rotation, rockets hitting military bases etc. That's why I'm confused why do you think that a huge Russian advantage in fire power can be neglected this easy Also, there's no 3 to 1 ratio between attackers and defenders. I have no idea who gave birth to this myth. 3 to 1 ratio is about the difference in manpower needed to win the battle with far lower casualties than your enemy. For example if 10 guys will fight 10 guys, then there will be only 1 guy left. But if 30 guys will fight 10, then the 10 guys will lose everyone, while 30 guys will lose like 3 (instead of 10). So that general who created this theory was convinced that the greater advantage your soldiers have over the enemy - the less casualties you will have. This has nothing to do with attackers and defenders. And in modern days it's about fire power. A hundred soldiers sitting in a trench will lose to 1 pilot with 3000kg bomb
    1
  48. He's throwing unwilling Ukrainians into vans and then throwing them into cauldrons to slow down Russian progress. He doesn't have a spine, he's just evil
    1
  49. ​ @traumflug  According to mediazona Russia loses around 70 soldiers per day. And they have actual data from cemeteries and social media unlike random propaganda you're listening to
    1
  50. By "some reports" you mean official data from Russian government. And they were talking about recruiting volunteers, there's nothing "covert" about it. Prisoners who join the army aren't convicts, but volunteers
    1