Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "Free Documentary - History" channel.

  1. Dude. Other countries knew within days because they had spies in the political offices running it and civilians managed to guess the Americans were building a bomb without even seeing it because they went "Hmmm, why did America suddenly stop publishing nuclear energy papers".
    2
  2. Spielberg was running odd jobs for television and didn't become a big name until Jaws in 1975
    2
  3. "Respond immediately?" They take several seconds to respond. Why do you people insist on using a "proof" you haven't even watched?
    2
  4. Japan took pictures of the terrain, converted it into 3D models, and found exact replicas of the photograph backgrounds ~15 years ago. The hoaxers immediately went "That's fake too!"
    2
  5. You can see massive amounts of dust get kicked by the ship takes off. That's why it becomes hazy, even though the camera is hundreds of feet away. You can also see that the dust settles IMMEDIATELY; dust doesn't float in a vacuum Also, I don't think most vehicles on Earth throw dust three feet in the air while moving at less than ten miles per hour.
    2
  6. The camera was attached to the ship on a drop-down panel that was opened from inside.
    2
  7.  @bigboreracing356  Yeaaaah no they aren't. You realize that anybody can calculate the resolution you'd need right? It's a ratio of the size of your object / distance to it converted into arcseconds.
    2
  8.  @eFutureTechOnline  Create what? A telescope big enough? You realize that would have to be HUNDREDS OF FEET ACROSS right? That's not something you can just create on a whim to satisfy armchair "historians".
    2
  9. Benjamin Franklin actually.
    2
  10. Ted.... the "Chinese probe finds no evidence of Apollo" is from World News Daily Report, a knockoff of the Onion, and the probe in question is hundreds of miles away.
    2
  11. Funny considering that Japan made a big deal about ten years ago of having found the Apollo sites and perfectly recreated the backgrounds while converting their terrain maps into 3D models.
    2
  12. Fun fact: Liquid Oxygen takes up approximately 1/800th of the volume of the same quantity of room temperature oxygen.
    2
  13. For reference, that's slightly larger than a quarter at arm's length. Also, I'm not entirely sure why you think it would be this grand novel sight at how large it is when they've been watching it shrink and shrink and shrink and shrink in the window for several days. By the way, the moon's tidal locking means the Earth sits in one place in the sky and doesn't move. That's almost straight up from the landing spots, not a place you can easily point a camera at while it's attached to your chest unless you want to do the limbo. That's a great argument by the way. "The moon landigns are fake because the astronauts spent their pictures on scientific research, not wasting government supplies gushing like a weak-kneed sentimental tourist that doesn't give a damn what they're actually supposed to be doing."
    2
  14. ..... that's.... not what a wide angle lens is.
    2
  15.  @chadkline4268  ..... Chad. He deliberately keeps the facts that prove him as a big liar off his channel. If you tell people to go watch a liar's videos, who deliberately hides the truth, they're going to assume that he's telling the truth.
    2
  16. Cities that can't support themselves because there's no food, air, or water on the moon? We were at the deepest parts of the ocean before the moon, and nobody's built Rapture either.
    2
  17. Which is hilarious, because your "truth" leaders would put those politicians out of a job .
    2
  18.  @martinlayne1299  Because it shows all of the countries of the world at once. A globe only shows half.
    2
  19. You realize that Bart was unmasked as a fraud over a decade ago right? He got caught lying through his teeth and faking evidence, then had to shut off comments on his channel because he got called out on it.
    2
  20. "Hewers of stone" is the biggest stretch I've ever seen. Houston is English and Scottish name meaning "Hugh's Town", and Houston is named after General Sam Houston, their former governor. It also predates the moon landings by a hundred years. Does God appreciate "Christians" that lie in his name?
    2
  21. You mean other than the church?
    2
  22. Because the people sending stuff to the moon generally have better things to do with the millions of dollars this costs them then to take pictures that will just be called fake as well.
    2
  23. The camera was attached to the ship on a drop-down panel for storing equipment. NASA sends and receives transmissions on dishes that are larger than your house.
    2
  24. .... because solid objects block radio signals. That has nothing to do with how 'advanced' your technology is.
    2
  25. There have been several satellites orbiting the moon taking pictures. The hoaxers call those fake too.
    2
  26. Okay. The Earth has a surface area of approximately 196 million square miles and a volume of 260 billion cubic miles. The moon is approximately 30 Earth diameters away. That is TRILLIONS of cubic miles of space between the Earth and the moon. And both your ship and the objects they're avoiding are much, much, much smaller than a mile across. Sure, I bet hitting an object the size of a bullet would be devastating. But that requires you to hit, unless you are deliberately flying through a debris field, the odds of this is extremely low.
    2
  27. Liquid oxygen takes up approximately 1/800th of the volume of the same quantity of room temperature gas.
    2
  28. Um... no, it's least at the poles. They're shaped like a donut. And no meteorite would fool geologists. Meteorites contain glass, and if you try and remove the glass, they'll find your tool marks once it gets examined with a microscope.
    2
  29. An unmanned camera attached to the ship.
    2
  30. Um.... Russia never used monkeys. They used dogs for their early tests, and tortoises on their probes through the belts. They had zero deaths to radiation, only to other factors. That's like trying claim that "nuclear power plants can't contain the radiation" because a worker in the break room slipped on a banana peel and cracked his head open on the table. No, they gave up because their rocket BLEW UP and fixing it would put them so far behind the Americans that they'd never be relevant again.
    2
  31. ... and why should we believe him? Especially since the very first "factual" claim in that video was that the project's name was Slam Dunk - even though the term 'slam dunk" was coined AFTER Apollo?
    2
  32.  @michaelstillman1171  Obviously, the date it broadcast. But the hoaxers are pretending it was the beginning of July in 1968 on a date LBJ was accounted for because that's what fraud Bart Sibrel's "confession" video says
    2
  33. A Funny Thing was gutted years ago. Go ask the creator Bart Sibrel why he edited his "faking the distance" videot o remove parts of it where you could see them filming without his supposed trick. Also.... wait wait wait. Krishna Tube? I don't believe that for one second. Guess they're flying under the radar because Bart's more aggressive with his copyright enforcement than Disney.
    1
  34.  @TheWokeFlatEarthTruth  Yes
    1
  35. No, he wasn't. He was a deist.
    1
  36. Objects FREEZE in the thermosphere. The issue is that those outer layers of the atmosphere are too dilute for convection to happen. There's just not enough of it. It doesn't matter how hot the gas is if there's not enough of it touch you to transfer heat faster than every other point on the surface loses heat via thermal radiation.
    1
  37. Nixon called NASA and NASA patched the call into their communications broadcasts. Radio stations have been doing this with callers since the 30s. The picture on the wall is from either Apollo 8 or 10, which circled the moon but didn't land.
    1
  38. If the stars were in the photos, the photos would be ruined. In order for stars to appear on film, you need an exposure time of over a second in length. If they were visible, all of those bright sunlit objects in the foreground would be overexposed into a blinding blur. By the way, they took UV photos of the Earth and stars on Apollo 16. These were, in fact, pinpointed to the moon based on the Earth's position against the zodiac.
    1
  39.  @chatryna  By the way, Aldrin's violence came after Bart repeatedly harassed him, called him hundreds of miles out of his way by lying about his identity, tried to physically bar him from leaving until the hotel staff kicked him out, then chased him through the street hurling insults.
    1
  40. No, they never claimed that. Your fellow "truth seekers" lie and misrepresent what NASA claims.
    1
  41. .... the flag has a rod through the top holding it out.
    1
  42.  @royvalenzuela1371  And a nuclear confrontation would cause our mutually assured destruction. We do not win doing this, we cannot win, and the entire world will turn against us if we try, so Russia can probably call our bluff fairly reliably. Also, you do realize that if the moon landings were faked, Russia and China would both attempt to take that title away from us and claim it for themselves right?
    1
  43. Does a person that lives their entire life, birth to death, without having even heard of God, still go to hell? Does God refuse to let children in thast haven't been batpized even if they've lived good life, or died too young to make conscious decisions? The Catholics used to believe so. They used to secretly baptize and kidnap non-Christian children they thought were about to die. Even Satan's not evil enough to damn and torture babies.
    1
  44. @Nuno Ferreira  stop hiding behind scripture and answer the question. What happens to people that legitimately don't know or are too young to understand. The fact that none of you have the guts to think on it and respond with your own words says a lot.
    1
  45. It's some issue with the camera staring at the same object so long it takes a while for it to clear, resulting in overlapping images. There's a spot where the camera gets shifted and you can see two horizons for a few seconds.
    1
  46. And the people "proving the lie" have themselves been caught lying about their proof.
    1
  47. Why would you want to? Marcus Allen's a shill. He gets paid big bucks to lie in order to sell more copies of that magazine he works for.
    1
  48. There are people that don't use AdBlock?
    1
  49.  @starroger  I use Adblock Plus. I don't get ads on youtube but some websites get pissy about it and you'll have to turn it off on that page.
    1
  50. The one that's basically a straight line on a person turning to look behind him? Meanwhile, you people line up to lie about how the driver somehow shoots him with the hair on the passenger's head. Sounds like you believe in magic bullets.
    1