General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Kevin Skinner
Free Documentary - History
comments
Comments by "Kevin Skinner" (@kevinskinner4986) on "Free Documentary - History" channel.
Previous
5
Next
...
All
So does Marcus Allen still get paid by that magazine to lie?
1
NASA does NOT mean "deceive" in Hebrew. Nasa means "wing" or "lift up", which is an appropriate name. You have been deceived and are deceiving others. The devil would be proud of you. As a reminder, God kills or orders killed millions in the Bible, many of them innocent. The only people the Devil actually kills during the entire bible are killed on God's direct orders and permission. Satan is not the enemy of God. He's God's stooge that does horrible things for God so that God can pretend to be the savior to his own problems like an arsonist firefighter.
1
It also turned out to not be one of the Apollo rocks and instead a gift not from NASA that was simply assumed to be a moon rock and donated without appraisal based on when it was received, despite the fact that Holland still has both of their actual rocks, the fact that it doesn't resemble any of their other samples, and the fact that it was received before NASA actually passed them out. But sure, let's blame NASA for things they literally had nothing to do with because that's much easier than telling the truth.
1
A camera attached to the ship. It was attached to a drop-down panel for storing tools that was opened from inside.
1
.... but getting to the moon isn't based on airplane tech. It's based on rocket technology, which has been used in war for a thousand years.
1
@lorichet ....... because radio waves are blocked by solid cement walls. There are no cement walls between the Earth and the moon.
1
@stevetilbrook3402 ..... because the service module is where the explosion was and they were surveying damage to it.
1
Um. No, there's 1/6th gravity on the moon. Isn't it amazing how stupidity and arrogance go hand in hand like a pair of conjoined twins?
1
It cost 130 billion dollars to afford it the first time, and how would that silence anybody? Even lobotomy patients are smart enough to realize that they'll just lie and claim the new missions are fake, which they'll undoubtedly do before their return trip in 2025 lands.
1
@Petra N in 2025 I won't even remember that this comment exists unless you respond. I'll have forgotten about it by the end of the week. Yeah. Uh-huh. First time. Sure. Soooooo... do your leaders just lie for fun then? Is deceiving people like a hobby? Cause I was under the impression that the fact that your "truth" movement had to stoop to intentionally removing details from the footage and inventing fictional "scientists" to support you kind of meant you were wrong.
1
.... why? There's no drag in space.
1
Okay, but even if there was a jew that was put to death by the Romans for having a cult worship him, there's basically zero evidence that he was actually a demigod beyond the church threatening death and excommunication if you don't believe it too.
1
Wide angle lenses make objects look smaller than they actually are. If you've ever seen a wide angle photo of the moon, it can be so small you'd think it was Venus.
1
Question. Operation Fishbowl was at about 250 miles high. But your side claims that the sun and moon are about 3,000 miles high. And yet they're within the firmament, so therefore the firmament must be farther than them. So, they tried to 'bomb through a barrier" that was THOUSANDS OF MILES AWAY.
1
A camera mounted to the ship on a drop-down equipment panel.
1
The Americans announced to the Russia exactly what their plan was because Russia had a probe going at the same time and they didn't want the two to crash into each other. They'd have certainly had the technology to track the ship if it remained in low orbit.
1
@therealzilch I know right, think of the play place!
1
And yet your "truth" movement has so little real evidence that your leaders have spent the last twenty years repeatedly lying about their "evidence." Hmm....
1
.... and Armstrong looks exactly like he did in the Gemini 8 press conference three years before.
1
Liquid oxygen takes up about 1/800th the volume of a room temperature gas.
1
@ladylindemanmogot9992 They have an oxidizer for the fuel. So what? They mix oxidizers into gunpowder too. The rover folds up and is stored in an equipment bay on the lower half of the ship. There's videos of it being removed on Apollo 15 that would have taken you thirty seconds to find if you had bothered to look. Baa Baa goes Lindeman Mogot, the conspirasheep who thinks they're so much smarter than NASA because they watched a Youtube conspiracy video and blindly believed what they were told without putting an ounce of thought into it. Who's a good little sheepy? You are!
1
Mary, the rover folds up like a Transformers action figure and was stored in an equipment bay on the lower half of the ship. Apollo 15 has video of it being removed.
1
..... because you need to test your technology to make sure there's no flaws in it and that it works as intended. It's a new ship with new construction. Of course it's going to be tests. Why does the auto industry still do crash tests? Surely they've figured out seat belts by now.
1
No, it doesn't. It means "wing" or "lift up". That s with a mark over it? That's a pronunciation guide and it's "sh" as in "shellfish". There is nobody on this planet that pronounces it "nasha" that doesn't speech impediment or blood alcohol level of Yes. But you'll keep lying and claim it does. After all... your religion has spent literal centuries lying about the Jews. Why stop now?
1
Really? Because it's represented through the entirety of human writing.....
1
@rockethead7 I see three comments from you on here including a long explanation post.
1
@cryptoknight7256 Any vibrations you have is not going to be a ROOOOOOAAAAR of the engine like you expect, most of the shaking would be caused by the exhaust hitting the air, and noise-cancelling microphones were invented in the 40s. The loose dust isn't very thick, so any crater you get is going to be very small, and pressure is divided by area. The wider the area, the less pressure is exerted upon it per square inch. You know who discovered the "no crater" right? It was Armstrong himself. He calls it out less than a minute after getting off the ladder. That's right, NASA knows it should be there, but had their actor call attention to their own mistake instead of fixing it Does that make sense to you?
1
@cryptoknight7256 You need to fire your rocket at a reduced rate. if your thrust is stronger than your object's weight, it goes up.
1
@cryptoknight7256 That's not the loose dust. That's the TOTAL dust. Everything below a few inches is more compacted. This is also what they found on their probes even before Apollo.
1
Um... the lunar landers can't work on Earth. They're not powerful enough to fight Earth gravity. They can also only be used ONCE each.
1
Dust clouds don't form in a vacuum. Without air resistance, every particle will be blown outwards away from the ship at high-speed and will settle immediately.
1
@lorichet First of all, sand on Earth is weathered smooth from millions of years of being tumbled around by wind and water. The moon dust is sharp and jagged. Second, you do realize that static electricity increases the lower the humidity is, right?
1
So.... if it is landed on, that proves that God's lying right?
1
Area 51 is most likely just an R&D base. No aliens there. It's strictly off-limits because the government doesn't people stealing information about their prototype equipment and selling it or leaking it on the internet.
1
So what did you do? Copyright violation? Harassment? Inappropriate, racial, or anti-Semetic content? None of the "missing" videos are deleted, just lower on search results, so either you broke Youtube's Terms of Service or you're lying.
1
It doesn't. It has a rod through the top holding it out, but otherwise spends most of the footage when it hasn't recently been touched hanging limp like a shower curtain.
1
@terryhill4732 .... not if it only has a single rod through the top of it. The bottom corner will hang loose.
1
No camera they can carry is going to outperform the telescopes we have on Earth, and it's the same starts we see from Earth with less variation than season to season. They took some ultraviolet photographs, but the hoaxers just claim those to be fake.
1
Bart Sibrel's been caught red-handed faking evidence multiple times.... Did you see his recent "deathbed confession"? The Government somehow named their project after a slang that wasn't created until AFTER Apollo. Ooops.
1
1962: The Jetsons 1963: Dr Who 1964: HG Wells' First Men in the Moon. 1965: Lost in Space 1966: Star Trek 1968: Planet of the Apes 1968: 2001 A Space Odessey 1969: Marooned, a movie explicitly based on NASA's programs. Sounds to me like everybody's jumping on the bandwagon because space flight is the big popular talking point in society. I've seen picnic blankets with less obvious patterns
1
So if scientists and engineers know this as a fact, why is your side so desperate that they've been caught inventing fictional scientists to write their articles because they can't get any to actually support them?
1
Yes, but it's less than Earth's.
1
So fun fact. The Earth is not only 4x the size of the moon, but 3x more reflective. A person on the moon would see the Earth about 40x brighter than we see the moon.... and yet we can see and film here just fine, even in horizon to horizon snow, which reflects more than 90% of sunlight. Explain why you aren't blind, Fraud Johnson.
1
@mirandarogers3595 I see no evidence that he's taken even a single step. A glacier moves faster than he does.
1
Um.... there's plenty of mountains in the other missions; Apollo 11 just landed in an empty plain. That's like saying that there's no mountains on Earth because they don't appear in pictures of Kansas.
1
Judgement's going to be f-ing hilarious. All of the conspiracy theorists and Flat Earthers will claim that Jesus is covering up for the Devil and follow their fake "truth" movement straight to hell.
1
@Immortalizable Are we certain that you aren't AI too? I mean... when you people actually bother to give "evidence" it's the exact same claims that were debunked twenty years ago, and you all give the same "Blah blah blah shill propagandist sheeple' claptrap. Your programmer needs better material, bot boy.
1
@gregridgeway8790 Be honest. The real reason that the Freemasons are "evil" is because they don't follow the Church.
1
@whatsyurprob158 Aren't you people all over censorship like stink on a skunk? Isn't that why you people cheer when your precious leaders ban anybody that calls them out for lying?
1
Awwwww, the little baby Twuther thinks he's so smart because he blindly believed a "confession" that is clearly lying because it tries to name their "secret project" after a phase that was invented after Apollo had already happened, from a man whose house mysteriously burned to destroy his proof down AFTER the date the video was supposedly taken, on a channel that had to block comments because they got caught fabricating evidence. But but but but it must be true! A video on the internet said it was!
1
Previous
5
Next
...
All