Comments by "Peter deWolf" (@StoneShards) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. Marcus Oakes<-- You've put your finger on the pulse of the problem: Putin is a stand-in for everything the Soviet Union used to stand for. The difficult transition from communist/atheist to democratic/Christian has been almost universally discounted in the West. And, at the time of this transition, the West was decidedly unhelpful, deliberately--as if a powerful, hidden faction moved behind the scenes to scuttle the transition...but we don't talk about that (though we should). There's powerful world history that's been "baked" into the American political psyche, creating a certain inertia of political awareness that has not yet been successfully countered within the individuals who are subject to this inertia. They don't seem to care to understand the meaning of Russia's emergence from communism, or even more likely, they think they already do understand...everything. That's low IQ; that's Dunning-Kruger.
    1
  2. Well, Rand, did you confront Fauci with the "black and white" evidence you mention?! If you did, it wasn't deemed clip-worthy by anybody...
    1
  3. The guy says Trump's numbers are WRONG without telling us what the RIGHT numbers are! WHAT! And the guy thinks he's being...persuasive?! Oh, well...
    1
  4. I think Media Research missed more than a few.
    1
  5. I'm really getting tired of "professors" who don't speak proper English. Her command of the language is not at all sophisticated. For all you cab tell by her speech, she could be working on her GED!
    1
  6. Mockingbirds, ala project mockingbird.
    1
  7. What's the mental disorder when you claim special secret knowledge?! hahaha
    1
  8. Russophobia is the Military Industrial Complex's main money machine; and it lobbies congress heavily. I don't see any mystery.
    1
  9. How is "made to feel otherwise" equivalent to "ordered"!?! This "teacher" needs remediation. But it's encouraging to hear of such youthful perspicacity in these days of thoughtlessness. I'd like to think this little girl is NOT an exception amongst her peers.
    1
  10. Too bad we don't have something like a US ultimate court that could decide this stuff! Darn!
    1
  11. Can Friedman do that? I mean, isn't he advocating, even engaging in, something illegal? If the companies were to collude to harm Trump they would be engaging in political activity for the purpose of overthrowing the US government. I don't imagine that would be allowed...
    1
  12. Seems only logical to treat BLM as a criminal GANG! Then you don't care about whether antifa is an "idea" or "organization"...talk about a red herring...
    1
  13. Arrest and detain Pelosi for (plotting?) insurrection; make the case later...much later...
    1
  14. Dems are great Monday morning quarterbacks, with all their self-confident alternatives to what an elected president is doing! hahaha
    1
  15. What these leftist boors don't understand is that when they embarrass the president in front of his guest, they also embarrass that guest. Or do they understand that and deliberately set out to make a foreign dignitary uncomfortable? One would hope not; but one could also never really be sure.
    1
  16. "Racism" is just the latest attempt to shut up "unpopular" opinions. Language can be a tool of communication, or manipulation. COVID-19 IS OVERRATED! hahaha...Was that Chris Cuomo, or Howdy Doody?! hehehe...yes, it IS overrated...duh...look at the numbers! People with poor language skills THINK poorly, eh, Chris!?
    1
  17. "Racial spoils system"! Nice turn of phrase! That is what it is--but it sounds appropriately worse when stated unequivocally. Even in the US, a study showed the most racist people on social media are BLACK!
    1
  18. "...Empathy..."...that's, like, a psychic power, right?! Mitchel...
    1
  19. Kerry met with foreign officials as a private US citizen. That should mean he has to say exactly what the conversations were--no privilege to hide behind. Why isn't he being asked to reveal the words used in the conversations?!
    1
  20. She says "ridiculous" to think there's no border crisis. That's an extreme understatement. It's not simply illogical; it's stupid, literally, to assert there's no border crisis in the presence of irrefutable evidence to the contrary. I keep getting the feeling Chuck and Nancy have their fingers crossed behind their backs.
    1
  21. Omar wears makeup. How can a muslim woman wear makeup, given that its purpose is sexual signaling?! Oh, she's NOT muslim? Sorry about that...
    1
  22. The process of solving these, social, problems may be called, "civilization". It's an ongoing process to which we all contribute--at least on our better days...hehehe
    1
  23. Speaking extemporaneously is challenging enough without having to self-censor. But in order to not offend anyone, you have to speak insincerely--and THAT'S got a peculiar stench about it (i.e. "phony").
    1
  24. "Don't try to scare your population with make-believe threats."--Putin to Wallace...Wallace to Putin: "Advertisers pay for exposure."
    1
  25. The disease doesn't "return"! It's everywhere, all the time. What needs to "return" is everybody's immunity. Fake vaccine immunity is unnecessary, since the disease itself is only marginally lethal. A vaccine would be useful to compromised individuals, like old and sick people. You have to remember how vaccines work: the vaccine delivers a greatly weakened version of the virus, along with "adjutants" that rev up the immune RESPONSE, to stimulate the body to create antibodies. A slight illness might result, but nothing like what would occur in a full-fledged infection--or, so the story goes. However, the vaccine-induced "immunity" pales in comparison to the naturally-accrued immunity, lasting a matter of years before requiring a "booster"; whereas, natural immunity is usually considered to be for a lifetime. It's easy to see that vaccine immunity has LIMITED UTILITY...it shouldn't be cast as "world savior"...
    1
  26. But, here's the skinny: federal law states that a state's apportionment of representatives can be REDUCED commensurate with the proportion of the population that is NOT citizens. So, a state that wants to host illegal immigrants will lose House of Representatives membership. In the case of California, that might mean four fewer congressional representatives. Hmm...clever? We'll see...
    1
  27. This Seattle situation is INTOLERABLE! Talk about, "sending a message", the city government impotence is inexcusable! A few lawless punks are sucking up popular resources owed to the law-abiding citizens! And the city explicitly allows it!? How many slaps to the face does it take to wake the silent, sleeping majority to their constitutional DUTY TO RESIST lawlessness?!
    1
  28. Yeah...whatever happened to Candy Crowley?! Eh, never mind...
    1
  29. It's so funny: the woman in yellow steps all over the black guy's point in her rush to "possess" the talking stick, and then says NOTHING having to do with the black guy's point! This is why I object to female analysts in general: they don't engage points straight on, like men, who see a made point on the table, in the air, as shameful to ignore; women seem to lack that confidence to engage honestly, and, instead, come at you sideways, as it were. It's like they think, "Hey, I heard what you said; but now it's MY TURN to talk (act like an authority), and I'm better off not even acknowledging what the person before me said, especially since I wasn't really listening anyway <tee-hee-hee>." Men can adopt a balanced perspective; I've NEVER seen a woman do that well--there's always...extra attitude, inflection (i.e. propaganda) to try to sneak in a secret slant while trying to appear balanced...bless their hearts, each and every one!
    1
  30. Voting rights are already qualified, by age. If I was to add a further qualification, it would be IQ, instead of "non-felon". But, that's not fair, eh? Idiots should be encouraged to vote, eh? You see, they don't make sense: the battles they choose are but minor skirmishes that they exaggerate into breathless talking points. They won't tackle ANY of these issues head-on; they don't want to do serious work--they want to look good enough for reelection. And you can NEVER look good ENOUGH...
    1
  31. ICE cannot be "abolished" since it's an integral part of Department of Homeland Security. You'd have to laboriously refactor most of the "patriot" legislation from 2001 in order to accommodate this proposed "abolition". The government function of border and customs control is constitutionally-mandated: the government simply must exercise this function. But I get the sense that some people advocating for this abolition think that without ICE there would be NO border control--and that's absurdly impossible.
    1
  32. The dems are coming to realize that Trump has them politically outclassed to such a degree that they are collectively flabbergasted. They're fighting outside their weight classification. They are supremely frustrated at their own incompetence to engage Trump. So they appear to be petulant children...Not a good look...
    1
  33. Trump sets a fine example, not getting bent out of shape by "nasty"! Here he is being interviewed by Morgan, who's had considerable negative to say about Trump previously. A lesser man would have said, "No interview...he said something uncomplimentary about me." Thin skins just make everything more difficult.
    1
  34. What's up with women and pointy-toed shoes! I feel intimidated! 😉
    1
  35. Secret people giving secret testimony, secretly...hahaha...Nunes is laying it out in no uncertain terms! And the newsreaders ask each other, "What did he say?"...ah...jeez...
    1
  36. No Acosta accosting the president? No problem. It really doesn't matter at all if Acosta, or someone else reports. Acosta's reportage has always been trashy; his style is obnoxious to elicit "candid" responses from his victims, which are, of course, highly newsworthy! CNN is a tabloid at heart, and Acosta has no business being in the presence of adults.
    1
  37. Raisin Awareness? Raisins in ice cream?! Uh-uh. No thank-you.
    1
  38. If they impeach and the senate does not convict, can the dems do it again, and again; or is there some kind of "double jeopardy" at play that could prevent them from harassing Trump with impeachments?
    1
  39. "Prohibit recordings of the live feed"? How does THAT work! Are we on our honor to not hit the record button?! hahaha...
    1
  40. It might seem that Fauci is "a danger to himself or others". I think that's all they need to commit him, against his will, for 72 hours for psychiatric observation.
    1
  41. Yeah, "SECRET WITNESSES"! How does that EVER sound like a good idea in the United States of America?! I know! I know! "STUPID" is how it ever sounds like a good idea...We can no longer afford to coddle those who don't know how to think! Technology has EMPOWERED idiocy! It has become dangerous to humor the stupid...
    1
  42. Schiff, doing this in public, would be greatly embarrassed!
    1
  43. The real telling partial statement from Mueller went something like this: "But this is a unique situation"! THAT'S what I want to know more about! He's implying exceptions to the law are allowed for "unique situations", which is NOT a general principle of law, as far I know. Nobody chose to drag him out on that...
    1
  44. Hysterical hypotheticals from the leftist are hilarious. Hey, the eight-year-old thinks he's a genius, got it all figured out. Useless talk.
    1
  45. Why does everybody crave "special treatment"!
    1
  46. I don't like Gowdy's defeatist air: don't worry about Clinton (that boat is sinking under its own weight--and rot), just keep unraveling this thing--and get some technical help in organizing/analyzing the information. I think when you identify the various threads of this rat's nest, certain special meta-information might reveal itself. If you don't root out this rot, Gowdy is right: this country will cease to exist.
    1
  47. Could a higher court issue an injunction to halt this activist judge's activity in this case? How should a rogue jurist be counteracted constitutionally?
    1
  48. It might take six months to clear a "witness" through the courts, since Trump would assert executive privilege.
    1
  49. Fox is so kind to not mention Schiff's connection to Ed Buck...why?...
    1
  50. The Red Hen's owner is a walking non sequitur.
    1