Comments by "B Bodziak" (@B_Bodziak) on "Fox News" channel.

  1.  @tferg8248  All I hear from these women in this segment is jealousy.
    2
  2. Now this lt gov wants all older people to sacrifice their lives to the Coronavirus in order to have a vibrant economy. Well, Patrick, how about you go first? Eh?
    2
  3.  @leancuisine6443  OR is he too ignorant to know that "American" isn't a race? Black and White people, along with people of Asian decent live in every country on our planet. There's obviously an issue when a White American feels the need to tell a Black American to ignore his own race as though through that acknowledgment his race is inherently"less than" in some way. Have you ever heard someone correct a caucasian who says, "I'm a White American," by telling them they don't need to acknowledge the "white" part? No, you don't, because being White isn't viewed as a negative. If you are not able to understand what I have written, it's because it's rooted in systemic racism -- racism that you don't believe exists because YOU are unable to see it. However, just b/c YOU are unable to see it, does not mean it isn't true and happening.
    2
  4.  @neoplasmax  What you are proposing is a dictator.
    2
  5. How ANYONE can refuse to watch the 1/6 hearings and STILL believe themself to be a patriot is beyond me.
    2
  6. ​@williamkumpf2682 Wrong
    2
  7.  @wife97  Why can't the WH simply release the actual recording of the phone call instead of a fragmented, non-verbatim transcript??
    2
  8. ​ @priceisright1580 They have a standing policy that federal criminal trials and courtroom appearances are not televised nor video/audio recorded. However, they made an exception for Watergate. They'll likely do so for Trump's.
    2
  9.  Chris S  Both, actually and they won't be wrong
    2
  10.  @hankpatriot5227  Definition of being a sheep
    2
  11.  @stormysyndrome7043  It's showing 9 now and there are 7 replies. IF there's a spam comment that enough people report to push YT controllers to look at the comment for deletion, those deleted comments stay in the count total. This came about with one of the recent YT updates. I think it's supposed to give more transparency about how many comments are deleted. I don't know if it was intended by design, but if you post a comment and later delete it, it stays in the total count, as well. Actually, I should say that's been the case for a handful of comments I've deleted over the last couple of months.
    2
  12. ​ @Johndoe345-k2d  To be fair, that's not hard to do, and I have a great respect for President Carter.... I am biased because I worked for him, post-presidency.
    2
  13. Wow. You can sure call names. You must be junior or even Senior!
    2
  14. ​ @jszorc3488  Actually, Biden has done a much better job than the majority of us who voted for him expected. That said, most of us would not like him to run again because of his age. I think Trump is too old, as well, but I have more faith in the cabinet Biden chooses for his second term than I ever would Trump's second term choices. Trump will just surround himself with idiots like Rudy and Powell -- people who will only say "Yes".
    2
  15. Reading these comments and almost every Faux Noise viewer us not focused on whether or not Trump allowed it to continue to happen... No! They're concerned with who leaked the info and/or why Donna B is on here... WOW. In 3.5 short years, the sheep have managed to gain a new skill-set: Deflect! Deflect! Deflect! "Oh, LOOK! I see something shiny!
    2
  16. No, that money is still in the hong Kong bank.
    2
  17. Julian Assange, possibly-- he hasn't had his day in court yet, but not Stone. Stone was convicted on 7 felonies.
    2
  18. ​ @section2financialintellige401  Partisan was used correctly.
    2
  19. Faux Noise
    2
  20.  @Ranger1PresentsVirtualRealms  You have no idea what you're talking about son. Even fortune 100 companies are not a party to 5800 lawsuits.
    2
  21. Hmmm. You didn't seem to mind when Facebook allowed Russian misinformation helping to get trump elected.
    2
  22. Then you haven't watched many Faux Noise videos on YT.
    2
  23. Yes! Get rid of the electoral college ! Who gets the most votes wins the election. Simple as that!
    2
  24. You do realize that Vivek coming off of Colorado's ballot was inevitable anyway, right?
    2
  25.  @wademitchell3817  Yep, and the GOP in Congress has adamantly refused to allow federal oversight of federal elections.
    2
  26.  @davidbaker1918  Hey, I think we've finally found some common ground with Maga -- I fully agree with the OP. Pull ALL the Republican candidates off the ballots. Works for me!
    2
  27.  @DB-ml7bb  so, tell us. What did he lie about in his comments? Trump was a lifelong Democrat until he decided to run!
    2
  28.  @dothemathemathics7537  Yes! Many people have been involved. Thanks definitely go to trump for being so proactive about getting it past clinicals and on the market! I do wish he was more proactive about getting people, mostly Republicans, vaccinated. I still don't understand why his vaccination was so secretive/done "in the cover of night""!!. Any thoughts??
    2
  29. You're right. Trump would have finished pulling us out of NATO & Putin could have taken Urkraine in a few days.
    2
  30. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions? So, by "Right Decision" you must mean "sweep it under the rug" because the "Right Decision" would actually expose Trump. I'm going to guess that you've changed your mind about Assange's credibility now that his testimony wouldn't line up with Trump's narrative. We haven't seen Fox follow-up now have we sweetie? All the other networks did...
    1
  31. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions? So, by "Right Decision" you must mean "sweep it under the rug" because the "Right Decision" would actually expose Trump. I'm going to guess that you've changed your mind about Assange's credibility now that his testimony wouldn't line up with Trump's narrative.
    1
  32. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions? So, by "Right Decision" you must mean "sweep it under the rug" because the "Right Decision" would actually expose Trump. I'm going to guess that you've changed your mind about Assange's credibility now that his testimony wouldn't line up with Trump's narrative.
    1
  33. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions?
    1
  34. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions? So, by "Right Decision" you must mean "sweep it under the rug" because the "Right Decision" would actually expose Trump. I'm going to guess that you've changed your mind about Assange's credibility now that his testimony wouldn't line up with Trump's narrative.
    1
  35. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions? So, by "Right Decision" you must mean "sweep it under the rug" because the "Right Decision" would actually expose Trump. I'm going to guess that you've changed your mind about Assange's credibility now that his testimony wouldn't line up with Trump's narrative.
    1
  36. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now, 2 yrs after he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions?
    1
  37. A leak? Really? Maybe, except the leak wouldn't have been from Hillary's side! BWAHAHAHA.
    1
  38. Well, it's 3 yrs later and now we know: *One year agoTrump offered Assange a FULL Presidential Pardon if he would take the stand and LIE about Russia's election involvement. To get the Pardon, Assange had to lie under oath and say that Russia's election involvement was to help Clinton even though Assange knew and had even stated that Russia's some purpose was to help Trump get elected. Are you still supporting Assange now-- even though he declined Trump's bribe and won't fall in line with the rest of Trump's lying minions?
    1
  39. I APPRECIATE the CDC WAITING until the data came in instead of just going with what MIGHT feel okay. Cruz is an abomination in the political world.
    1
  40.  Ron Benghazi Hedlund and Reality
    1
  41.  @outdoorloser4340  Tucker shoots fish in a barrel 5 nights a week. OF COURSE, hes going to injure one. HOWEVER, as this case was updated early this morning, the NSA who signed the order was a trump appointee to the top clearance of the NSA's cyber security division. She was a first time republican candidate for an open House seat in SC and was trump promoted. She lost to the democrat challenger. Her NSA security clearance(s) was yanked last night. Tucker should call Trump and ask him.
    1
  42. An email to the Budget Office telling them to halt the aid to Ukraine 90 minutes after Trump hung up on the phone call and the money was released the day after the WH beccame aware of the whistleblower's report -- Keep on believing he's not guilty...
    1
  43.  @mR-dc4oq  What, exactly, was he doing that Biden did?
    1
  44.  @mR-dc4oq  Hey, I'm all for justice. If either or both of the Bidens broke the law, then indict them and put them on trial. The same goes for Hillary. But, when does the "Other people did it" defense end? Trump based much of his campaign around Hillary breaking protocol by not using a WH server for her email communications. You're so distraught over her doing it, that you want her to go to prison for it. Well, Ivanka was caught doing the EXACT same thing and if anyone should have known better, it was Ivanka. You want Hillary in prison, then Ivanka needs to be indicted for the same offense. In fact, Ivanka is likely even more culpable given that she spent 2 years pointing out Hillary. What anyone else did is a separate issue and should be dealt with accordingly. It shouldn't give Trump a pass. Why should it? I can't fight a speeding ticket with the defense: I admit I was going 20 mph higher than what was posted, but since other people speed without getting caught, I am not guilty of speeding.
    1
  45.  @ritamccartt-kordon283  So, that's your defense? Because it was handed over prior to the deadline the information doesn't matter. Hahaha
    1
  46.  @ritamccartt-kordon283  It ALL came out that TRUMP'S administration just completely cleared Hillary of ANY wrong doing on the 9th of January. What makes you think Trump isn't blowing smoke up your arse about Biden in order to downgrade him in the polls. Did you read that: TRUMPS OWN ADMIN cleared her of everything --there was absolutely nothing there. I'm not a Hillary fan and did not and would not vote for her, but she definitely got a raw deal from Trump's BS
    1
  47.  @carolyndennis4947  See Above!
    1
  48. Did Lauren Broebert receive a $10k fine today when she refused to allow capitol police look inside her purse? Doubtful.
    1
  49. He's up for re-election in 2026.
    1
  50. He already is unemployed. Don't you remember he resigned on Dec 20, 2020. He saw what was happening.
    1