Comments by "" (@rvdb8876) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. 3
  2. 3
  3. 3
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6.  @cgjoe64  I fully understand your frustration. Downplayed is the correct word. But why is it downplayed? An analyst in the Netherlands, named Maurice de Hond, came to the same conclusion. It surprised him that so many people suddenly became infected during the carnival, which is celebrated exuberantly in the south of the Netherlands (February/March). The contamination in the ski resort Ischgl in Austria also attracted his attention. He analyzed these events and found that the infections did not occur outside on the street or on the ski slopes, but during the after parties and apres-ski parties in closed halls, where many people gathered, many of whom (massively) became infected by inhale the contaminated air for hours. Air that may have been contaminated by only one or a few people. But in this poorly ventilated space, hundreds of people could be infected through the air. As an analyst without a medical background, he contacted various epidemiologists, also abroad, who confirmed his analysis that it is transmissible by aerosols. Maurice de Hond ran against a wall of indifference and reluctance at the government in the Netherlands and the Dutch RIVM still calls aerosol contamination "negligible". You would think that if you were in a crisis, you would listen to any good advice that is given to you. Not that you should just accept that good advice without hesitation, but at least you should look at it and study it. But they (the government) did not do that. Marice de Hond is also very frustrated, because he realizes how much suffering could have been avoided.
    3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 3
  10. 3
  11. 3
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. I respect you Dr. John Campbell as long as you talk about medical issues, which is your field of course. I'm also following your advice on vitamin D, and not just because you say it, but because all science now clearly points in the direction of how important it is to the proper functioning of our bodies and immune systems. I find it very mean of you to call people concerned about the vaccine "anti-vaxxers." I am not an anti-vaxxer at all, I am 67 years old and have been vaccinated against smallpox, polio and tetanus. Not for measles, because when I was a kid we just got those teething problems and we weren't vaccinated for them. Not an anti-vaxxer, but to be fair, these vaccines have only received experimental approval and beyond their immediate adverse reactions, the long-term effects could not possibly be tested in the space of a few months. In my country there are many GPs who say they will not get vaccinated. They are of course well aware that the mRNA vaccine is experimental and is being used on a large scale for the first time in humans. I also do not support your enthusiasm for the "political" decisions to introduce stricter restrictions (lockdown, curfew, etc). A few days ago you were surprised that the corona numbers in Russia fell, while there are almost no restrictions. You also demonized Peru for the bad results. This while Peru is one of the countries where very strict corona restrictions apply, which were imposed with a heavy hand, manu militari. Do you still not realize that you have to ask yourself serious questions about these strict restrictions on liberty and human rights? Then there's the bullshit of downplaying the adverse vaccination reactions. They were due to "underlying diseases in many of those elderly". It is strange that this same narrative is not used for the same elderly people with underlying diseases when they become infected with the corona virus. How do you call something like this in English: "a double standard"? Moreover, there are not only elderly people who had adverse reactions after vaccination. The pdf file below from VAERS also demonstrates this: https://mega.nz/file/WwIVSAjA#C7zHYRXPwxW1Lr555ypRaLuUfRUeLatVs7aF5FgO2Co The document is several days old and the list continues to grow. You can see that completely healthy people, who are not even in the risk group in terms of corona, nevertheless suffered serious, sometimes fatal or permanent injuries, after the vaccination. The second injection in particular sometimes leads to violent reactions.
    2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47.  @richardw2646  Quote; "but the rest of the world knows the truth'". You mean your truth? The figures I gave are the WHO figures. You juggle with figures ranging from 0.5 to 1%? An increase from 0.5 to 1% is an increase of 100%. So you do use a very stretchy elastic. I don't know where you get your data, but I have no desire whatsoever to get you out of your fear hypnosis. So it doesn't matter what I think or you think, does it? I just find it strange that there are people who just take a risk without thinking, without realizing it. Well, that is not really strange, because the media propaganda does a good job of promoting (free) advertising for the vaccine manufacturers. When it comes to a disease such as smallpox, tetanus or polio, a vaccine can be justified. Even if these vaccines have side effects. But in this case it is indefensible. The mutational properties of these viruses is the main reason why vaccine manufacturers never attempted to develop a vaccine for them. Because the development of a valid vaccine takes about 5 to 20 years to study its long-term effects. Something that has not happened here and that can't be done with these mutating viruses. Hence the 2009 debacle with the swine flu vaccine. The fact that they are now (again) trying to force this is a complete mystery to me. They clearly haven't learned anything from it. But when it all goes wrong, the true responsibles will escape their responsibility, the victims who have walked into it with their eyes closed will bear the consequences. In any case, I am not walking into it. By no means.
    2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2